Evaluating the Potential Economic Efficiency of Project Delivery Options

被引:3
|
作者
DeCorla-Souza, Patrick [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Douglass B. [3 ]
机构
[1] US Dept Transportat, Build Amer Bur, 1200 New Jersey Ave SE, Washington, DC 20590 USA
[2] US Dept Transportat, FHWA Ctr Innovat Finance Support, 1200 New Jersey Ave SE, Washington, DC 20590 USA
[3] Volpe Natl Transportat Syst Ctr, Econ Anal Div, 55 Broadway, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
关键词
D O I
10.3141/2606-15
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper illustrates a comparison of the incremental costs and benefits of alternative delivery options for highway projects that used the FHWA's P3-VALUE analytic tool for much of the computation. The hypothetical example project consists of (a) upgrading an urban freeway with added express toll lanes, (b) possibly delivering the project via a public-private partnership concession, (c) possibly transferring the revenue risk back to the public agency via availability payments (APs), and (d) possibly substituting a hybrid payment mechanism that compensates the operator with a fixed AP plus shadow tolls paid on the basis of person throughput. Under the hybrid payment mechanism, the concessionaire would continue to set toll rates to ensure efficient operations (as under a normal toll concession), but all toll revenue would go to the public agency, as in an AP concession. The multipart payment strategy would potentially restore incentives for ensuring optimal utilization of the facility. The goal is to maximize economic efficiency, which is assessed by using benefitcost analysis. The evaluation explores the conditions under which the features considered would be incrementally beneficial.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 121
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Options for evaluating the project efficiency: technospheric security factor
    Skvortsova, N.
    Matys, E.
    Uze, E.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONSTRUCTION, ARCHITECTURE AND TECHNOSPHERE SAFETY (ICCATS 2020), 2020, 962
  • [2] Realized Economic Efficiency of Road Project Delivery Systems
    Koppinen, Tiina
    Lahdenpera, Pertti
    JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2007, 13 (04) : 321 - 329
  • [3] Evaluating economic efficiency of a water buyback program: The Klamath irrigation project
    Elbakidze, Levan
    Fa'anunu, Benjamin
    Mamula, Aaron
    Taylor, R. Garth
    RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2017, 48 : 68 - 82
  • [4] IMPLEMENTATION OF APMS - PROJECT DELIVERY OPTIONS
    VOLTURO, CA
    AUTOMATED PEOPLE MOVERS II: NEW LINKS FOR LAND USE - AUTOMATED PEOPLE MOVER OPPORTUNITIES FOR MAJOR ACTIVITY CENTERS, 1989, : 305 - 311
  • [5] Project delivery in the mining industry - options and trends
    McCosker, B
    JOURNAL OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN INSTITUTE OF MINING AND METALLURGY, 2002, 102 (07): : 397 - 403
  • [6] Evaluating Integrated Project Delivery Using the Project Quarterback Rating
    El Asmar, Mounir
    Hanna, Awad S.
    Loh, Wei-Yin
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 142 (01)
  • [7] Project on costing information delivery options available to libraries
    不详
    PROGRAM-AUTOMATED LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 1996, 30 (02): : 200 - 201
  • [8] Modelling of Efficiency Evaluation of Traditional Project Delivery Methods and Integrated Project Delivery (IPD)
    Trach, Roman
    Polonski, Mieczyslaw
    Hrytsiuk, Petro
    3RD WORLD MULTIDISCIPLINARY CIVIL ENGINEERING, ARCHITECTURE, URBAN PLANNING SYMPOSIUM (WMCAUS 2018), 2019, 471
  • [9] Evaluating the efficiency of new technology in investment project
    Bersenev, N.P.
    Promyshlennoe i Grazhdanskoe Stroitel'stvo, 2001, (02):
  • [10] The application of real options model on evaluating land readjustment project
    Tu, Hsin-Nan
    Wang, Li-Hsun
    Lin, Chu-Hsiung
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICS & MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, 2012, 15 (01): : 49 - 59