Effect of weed management practices on productivity of blackgram

被引:0
|
作者
Adpawar, B. S. [1 ]
Karunakar, A. P. [1 ]
Parlawar, N. D. [1 ]
Chavhan, K. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dr Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dept Agron, Akola 444104, MS, India
关键词
Blackgram; weed intensity; weed management; yield; PHASEOLUS-MUNGO;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Beneficial effect due to integrated weed management treatment i. e. pendimethalin pre-emergence 1000 g a.i./ha+1 H 30 DAS (T(7)) was observed on growth and yield attributes of blackgram. The straw and biological yield (20.28 and 27.86 q/ha, respectively) of blackgram was maximum in Pen PRE + 1 H treatment followed by cultural treatment one hoeing at 15 DAS and 1 HW at 30 DAS (T(13)) recorded (19.44 and 27.30 q/ha, respectively), but in case of grain yield cultural treatment 1 H+1 HW recorded maximum (7.86 q/ha) followed by Pen PRE+1 H at 30 DAS (7.58 q/ha). Weed control efficiency and dry matter per plant at harvest were significantly higher in cultural treatment (T(13)) and integrated weed control treatment (T(7)). This is attributed to efficient and prolonged weed control by weedicide as well as cultural treatment (T(13)) for control of late emerging weeds. Maximum net monetary returns were obtained due to one hoeing at 15 DAS and one hand weeding at 30 DAS (Rs. 20777/ha) with benefit : cost ratio 2.60, followed by Pen PRE+1 H at 30 DAS; but in case of gross monetary returns (Rs./ha) treatments T(13) and T(7) recorded at par with each other but both were significantly superior over other treatments tested.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 102
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] EFFECT OF WEED REMOVAL ON YIELD AND NUTRIENT-UPTAKE IN PIGEONPEA AND BLACKGRAM INTERCROPPING
    TEWARI, AN
    TIWARI, KN
    SINGH, KK
    TEWARI, US
    SHARMA, JK
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 1990, 35 (04) : 341 - 345
  • [42] Effect of weed management practices on productivity, economics, quality and soil fertility of Guinea grass (Panicum maximum)-based pasture intercropped with legumes
    Ram, S.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2015, 60 (03) : 386 - 390
  • [43] Effect of weed management practices on productivity and profitability of direct-sown unpuddled rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) system
    Sharma, S. K.
    Pandey, D. K.
    Gangwar, K. S.
    Chaudhry, V. P.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2008, 78 (04): : 277 - 280
  • [44] Effect of cultivars and weed management practices on weeds, productivity and profitability in zero-till direct-seeded rice (Oryza saliva)
    Singh, Animesh
    Singh, Yashwant
    Singh, Raghavendra
    Upadhyay, Pravin Kumar
    Kumar, Rakesh
    Singh, Rajiv Kumar
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2019, 89 (02): : 353 - 359
  • [45] Effect of best management practices on the performance and productivity of small firms
    Nisar, Tahir M.
    Kumar, Niraj
    Prabhakar, Guru
    PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2019, 30 (10-12) : 919 - 934
  • [46] Effect of fertilizer, weed control and row spacing on summer blackgram (Phaseolus mungo)
    Mishra, M
    Misra, A
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 1995, 40 (03) : 434 - 438
  • [47] Productivity and profitability of direct-seeded rice under varying establishment methods and weed management practices
    Pratap, Vijay
    Verma, S. K.
    Dass, Anchal
    Yadav, Deepak Kumar
    Jaysawal, Peeyush Kumar
    Madan, A. J.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2021, 91 (04): : 537 - 541
  • [48] Developing efficient weed management practices for higher productivity and profitability in aerobic rice (Oryza sativa) cultivation
    Ghosh, A.
    Singh, R. K.
    Singh, O. N.
    Samal, P.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2018, 88 (10): : 1532 - 1536
  • [49] Management Practices and Productivity in Germany
    Broszeit, Sandra
    Laible, Marie-Christine
    Fritsch, Ursula
    Goerg, Holger
    GERMAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2019, 20 (04) : E657 - E705
  • [50] Effect of weed management practices on growth and fibre yield of jute (Corchorus capsularis)
    Mishra, GC
    Bhol, BB
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 1996, 41 (01) : 132 - 135