A Randomized Comparison of Modified Intermediate-dose Ara-C versus High-dose Ara-C in Post-remission Therapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia

被引:0
|
作者
Fukushima, Toshihiro [1 ]
Urasaki, Yoshimasa [2 ]
Yamaguchi, Masaki [3 ]
Ueda, Mikio [3 ]
Morinaga, Koji [4 ]
Haba, Toshihiro [4 ]
Sugiyama, Toshiro [5 ]
Nakao, Shinji [6 ]
Origasa, Hideki [7 ]
Umehara, Hisanori [1 ]
Ueda, Takanori [2 ]
机构
[1] Kanazawa Med Univ, Dept Hematol & Immunol, Uchinada, Ishikawa 9200293, Japan
[2] Univ Fukui, Dept Hematol & Oncol, Fukui 910, Japan
[3] Ishikawa Prefectural Cent Hosp, Dept Hematol, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan
[4] Fukui Prefectural Hosp, Fukui, Japan
[5] Toyama Univ, Dept Internal Med 3, Toyama 930, Japan
[6] Kanazawa Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Div Canc Med, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 9201192, Japan
[7] Toyama Univ, Div Biostat, Toyama 930, Japan
关键词
Acute myeloid leukemia; post-remission therapy; cytarabine; Ara-C; CYTOSINE-ARABINOSIDE; CYTARABINE; CHEMOTHERAPY; RESISTANCE; REMISSION; LYMPHOMA; ADULTS; TRIAL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: We conducted a prospective, multicenter cooperative study to compare two courses of modified intermediate-dose cytarabine (Ara-C) (mIDAC; Ara-C at a dose of 1.0 g/m(2) every 12 hours for 5 days) versus high-dose Ara-C (HDAC; Ara-C at a dose of 2.0 g/m(2) every 12 hours for 5 days) in post-remission therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) to confirm the post-remission antileukemic efficacy and safety of mIDAC. Patients and Methods: Twenty-six newly diagnosed patients with AML underwent remission induction therapy consisted of behenoyl Ara-C, mitoxantrone, etoposide, and 6-mercaptopurine. Post-remission therapy included four courses of consolidation and four courses of intensification. Patients who achieved complete remission (CR) were randomly assigned to mIDAC or HDAC for the second course of consolidation. The third course of intensification was the same as the second course of consolidation. Other post-remission therapies were the same in each group. Results: Twenty-two patients (84.6%) achieved CR and 21 patients were randomly assigned to receive either mIDAC (n=11) or HDAC (n=10). The predicted 4-year relapse-free survival for the mIDAC group and for the HDAC group were 49% and 56%, respectively (p=0.86). Although HDAC developed severe leukocytopenia compared to mIDAC, there were no significant differences between HDAC and mIDAC in the incidence of >= grade 3 and >= grade 4 documented infections. The mean lowest white blood cell count (WBC) after HDAC was significantly lower than that after mIDAC (0.208 +/- 0.120 x 10(3)/mm(3) and 0.459 +/- 0.333 x 10(3)/mm(3), respectively, p<0.05). The time to WBC recovery to 2.0 x 10(3)/mm(3) after HDAC was significantly longer than that after mIDAC (34.3 +/- 12.1 days and 27.1 +/- 9.5 days, respectively, p<0.05). Conclusion: This study suggests that mIDAC may have an equivalent post-remission antileukemic efficacy to HDAC with less myelosuppression for AML patients.
引用
收藏
页码:643 / 647
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Postremission therapy with one course of high-dose Ara-c for adult acute myeloid leukemia.
    Fagundes, EM
    Glória, ABF
    Viana, MB
    BLOOD, 1999, 94 (10) : 228B - 228B
  • [22] VITAMIN-A AND OR HIGH-DOSE ARA-C IN THE MAINTENANCE OF REMISSION IN ACUTE MYELOGENOUS LEUKEMIA IN CHILDREN
    LIE, SO
    SLORDAHL, SH
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 1984, 33 (03): : 256 - 259
  • [23] TREATMENT OF MENINGEAL LEUKEMIA WITH HIGH-DOSE ARA-C (HIDAC)
    MORRA, E
    LAZZARINO, M
    INVERARDI, D
    PAGNUCCO, G
    BERNASCONI, C
    LEUKEMIA RESEARCH, 1986, 10 (01) : 113 - 113
  • [24] HIGH-DOSE ARA-C RELATED LEUKOENCEPHALOPATHY
    HWANG, TL
    YUNG, WKA
    LEE, YY
    BORIT, A
    FIELDS, WS
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 1986, 3 (04) : 335 - 339
  • [25] TREATMENT OF REFRACTORY AND RECIDIVIST ACUTE MYELOID-LEUKEMIA WITH HIGH-DOSE ARA-C AND AMSACRINE
    KALHS, P
    KOS, M
    JAGER, U
    SCHWARZINGER, I
    BETTELHEIM, P
    PANZER, S
    HINTERBERGER, W
    NEUMANN, E
    LECHNER, K
    ONKOLOGIE, 1987, 10 (05): : 279 - 280
  • [26] HIGH-DOSE ARA-C AND ETOPOSIDE IN REFRACTORY OR RELAPSING ACUTE-LEUKEMIA
    FREUND, M
    LINK, H
    DIEDRICH, H
    LEBLANC, S
    WILKE, HJ
    POLIWODA, H
    CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1991, 28 (06) : 487 - 490
  • [27] CELL KINETIC ASPECTS OF HIGH-DOSE THERAPY WITH ARA-C
    SMETS, LA
    CYTOMETRY, 1981, 2 (02): : 128 - 128
  • [28] Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation compared with high-dose Ara-C postremission therapy in acute myeloid leukemia
    Link, H
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 1998, 22 : S16 - S16
  • [29] Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation compared with high-dose ARA-C postremission therapy in acute myeloid leukemia
    Link, H
    Ehninger, G
    SchonrockNabulsi, P
    Gramatzki, M
    Daoud, A
    Tischler, J
    Brack, N
    Otremba, B
    Lutz, M
    Gackle, R
    Ohl, S
    Heidemann, E
    Gieseler, F
    Loffler, B
    Weiss, J
    Geer, T
    Wandt, H
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 1996, 93 : 840 - 840
  • [30] PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY ASSOCIATED WITH HIGH-DOSE ARA-C THERAPY
    BORGEAT, A
    DEMURALT, B
    STALDER, M
    CANCER, 1986, 58 (04) : 852 - 854