Cost, carbon emissions and modal shift in intermodal network design decisions

被引:72
|
作者
Bouchery, Yann [1 ]
Fransoo, Jan [2 ]
机构
[1] Ecole Management Normandie, Axe Logist Terre Mer Risque, F-76087 Le Havre, France
[2] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Sch Ind Engn, NL-5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands
关键词
Intermodal transportation; Hinterland network design; Cost; Carbon emissions; Modal shift; FREIGHT TRANSPORT; HUB LOCATION; INTENSITY; ENERGY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.11.017
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Intermodal transportation is often presented as an efficient solution for reducing carbon emissions without compromising economic growth. In this article, we present a new intermodal network design model in which both the terminal location and the allocation between direct truck transportation and intermodal transportation are optimized. This model allows for studying the dynamics of intermodal transportation solutions in the context of hinterland networks from a cost, carbon emissions and modal shift perspective. We show that maximizing the modal shift is harmful for both cost and carbon emissions and that there is a carbon optimal level of modal shift. We also show that even if transportation cost and carbon emissions share the same structure, these two objectives lead to different solutions and that the terminal is located closer to the port when optimizing cost and further away when optimizing carbon emissions. The model also allows for studying the tradeoff between distance and volume, the impact of using aggregated models for estimating train transportation cost and carbon emissions as well as the potential policy measures that enable aligning cost and carbon emissions. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:388 / 399
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Model to Evaluate the Modal Shift Potential of Subsidy Policy in Favor of Sea-Rail Intermodal Transport
    Tao, Xuezong
    LTLGB 2012: PROCEEDINGS OF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LOW-CARBON TRANSPORTATION AND LOGISTICS, AND GREEN BUILDINGS. VOL 1, 2013, : 153 - 159
  • [32] Route/Modal choice analysis and tradeoffs evaluation of the intermodal transport network of Peninsular Malaysia
    Gohari, Adel
    Matori, Abd Nasir
    Yusof, Khamaruzaman W.
    Toloue, Iraj
    Myint, Khin C.
    Sholagberu, Abdulkadir T.
    COGENT ENGINEERING, 2018, 5 (01):
  • [33] 'No net cost in cutting carbon emissions'
    Reichhardt, T
    NATURE, 1997, 389 (6650) : 429 - 429
  • [34] ‘No net cost in cutting carbon emissions’
    Tony Reichhardt
    Nature, 1997, 389 : 429 - 429
  • [35] AN OPTIMIZATION APPROACH TO THE INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN FRUIT COLD CHAIN, CONSIDERING COST, QUALITY DEGRADATION AND CARBON DIOXIDE FOOTPRINT
    Ma, Qianli
    Wang, Wenyuan
    Peng, Yun
    Song, Xiangqun
    POLISH MARITIME RESEARCH, 2018, 25 (01) : 61 - 69
  • [36] Mood fluctuations shift cost–benefit tradeoffs in economic decisions
    Roeland Heerema
    Pablo Carrillo
    Jean Daunizeau
    Fabien Vinckier
    Mathias Pessiglione
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [37] On the influence of infrastructure availability on companies decisions toward modal shift and relocation of falicities
    Wehrle, Rebecca
    Gast, Johannes
    Wiens, Marcus
    Schultmann, Frank
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH INTERDISCIPLINARY PERSPECTIVES, 2023, 19
  • [38] Modelling port competition for intermodal network design with environmental concerns
    Xu, Xinglu
    Zhang, Qi
    Wang, Wenyuan
    Peng, Yun
    Song, Xiangqun
    Jiang, Ying
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 202 : 720 - 735
  • [39] Design and operation of intermodal transportation network in the Marmara region of Turkey
    Resat, Hamdi G.
    Turkay, Metin
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2015, 83 : 16 - 33
  • [40] Significance of intermodal freight modal choice criteria: MCDM-based decision support models and SP-based modal shift policies
    Gohari, Adel
    Bin Ahmad, Anuar
    Balasbaneh, Ali Tighnavard
    Gohari, Ali
    Hasan, Razi
    Sholagberu, Abdulkadir Taofeeq
    TRANSPORT POLICY, 2022, 121 : 46 - 60