Family support for stroke: one year follow up of a randomised controlled trial

被引:26
|
作者
Mant, J
Winner, S
Roche, J
Wade, DT
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Dept Primary Care & Gen Practice, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[2] Radcliffe Infirm, Dept Clin Geratol, Oxford OX2 6HE, England
[3] Oxford Brookes Univ, Sch Hlth & Social Care, Oxford OX3 0BP, England
[4] Oxford Ctr Enablement, Neurol Rehabil Serv, Oxford, England
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1136/jnnp.2004.048991
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There is evidence that family support can benefit carers of stroke patients, but not the patients themselves. Objective: To extend the follow up of a single blind randomised controlled trial of family support for stroke patients and carers to one year to ascertain whether there were any late effects of the intervention. Methods: The study was a randomised controlled trial. Patients admitted to hospital with acute stroke who had a close carer were assigned to receive family support or normal care. Families were visited at home by a researcher 12 months after the stroke, and a series of questionnaires was administered to patient and carer. Results: The benefits to carers mostly persisted, though they were no longer statistically significant because some patients were lost to follow up. There was no evidence of any effects on patients. Conclusion: Family support is effective for carers, but different approaches need to be considered to alleviate the psychosocial problems of stroke patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1006 / 1008
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of a stroke family support organiser - A randomized controlled trial
    Lincoln, NB
    Francis, VA
    Lilley, SA
    Sharma, JC
    Summerfield, M
    STROKE, 2003, 34 (01) : 116 - 121
  • [42] Assessing loss to follow-up in the MObile Technology for Improved Family Planning (MOTIF) randomised controlled trial
    Chris Smith
    Christopher Jarvis
    Caroline Free
    Trials, 18
  • [43] Assessing loss to follow-up in the MObile Technology for Improved Family Planning (MOTIF) randomised controlled trial
    Smith, Chris
    Jarvis, Christopher
    Free, Caroline
    TRIALS, 2017, 18
  • [44] Outpatient management of childhood asthma by paediatrician or asthma nurse:: randomised controlled study with one year follow up
    Kamps, AWA
    Brand, PLP
    Kimpen, JLL
    Maillé, AR
    Overgoor-van de Groes, AW
    van Helsdingen-Peek, LCJAM
    Roorda, RJ
    THORAX, 2003, 58 (11) : 968 - 973
  • [45] Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty; a pragmatic randomised controlled trial reporting outcomes up to 2 year follow up
    Tasker, Andrew
    Hassaballa, Mohammed
    Murray, James
    Lancaster, Sarah
    Artz, Neil
    Harries, William
    Porteous, Andrew
    KNEE, 2014, 21 (01): : 189 - 193
  • [46] Evaluation study on prophylaxis: A randomised Italian trial (ESPRIT). One-year follow-up report
    Gringeri, A
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 1998, 91 (03) : S8 - S8
  • [47] Five-Year Follow-up of a Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Subtotal With Total Abdominal Hysterectomy
    Andersen, L. L.
    Zobbe, V.
    Ottesen, B.
    Gluud, C.
    Tabor, A.
    Gimbel, H.
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2015, 70 (08) : 495 - 496
  • [48] Long term effects of antenatal betamethasone on lung function: 30 year follow up of a randomised controlled trial
    Dalziel, S. R.
    Rea, H. H.
    Walker, N. K.
    Parag, V.
    Mantell, C.
    Rodgers, A.
    Harding, J. E.
    THORAX, 2006, 61 (08) : 678 - 683
  • [49] Textured or smooth implants for breast augmentation? Three year follow-up of a prospective randomised controlled trial
    Malata, CM
    Feldberg, L
    Coleman, DJ
    Foo, ITH
    Sharpe, DT
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1997, 50 (02): : 99 - 105
  • [50] RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL (RCT) OF CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT OF POSTNATAL URINARY AND FAECAL INCONTINENCE: TWELVE YEAR FOLLOW UP
    Glazener, C.
    Wilson, D.
    Macarthur, C.
    Lancashire, R.
    Herbison, P.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2009, 20 : S79 - S79