Transit-oriented development in an urban rail transportation corridor

被引:31
|
作者
Peng, Ya-Ting [1 ]
Li, Zhi-Chun [1 ]
Choi, Keechoo [2 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Management, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Ajou Univ, Dept Transportat Engn, San 5 Woncheon Dong, Suwon 442749, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Transit-oriented development; Rail transportation corridor; Households' residential location choices; Housing market; Public and private regimes; Social welfare; EFFECTIVE 2ND-BEST REMEDY; LAND-USE; MONOCENTRIC CITY; OPEN SPACE; EQUILIBRIUM; CONGESTION; DENSITY; DESIGN; MODEL; RIDERSHIP;
D O I
10.1016/j.trb.2017.03.011
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Transit-oriented development (TOD) has been recognized as an important avenue for creating a green transportation system. This paper addresses TOD investment issue in terms of the location, number and size of the TOD zones along a rail line. An urban system equilibrium problem with TOD investment is first formulated. Two social welfare maximization models, which take into account different investment regimes for TOD projects (i.e., public and private), are then proposed for optimizing TOD investment schemes along a rail line and train service frequency on that line. In the public regime model, the government is responsible for the investment cost of TOD projects, which is borne by the private property developers in the private regime model. The proposed models explicitly consider the interactions among the government, property developers and households in the urban system, together with the effects of the TOD investment on households' residential location choices and housing market. The population thresholds for investing in a TOD project under the public and private regimes are also identified. The findings show that the TOD investment can cause population agglomeration at the TOD zones and a compact city; households and the society can benefit from the TOD investment; and the private TOD investment regime outperforms the public regime in terms of total social welfare of urban system. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 290
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Possibility of Reorganising Transit-oriented Development
    Aoki, Takashi
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW FOR SPATIAL PLANNING AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 10 (04): : 55 - 78
  • [32] Urban Planning for Transit-Oriented Development: An application in the Naples metropolitan area
    Carpentieri, Gerardo
    Papa, Rocco
    Guida, Carmen
    EUROPEAN TRANSPORT-TRASPORTI EUROPEI, 2021, (85):
  • [33] PROSPECT OF THE TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IN CHINA
    Chen, Xueming
    MANAGEMENT RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2010, 2 (01): : 83 - 93
  • [34] Countering sprawl with transit-oriented development
    Belzer, D
    Autler, G
    ISSUES IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 19 (01) : 51 - 58
  • [35] Suburbanization and transit-oriented development in China
    Cervero, Robert
    Day, Jennifer
    TRANSPORT POLICY, 2008, 15 (05) : 315 - 323
  • [36] Unraveling the diversity in transit-oriented development
    Choi, Yunkyung
    Guhathakurta, Subhrajit
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2024, 182
  • [37] Policy challenges for transit-oriented development
    Hakkaart, Aaron
    Morrissey, John Edward
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-URBAN DESIGN AND PLANNING, 2014, 167 (04) : 175 - 184
  • [38] Overcoming the barriers to Transit-Oriented Development
    Bolleter, Julian Alexander
    Myers, Zoe
    Hooper, Paula
    AUSTRALIAN PLANNER, 2021, 57 (3-4) : 188 - 205
  • [39] From transit-adjacent to transit-oriented development
    Renne, John L.
    LOCAL ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 14 (01) : 1 - 15
  • [40] Transit-Oriented Land Planning Model Considering Sustainability of Mass Rail Transit
    Li, Yan
    Guo, H. L.
    Li, Heng
    Xu, G. H.
    Wang, Z. R.
    Kong, C. W.
    JOURNAL OF URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-ASCE, 2010, 136 (03): : 243 - 248