Comparison of Recovery Time of Propofol and Midazolam with Propofol Alone for Sedation in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography

被引:0
|
作者
Samreen, Asma [1 ]
Waseem, Aamir [1 ]
Azam, Muhammad [2 ]
Kazmi, Itrat Hussain [1 ]
Bashir, Aamir [1 ]
Masud, Sarmad [3 ]
机构
[1] Shalamar Med & Dent Coll, Anesthesia, Lahore, Pakistan
[2] Serv Inst Med Sci, Anesthesia, Lahore, Pakistan
[3] Sharif Med & Dent Coll, Anesthesia, Lahore, Pakistan
来源
关键词
Propofol; midazolam; sedation outside operation theatre; HIGH-RISK OCTOGENARIANS; SYNERGISTIC SEDATION; DEEP SEDATION; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; ADMINISTERED PROPOFOL; INTRAVENOUS PROPOFOL; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; ORAL MIDAZOLAM; COMBINATION; MEPERIDINE;
D O I
10.53350/pjmhs211551024
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Procedural sedation is required for multiple short duration procedures outside of the operating rooms especially in radiology and endoscopy suites. Intravenous anesthetic agent with rapid recovery profile is desirable in such circumstances. This study aims to compare two regimens of intravenous anesthetic agents. Aim: To compare the mean recovery time of propofol and midazolam with propofol alone for sedation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Settings: Department of Anesthesia, Shalamar Hospital, Lahore. Study Duration: June 2017 to December 2017. Methods: A total of 70 adult patients aged 20-60 years undergoing ERCP under sedation were included. Patients were given a combination of propofol and midazolam in group A while propofol alone was given in group B. After procedure, pts were transferred to recovery room and were followed for assessment of recovery time. Data were analyzed in SPSS vr 21, Independent t-test was applied & p-value <= 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Significant difference was found in mean recovery time amongst both the groups. Mean recovery time in Group A (propofol and midazolam) was 19.29 +/- 4.50 minutes while in Group B (propofol alone) was 26.66 +/- 3.70 minutes showing statistically significant result with p-value = 0.0001. Conclusion: We conclude that mean recovery time with propofol plus midazolam is shorter as compared to propofol alone for sedation in ERCP.
引用
收藏
页码:1024 / 1027
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Feasibility of Non-Anesthesiologist-Administered Propofol Sedation for Emergency Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
    Ikeuchi, Nobuhito
    Itoi, Takao
    Gotoda, Takuji
    Kusano, Chika
    Kono, Shin
    Kamada, Kentaro
    Tsuchiya, Takayoshi
    Tominaga, Naoyuki
    Mukai, Shuntaro
    Moriyasu, Fuminori
    GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2015, 2015
  • [22] Dose requirement and complications of diluted and undiluted propofol for deep sedation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
    Amornyotin, Somchai
    Srikureja, Wichit
    Chalayonnavin, Wiyada
    Kongphlay, Siriporn
    HEPATOBILIARY & PANCREATIC DISEASES INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 10 (03) : 313 - 318
  • [23] A comparison between the effects of propofol-fentanyl with propofol-ketamine for sedation in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography outside the operating room
    Akhondzadeh, Reza
    Ghomeishi, Ali
    Nesioonpour, Sholeh
    Nourizade, Sanaz
    BIOMEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 39 (02) : 145 - 149
  • [24] PROPOFOL VERSUS MIDAZOLAM FOR MONITORED SEDATION - A COMPARISON OF INTRAOPERATIVE AND RECOVERY PARAMETERS
    PRATILA, MG
    FISCHER, ME
    ALAGESAN, R
    ALAGESAN, R
    REINSEL, RA
    PRATILAS, D
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 1993, 5 (04) : 268 - 274
  • [25] Comparison Between Continuous Infusion and Intermittent Bolus Injection of Propofol for Deep Sedation During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
    Yoo, Kyo-Sang
    Byun, Young Jae
    Ro, Youngouk
    Eun, Chang Soo
    Sohn, Joo Hyun
    Jeon, Yong Cheol
    Han, Dong Soo
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 81 (05) : AB341 - AB342
  • [26] Safety and clinical effectiveness of propofol for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
    Knezevic, Aleksandar
    Stojsic, Mirjana
    Gvozdenovic, Ljiljana
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 32 : E25 - E25
  • [27] Comparison of Midazolam Alone versus Midazolam Plus Propofol during Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
    Cho, Young Shim
    Seo, Euikeun
    Han, Jung-Ho
    Yoon, Soon Man
    Chae, Hee Bok
    Park, Seon Mee
    Youn, Sei Jin
    CLINICAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 45 (01) : 108 - 108
  • [28] Comparison of Hemodynamic and Sedation Effects of Midazolam and Propofol
    Eminoglu, Sermin
    Erguven, Nedret
    Kocergur, Emel
    Yavasca, Pinar
    Ozenc, Ecder
    Karasu, Derya
    Yilmaz, Canan
    HASEKI TIP BULTENI-MEDICAL BULLETIN OF HASEKI, 2015, 53 (01): : 20 - 23
  • [29] A comparison of the use of propofol alone and propofol with midazolam for pediatric magnetic resonance imaging sedation – a retrospective cohort study
    RyungA Kang
    Young Hee Shin
    Nam-Su Gil
    Ki Yoon Kim
    Hyean Yeo
    Ji Seon Jeong
    BMC Anesthesiology, 17
  • [30] A comparison of the use of propofol alone and propofol with midazolam for pediatric magnetic resonance imaging sedation - a retrospective cohort study
    Kang, RyungA
    Shin, Young Hee
    Gil, Nam-Su
    Kim, Ki Yoon
    Yeo, Hyean
    Jeong, Ji Seon
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2017, 17