Recruitment and retention of underrepresented populations in Alzheimer's disease research: A systematic review

被引:184
|
作者
Gilmore-Bykovskyi, Andrea L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jin, Yuanyuan [2 ]
Gleason, Carey [4 ]
Flowers-Benton, Susan [5 ]
Block, Laura M. [2 ]
Dilworth-Anderson, Peggye [6 ]
Barnes, Lisa L. [7 ]
Shah, Manish N. [1 ,4 ,8 ]
Zuelsdorff, Megan [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Med, Div Geriatr, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Nursing, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[3] William S Middleton Mem Vet Adm Med Ctr, Geriatr Res Educ & Clin Ctr, Madison, WI 53705 USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin, Wisconsin Alzheimers Dis Res Ctr, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Madison, WI USA
[5] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Family Med & Community Hlth, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Madison, WI USA
[6] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[7] Rush Univ, Rush Alzheimers Dis Ctr, Dept Neurol Sci, Chicago, IL USA
[8] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Emergency Med, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Madison, WI USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Dementia; Recruitment science; Recruitment and retention; Recruitment interventions; Disparities; Representation in research;
D O I
10.1016/j.trci.2019.09.018
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) disproportionately impact racial and ethnic minority and socioeconomically disadvantaged adults. Yet, these populations are significantly underrepresented in research. Methods: We systematically reviewed the literature for published reports describing recruitment and retention of individuals from underrepresented backgrounds in ADRD research or underrepresented participants' perspectives regarding ADRD research participation. Relevant evidence was synthesized and evaluated for quality. Results: We identified 22 eligible studies. Seven studies focused on recruitment/retention approaches, all of which included multifaceted efforts and at least one community outreach component. There was considerable heterogeneity in approaches used, specific activities and strategies, outcome measurement, and conclusions regarding effectiveness. Despite limited use of prospective evaluation strategies, most authors reported improvements in diverse representation in ADRD cohorts. Studies evaluating participant views focused largely on predetermined explanations of participation including attitudes, barriers/facilitators, education, trust, and religiosity. Across all studies, the strength of evidence was low. Discussion: Overall, the quantity and quality of available evidence to inform best practices in recruitment, retention, and inclusion of underrepresented populations in ADRD research are low. Further efforts to systematically evaluate the success of existing and emergent approaches will require improved methodological standards and uniform measures for evaluating recruitment, participation, and inclusivity. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:751 / 770
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A critique of research on the use of activities with persons with Alzheimer's disease: a systematic literature review
    Marshall, MJ
    Hutchinson, SA
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2001, 35 (04) : 488 - 496
  • [42] WHAT GOOD ARE DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES IN ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH? - A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
    Vinals, L.
    Akinola, T.
    Sarri, G.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 : S754 - S754
  • [43] EAAT2 as a therapeutic research target in Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review
    Wood, Oliver W. G.
    Yeung, Jason H. Y.
    Faull, Richard L. M.
    Kwakowsky, Andrea
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 16
  • [44] Recruitment, retention and other methodological issues related to clinical trials for Alzheimer's disease
    Vellas, B.
    JOURNAL OF NUTRITION HEALTH & AGING, 2012, 16 (04): : 330 - 330
  • [45] Are biomarkers harmful to recruitment and retention in Alzheimer's disease clinical trials? An international perspective
    Hampel, H.
    Prvulovic, D.
    JOURNAL OF NUTRITION HEALTH & AGING, 2012, 16 (04): : 346 - 348
  • [46] Retention of Alzheimer Disease Research Participants
    Grill, Joshua D.
    Kwon, Jimmy
    Teylan, Merilee A.
    Pierce, Aimee
    Vidoni, Eric D.
    Burns, Jeffrey M.
    Lindauer, Allison
    Quinn, Joseph
    Kaye, Jeff
    Gillen, Daniel L.
    Nan, Bin
    ALZHEIMER DISEASE & ASSOCIATED DISORDERS, 2019, 33 (04): : 299 - 306
  • [47] Are biomarkers harmful to recruitment and retention in Alzheimer’s disease clinical trials? An international perspective
    H. Hampel
    D. Prvulovic
    The journal of nutrition, health & aging, 2012, 16 : 346 - 348
  • [48] Challenges and strategies pertaining to recruitment and retention of frail elderly in research studies: A systematic review
    Provencher, Veronique
    Ben Mortenson, W.
    Tanguay-Garneau, Laurence
    Belanger, Karine
    Dagenais, Marion
    ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2014, 59 (01) : 18 - 24
  • [49] SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF BIOMARKERS FOR DISEASE PROGRESSION IN ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE
    McGhee, David
    Counsell, Carl
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 84 (11):
  • [50] A Systematic Review of Biomarkers for Disease Progression in Alzheimer's Disease
    McGhee, David J. M.
    Ritchie, Craig W.
    Thompson, Paul A.
    Wright, David E.
    Zajicek, John P.
    Counsell, Carl E.
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (02):