An Analysis on the Influence of R&D Fiscal and Tax Subsidies on Regional Innovation Efficiency: Empirical Evidence from China

被引:16
|
作者
Liu, Weijiang [1 ]
Bai, Yue [2 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, Ctr Quantitat Econ, Changchun 130012, Peoples R China
[2] Jilin Univ, Sch Business, Changchun 130012, Peoples R China
关键词
regional innovation efficiency; DEA-Malmquist; R&D fiscal and tax subsidies; government subsidies; pretax additional deduction policy; GOVERNMENT SUPPORT; INDUSTRIES; SYSTEMS; IMPACT; MATTER; FIRMS;
D O I
10.3390/su132212707
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
To promote the National Mid-andLong-Term Scientific and Technical Development Program, utilizing the technical innovation data from 30 provinces of China from2002-2016, this paper evaluates the inter-provincial differences of China's regional innovation efficiency from four aspects of technical efficiency, efficiency index change, returns to scale, and projection analysis by using the DEA-Malmquist index method and constructs of the DEA-Tobit random response model to explore the impact of government funding on regional innovation efficiency. The research results show that: (1) The local development of regional innovation efficiency in China is unbalanced, and the level of pure technical efficiency restricts the improvement of innovation efficiency. (2) In the prophase of the scientific and technical development plan, technological progress has led to the growth of total factor productivity, resulting in the formation of scale effect; in the later stage, the scale return shows an overall increasing trend, and the continuous expansion of technological scale and opportunities has improved the regional innovation efficiency. (3) The R & D fiscal and tax subsidies have policy sustainability, and the direct government funding can significantly improve innovation efficiency, while the enterprises investment is opposite, and the pretax additional deduction has a negative but not significant impact. The government should give priority to direct subsidy and supplemented by tax preference, making reasonable policy allocations to expand the policy effect.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The allocation and effectiveness of China's R&D subsidies - Evidence from listed firms
    Boeing, Philipp
    RESEARCH POLICY, 2016, 45 (09) : 1774 - 1789
  • [42] DO R&D SUBSIDIES IMPROVE OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE? NEW EVIDENCE FROM CHINA*
    Zhou, Qingjie
    Du, Mingyue
    Chen, Zhenling
    Miao, Tianshun
    Yang, Guoge
    PRAGUE ECONOMIC PAPERS, 2022, 31 (05): : 398 - 416
  • [43] Do R&D Subsidies Support Innovation or Imitation? Evidence from Four EU Countries
    Stanek, Rostislav
    Kvasnicka, Michal
    Krcal, Ondrej
    EKONOMICKY CASOPIS, 2018, 66 (09): : 909 - 924
  • [44] The certification effect of R&D subsidies from the central and local governments: evidence from China
    Wei, Jiang
    Zuo, Yan
    R & D MANAGEMENT, 2018, 48 (05) : 615 - 626
  • [45] The relative effectiveness of R&D tax credits and R&D subsidies: A comparative meta-regression analysis
    Dimos, Christos
    Pugh, Geoff
    Hisarciklilar, Mehtap
    Talam, Ema
    Jackson, Ian
    TECHNOVATION, 2022, 115
  • [46] Assessing the impact of R&D Investments, government subsidies on energy efficiency: empirical analysis from the Chinese listed firms
    Zhang, Jianhui
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (02) : 3606 - 3620
  • [47] R&D, firm size and innovation: an empirical analysis
    Shefer, D
    Frenkel, A
    TECHNOVATION, 2005, 25 (01) : 25 - 32
  • [48] Do R&D subsidies stimulate or displace private R&D? Evidence from Israel
    Lach, S
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 50 (04): : 369 - 390
  • [49] Limits of tax regulation: Evidence from strategic R&D classification and the R&D tax credit
    Laplante, Stacie K.
    Skaife, Hollis A.
    Swenson, Laura A.
    Wangerin, Daniel D.
    JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2019, 38 (02) : 89 - 105
  • [50] R&D subsidies and private R&D expenditures: evidence from Italian manufacturing data
    Carboni, Oliviero
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2011, 25 (04) : 419 - 439