Extrusion as a pretreatment to increase biogas production

被引:108
|
作者
Hjorth, Maibritt [1 ]
Granitz, Kay [2 ]
Adamsen, Anders P. S. [1 ]
Moller, Henrik B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Biosyst Engn, DK-8860 Tjele, Denmark
[2] ADAP Rinderzucht GmbH, D-18320 Ahrenshagen, Germany
关键词
Deep litter; Energy; Extruder; Methane; Particle size; WASTE ACTIVATED-SLUDGE; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.biortech.2010.11.128
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Application of an extruder to increase the methane yield in a biogas production was examined, and large potential was proved. An extruder was tested on five agricultural biomass types, represented by 13 samples. The samples were analyzed for temperature, maximum particle size, biogas potential, and energy consumption. The extruder treatment increased biomass temperature by 5-35 degrees C. Large particles (> 1 mm I were most affected by the extruder. Extrusion accelerated the degradation of slowly degradable organic compounds, and some otherwise nondegradable organic compounds were also degraded. The methane yield increased significantly: by 18-70% after 28 days, and by 9-28% after 90 days. The electrical energy equivalent of the extra methane, after subtracting the energy used by the extruder, resulted in energy surpluses of 6-68%. By day 90, the energy-efficiency of the extrusion process was ranked as follows: glass = straw = solids of flocculated manure < solids of screw-pressed manure < deep litter. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4989 / 4994
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Improvement of biogas production from pine wood by alkali pretreatment
    Salehian, Peyman
    Karimi, Keikhosro
    Zilouei, Hamid
    Jeihanipour, Azam
    FUEL, 2013, 106 : 484 - 489
  • [42] Optimization and biokinetic studies on pretreatment of sludge for enhancing biogas production
    Divyalakshmi, P.
    Murugan, D.
    Sivarajan, M.
    Sivasamy, A.
    Saravanan, P.
    Rai, C. L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 14 (04) : 813 - 822
  • [43] ALKALINE PRETREATMENT OF SPRUCE AND BIRCH TO IMPROVE BIOETHANOL AND BIOGAS PRODUCTION
    Mirahmadi, Kambiz
    Kabir, Maryam Mohseni
    Jeihanipour, Azam
    Karimi, Keikhosro
    Taherzadeh, Mohammad J.
    BIORESOURCES, 2010, 5 (02): : 928 - 938
  • [44] Pretreatment strategies for enhanced biogas production from lignocellulosic biomass
    Abraham, Amith
    Mathew, Anil K.
    Park, Hyojung
    Choi, Okkyoung
    Sindhu, Raveendran
    Parameswaran, Binod
    Pandey, Ashok
    Park, Jung Han
    Sang, Byoung-In
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 301
  • [45] Influence of Aerobic Pretreatment of Poultry Manure on the Biogas Production Process
    Rubezius, Mantas
    Venslauskas, Kestutis
    Navickas, Kestutis
    Bleizgys, Rolandas
    PROCESSES, 2020, 8 (09)
  • [46] Using an Amylase Pretreatment of Pig Manure to Enhance Biogas Production
    Li, Jianchang
    Sun, Kewei
    He, Juan
    Chen, Qiuling
    Li, Jianchang
    2011 ASIA-PACIFIC POWER AND ENERGY ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (APPEEC), 2011,
  • [47] Hydrothermal pretreatment of poultry litter for biogas production1
    de Oliveira, Mayara P.
    Paranhos, Aline G. de O.
    Adarme, Oscar F. H.
    de Aquino, Sergio F.
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENGENHARIA AGRICOLA E AMBIENTAL, 2023, 27 (11): : 873 - 881
  • [48] Fenton's oxidation pretreatment of landfill leachate for biogas production
    Nie, Jing
    Gang, Daniel D.
    Dufreche, Stephen
    Subramaniam, Ramalingam
    Bajpai, Rakesh
    Zappi, Mark
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2013, 245
  • [49] Enhancement of biogas production rate from bioplastics by alkaline pretreatment
    Garcia-Depraect, Octavio
    Lebreroa, Raquel
    Martinez-Mendoza, Leonardo J.
    Rodriguez-Vega, Sara
    Borner, Rosa Aragao
    Borner, Tim
    Munoz, Raul
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2023, 164 : 154 - 161
  • [50] Experiments on pretreatment and anaerobic digestion of asparagus stalk for biogas production
    Sun C.
    Liu R.
    Qin G.
    Nongye Jixie Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery, 2010, 41 (08): : 94 - 99+120