Evaluating the Potential Economic Efficiency of Project Delivery Options

被引:3
|
作者
DeCorla-Souza, Patrick [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Douglass B. [3 ]
机构
[1] US Dept Transportat, Build Amer Bur, 1200 New Jersey Ave SE, Washington, DC 20590 USA
[2] US Dept Transportat, FHWA Ctr Innovat Finance Support, 1200 New Jersey Ave SE, Washington, DC 20590 USA
[3] Volpe Natl Transportat Syst Ctr, Econ Anal Div, 55 Broadway, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
关键词
D O I
10.3141/2606-15
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper illustrates a comparison of the incremental costs and benefits of alternative delivery options for highway projects that used the FHWA's P3-VALUE analytic tool for much of the computation. The hypothetical example project consists of (a) upgrading an urban freeway with added express toll lanes, (b) possibly delivering the project via a public-private partnership concession, (c) possibly transferring the revenue risk back to the public agency via availability payments (APs), and (d) possibly substituting a hybrid payment mechanism that compensates the operator with a fixed AP plus shadow tolls paid on the basis of person throughput. Under the hybrid payment mechanism, the concessionaire would continue to set toll rates to ensure efficient operations (as under a normal toll concession), but all toll revenue would go to the public agency, as in an AP concession. The multipart payment strategy would potentially restore incentives for ensuring optimal utilization of the facility. The goal is to maximize economic efficiency, which is assessed by using benefitcost analysis. The evaluation explores the conditions under which the features considered would be incrementally beneficial.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 121
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] GENERATING DISTRIBUTIONS AND DATA: EVALUATING ONLINE, FREEWARE OPTIONS FOR HEALTH ECONOMIC MODELS
    McGhan, W. F.
    Willey, V. J.
    Eapen, K.
    Khole, T.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (03) : A50 - A50
  • [42] Evaluating the use of alternative project delivery methods in the UAE construction industry
    Monir, ESS
    Proceedings of 2005 International Conference on Construction & Real Estate Management, Vols 1 and 2: CHALLENGE OF INNOVATION IN CONSTRUCTION AND REAL ESTATE, 2005, : 219 - 223
  • [43] Evaluating the effect of TQM on MEP construction productivity and project delivery in Dubai
    Small, Edgar P.
    Bakry, Ibrahim
    Ayyash, Lu'ay
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21 (10) : 1061 - 1075
  • [44] Evaluating daylighting potential and energy efficiency in a classroom building
    Krueger, E. L.
    Fonseca, S. D.
    JOURNAL OF RENEWABLE AND SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2011, 3 (06)
  • [45] Evaluating the potential for high thermoelectric efficiency of silver selenide
    Day, Tristan
    Drymiotis, Fivos
    Zhang, Tiansong
    Rhodes, Daniel
    Shi, Xun
    Chen, Lidong
    Snyder, G. Jeffrey
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C, 2013, 1 (45) : 7568 - 7573
  • [46] Evaluating the environmental and economic sustainability of energy efficiency measures in buildings
    Weldu, Yemane W.
    Al-Ghamdi, Sami G.
    2019 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUTURE ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY, 2019, 257
  • [47] Evaluating the Economic Efficiency of the Technologies for Greenhouse Gas Footprint Reduction
    Pintaric, Zorka Novak
    Varbanov, Petar S.
    Klemes, Jiri J.
    Kravanja, Zdravko
    PRES15: PROCESS INTEGRATION, MODELLING AND OPTIMISATION FOR ENERGY SAVING AND POLLUTION REDUCTION, 2015, 45 : 535 - 540
  • [48] Evaluating the economic and environmental efficiency of ports: Evidence from Italy
    Castellano, Rosalia
    Ferretti, Marco
    Musella, Gaetano
    Risitano, Marcello
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 271
  • [49] Evaluation of economic efficiency of the orchards investment project with respect to the risk
    Sojkova, Zlata
    Adamickova, Izabela
    AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-ZEMEDELSKA EKONOMIKA, 2011, 57 (12): : 600 - 608
  • [50] The ALMTech Project: Initial Economic Evaluation of the Potential Benefits
    Griffith, Garry
    Zhang, Yue
    Mounter, Stuart
    AUSTRALASIAN AGRIBUSINESS REVIEW, 2022, 30 : 1 - 25