A Randomized Comparison of Modified Intermediate-dose Ara-C versus High-dose Ara-C in Post-remission Therapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia

被引:0
|
作者
Fukushima, Toshihiro [1 ]
Urasaki, Yoshimasa [2 ]
Yamaguchi, Masaki [3 ]
Ueda, Mikio [3 ]
Morinaga, Koji [4 ]
Haba, Toshihiro [4 ]
Sugiyama, Toshiro [5 ]
Nakao, Shinji [6 ]
Origasa, Hideki [7 ]
Umehara, Hisanori [1 ]
Ueda, Takanori [2 ]
机构
[1] Kanazawa Med Univ, Dept Hematol & Immunol, Uchinada, Ishikawa 9200293, Japan
[2] Univ Fukui, Dept Hematol & Oncol, Fukui 910, Japan
[3] Ishikawa Prefectural Cent Hosp, Dept Hematol, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan
[4] Fukui Prefectural Hosp, Fukui, Japan
[5] Toyama Univ, Dept Internal Med 3, Toyama 930, Japan
[6] Kanazawa Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Div Canc Med, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 9201192, Japan
[7] Toyama Univ, Div Biostat, Toyama 930, Japan
关键词
Acute myeloid leukemia; post-remission therapy; cytarabine; Ara-C; CYTOSINE-ARABINOSIDE; CYTARABINE; CHEMOTHERAPY; RESISTANCE; REMISSION; LYMPHOMA; ADULTS; TRIAL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: We conducted a prospective, multicenter cooperative study to compare two courses of modified intermediate-dose cytarabine (Ara-C) (mIDAC; Ara-C at a dose of 1.0 g/m(2) every 12 hours for 5 days) versus high-dose Ara-C (HDAC; Ara-C at a dose of 2.0 g/m(2) every 12 hours for 5 days) in post-remission therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) to confirm the post-remission antileukemic efficacy and safety of mIDAC. Patients and Methods: Twenty-six newly diagnosed patients with AML underwent remission induction therapy consisted of behenoyl Ara-C, mitoxantrone, etoposide, and 6-mercaptopurine. Post-remission therapy included four courses of consolidation and four courses of intensification. Patients who achieved complete remission (CR) were randomly assigned to mIDAC or HDAC for the second course of consolidation. The third course of intensification was the same as the second course of consolidation. Other post-remission therapies were the same in each group. Results: Twenty-two patients (84.6%) achieved CR and 21 patients were randomly assigned to receive either mIDAC (n=11) or HDAC (n=10). The predicted 4-year relapse-free survival for the mIDAC group and for the HDAC group were 49% and 56%, respectively (p=0.86). Although HDAC developed severe leukocytopenia compared to mIDAC, there were no significant differences between HDAC and mIDAC in the incidence of >= grade 3 and >= grade 4 documented infections. The mean lowest white blood cell count (WBC) after HDAC was significantly lower than that after mIDAC (0.208 +/- 0.120 x 10(3)/mm(3) and 0.459 +/- 0.333 x 10(3)/mm(3), respectively, p<0.05). The time to WBC recovery to 2.0 x 10(3)/mm(3) after HDAC was significantly longer than that after mIDAC (34.3 +/- 12.1 days and 27.1 +/- 9.5 days, respectively, p<0.05). Conclusion: This study suggests that mIDAC may have an equivalent post-remission antileukemic efficacy to HDAC with less myelosuppression for AML patients.
引用
收藏
页码:643 / 647
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SATURATION OF ARA-CTP ACCUMULATION DURING HIGH-DOSE ARA-C THERAPY - PHARMACOLOGICAL RATIONALE FOR INTERMEDIATE-DOSE ARA-C
    PLUNKETT, W
    LILIEMARK, JO
    ESTEY, E
    KEATING, MJ
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 1987, 14 (02) : 159 - 166
  • [2] Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation compared with high-dose ARA-C post-remission therapy for acute myeloid leukemia
    Link, H
    Ehninger, G
    Hübner, G
    Soucek, S
    Schönrock-Nabulsi, P
    Gramatzki, M
    Franke, A
    Einsele, H
    Tischler, J
    Brack, N
    Otremba, B
    Lutz, M
    Gäckle, R
    Öhl, S
    Heidemann, E
    Gieseler, F
    Löffler, B
    Weiss, J
    Geer, T
    Wandt, H
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 23 : S13 - S13
  • [3] EFFICACY OF HIGH-DOSE AND INTERMEDIATE-DOSE ARA-C IN PATIENTS WITH SECONDARY AML
    LEITHA, T
    JAGER, U
    SCHWARZINGER, I
    BOGNAR, H
    BETTELHEIM, P
    GEISSLER, K
    HINTERBERGER, W
    KOS, M
    PABINGER, I
    PANZER, S
    NEUMANN, E
    LECHNER, K
    BLUT, 1986, 53 (03): : 141 - 141
  • [4] MODULATION OF CYTOSINE-ARABINOSIDE (ARA-C) AND HIGH-DOSE ARA-C IN ACUTE-LEUKEMIA
    ZITTOUN, R
    MARIE, JP
    ZITTOUN, J
    MARQUET, J
    HAANEN, C
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 1985, 12 (02) : 139 - 143
  • [5] INTERMEDIATE-DOSE ARA-C M-AMSA FOR REMISSION INDUCTION AND HIGH-DOSE ARA-C M-AMSA FOR INTENSIVE CONSOLIDATION IN RELAPSED AND REFRACTORY ADULT ACUTE MYELOGENOUS LEUKEMIA (AML)
    JEHN, U
    HEINEMANN, V
    WILMANNS, W
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 1989, 9 (01) : 119 - 124
  • [6] HIGH-DOSE ARA-C THERAPY - A REVIEW
    GASSMANN, W
    SCHMITZ, N
    LOFFLER, H
    ONKOLOGIE, 1985, 8 (01): : 8 - &
  • [7] High-dose ara-C in older adults with acute leukemia
    Herzig, RH
    LEUKEMIA, 1996, 10 : S10 - S11
  • [8] MAMSA + HIGH-DOSE ARA-C IN ACUTE-LEUKEMIA
    ZITTOUN, R
    INVESTIGATIONAL NEW DRUGS, 1984, 2 (01) : 110 - 110
  • [9] CLINICAL-PHARMACOLOGY OF INTERMEDIATE DOSE ARA-C (ID ARA-C) IN THE TREATMENT OF ACUTE MYELOID-LEUKEMIA IN RELAPSE
    VANPROOYEN, HC
    DEKKER, AW
    PUNT, K
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 1985, 60 (02) : 355 - 356
  • [10] DAE (DAUNORUBICIN, ARA-C, AND ETOPOSIDE) AND INTERMEDIATE DOSE ARA-C FOR REMISSION INDUCTION AND CONSOLIDATION TREATMENT OF ADULT PATIENTS WITH ACUTE MYELOID-LEUKEMIA
    HWANG, WL
    YOUNG, JH
    GAU, JP
    HU, HT
    TSAI, YT
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 1992, 15 (06): : 531 - 534