Aftershock seismicity of the 27 February 2010 Mw 8.8 Maule earthquake rupture zone

被引:85
|
作者
Lange, Dietrich [1 ,2 ]
Tilmann, Frederik [2 ,3 ]
Barrientos, Sergio E. [4 ]
Contreras-Reyes, Eduardo [4 ]
Methe, Pascal [2 ,5 ]
Moreno, Marcos [2 ]
Heit, Ben [2 ]
Agurto, Hans [6 ]
Bernard, Pascal [7 ]
Vilotte, Jean-Pierre [7 ]
Beck, Susan [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
[2] GFZ German Res Ctr Geosci, Potsdam, Germany
[3] Free Univ Berlin, Inst Geol Wissensch, Berlin, Germany
[4] Univ Chile, Fac Ciencias Fis & Matemat, Dept Geofis, Santiago, Chile
[5] Univ Jena, D-6900 Jena, Germany
[6] Univ Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, Merseyside, England
[7] Inst Phys Globe Paris, Paris, France
[8] Univ Arizona, Tucson, AZ USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Maule; 2010; earthquake; local seismicity; aftershock distribution; subduction zone; Central Chile; seismogenic zone; CHILEAN SUBDUCTION ZONE; SUMATRA MEGATHRUST; PHASE PICKING; NAZCA PLATE; MODELS; SLIP; GAP; ARC; DEFORMATION; EVOLUTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.epsl.2011.11.034
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
On 27 February 2010 the M-w 8.8 Maule earthquake in Central Chile ruptured a seismic gap where significant strain had accumulated since 1835. Shortly after the mainshock a dense network of temporary seismic stations was installed along the whole rupture zone in order to capture the aftershock activity. Here, we present the aftershock distribution and first motion polarity focal mechanisms based on automatic detection algorithms and picking engines. By processing the seismic data between 15 March and 30 September 2010 from stations from IRIS, IPGP, GFZ and University of Liverpool we determined 20,205 hypocentres with magnitudes M-w between 1 and 5.5. Seismic activity occurs in six groups: 1.) Normal faulting outer rise events 2.) A shallow group of plate interface seismicity apparent at 25-35 km depth and 50-120 km distance to the trench with some variations between profiles. Along strike, the aftershocks occur largely within the zone of coseismic slip but extend similar to 50 km further north, and with predominantly shallowly dipping thrust mechanisms. Along dip, the events are either within the zone of coseismic slip, or downdip from it, depending on the coseismic slip model used. 3.) A third band of seismicity is observed further downdip at 40-50 km depth and further inland at 150-160 km trench perpendicular distance, with mostly shallow dipping (similar to 28 degrees) thrust focal mechanisms indicating rupture of the plate interface significantly downdip of the coseismic rupture, and presumably above the intersection of the continental Moho with the plate interface. 4.) A deep group of intermediate depth events between 80 and 120 km depth is present north of 36 degrees S. Within the Maule segment, a large portion of events during the inter-seismic phase originated from this depth range. 5.) The magmatic arc exhibits a small amount of crustal seismicity but does not appear to show significantly enhanced activity after the M-w 8.8 Maule 2010 earthquake. 6.) Pronounced crustal aftershock activity with mainly normal faulting mechanisms is found in the region of Pichilemu (similar to 34.5 degrees S). These crustal events occur in a similar to 30 km wide region with sharp inclined boundaries and oriented oblique to the trench. The best-located events describe a plane dipping to the southwest, consistent with one of the focal planes of the large normal-faulting aftershock (M-w = 6.9) on 11 March 2010. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 425
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A long time of rest at Llaima volcano following the 2010 MW 8.8 Maule earthquake, Chile
    Franco-Marin, Luis
    Lara, Luis E.
    Basualto, Daniel
    Palma, Jose Luis
    Gil-Cruz, Fernando
    Cardona, Carlos
    Farias, Cristian
    JOURNAL OF VOLCANOLOGY AND GEOTHERMAL RESEARCH, 2023, 440
  • [42] Splay fault activity revealed by aftershocks of the 2010 Mw 8.8 Maule earthquake, central Chile
    Lieser, Kathrin
    Grevemeyer, Ingo
    Lange, Dietrich
    Flueh, Ernst
    Tilmann, Frederik
    Contreras-Reyes, Eduardo
    GEOLOGY, 2014, 42 (09) : 823 - 826
  • [43] Seismic rate variations prior to the 2010 Maule, Chile MW 8.8 giant megathrust earthquake
    Benoit Derode
    Raúl Madariaga
    Jaime Campos
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [44] SEISMOLOGICAL AND TECTONIC SETTING OF THE 27 FEBRUARY 2010 OFFSHORE MAULE, CHILE EARTHQUAKE
    Lew, Marshall
    Naeim, Farzad
    Carpenter, Lauren D.
    Youssef, Nabih F.
    Rojas, Fabian
    Adaros, Macarena Schachter
    Rodolfo Saragoni, G.
    STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF TALL AND SPECIAL BUILDINGS, 2010, 19 (08): : 838 - 852
  • [45] Seismic rate variations prior to the 2010 Maule, Chile MW 8.8 giant megathrust earthquake
    Derode, Benoit
    Madariaga, Raul
    Campos, Jaime
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [46] The Seismotectonic Consequences of the Strong Maule Earthquake (February 27, 2010, Mw=8.8) in Chile: Digital Modeling of the Stress-Strain State of the Western Margin of the South American Plate
    Morozov, V. N.
    Manevich, A. I.
    GEOTECTONICS, 2023, 57 (03) : 316 - 329
  • [47] Seismic Pulses before the February 27, 2010 M=8.8 Chile Earthquake
    Sobolev, G. A.
    Migunov, I. N.
    IZVESTIYA-PHYSICS OF THE SOLID EARTH, 2024, 60 (03) : 333 - 338
  • [48] Study of thermal IR phenomena associated with 27 February 2010 Chile Mw 8.8 earthquake using MODIS data
    Kancherla, Vinod Kumar
    Mandla, Venkata Ravibabu
    Arrowsmith, Colin
    GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 33 (03) : 293 - 309
  • [49] Coseismic slip of the 2010 Mw 8.8 Great Maule, Chile, earthquake quantified by the inversion of GRACE observations
    Wang, Lei
    Shum, C. K.
    Simons, Frederik J.
    Tassara, Andres
    Erkan, Kamil
    Jekeli, Christopher
    Braun, Alexander
    Kuo, Chungyen
    Lee, Hyongki
    Yuan, Dah-Ning
    EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS, 2012, 335 : 167 - 179
  • [50] The Quake-Catcher Network Rapid Aftershock Mobilization Program Following the 2010 M 8.8 Maule, Chile Earthquake
    Chung, A. I.
    Neighbors, C.
    Belmonte, A.
    Miller, M.
    Sepulveda, H. H.
    Christensen, C.
    Jakka, R. S.
    Cochran, E. S.
    Lawrence, J. F.
    SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2011, 82 (04) : 526 - 532