Laminaria vs. vaginal misoprostol for cervical preparation before A second-trimester surgical abortion: a randomized clinical trial

被引:6
|
作者
Sagiv, Ron [1 ]
Mizrachi, Yossi
Glickman, Hagit
Kerner, Ram
Keidar, Ran
Bar, Jacob
Golan, Abraham
机构
[1] E Wolfson Med Ctr, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, IL-58100 Holon, Israel
关键词
Cervical preparation; Misoprostol; Laminaria; Surgical abortion; UTERINE PERFORATION; CURETTAGE ABORTION; ORAL MISOPROSTOL; 1ST TRIMESTER; TERMINATION; PREGNANCY; PREVENTION; EVACUATION; DILATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2015.01.018
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of vaginal misoprostol and laminaria for cervical preparation before second-trimester surgical abortion. Study design: We performed a prospective, randomized trial comparing midnight administration of misoprostol 600 mcg vaginally to midnight placement of laminaria, before surgical abortions among women at 13-20 weeks of gestation. The primary outcome was preoperative cervical dilation. Secondary outcomes were the need for further dilation, procedure duration and difficulty, immediate complications and side effects. Results: Eighty-four women were randomized, with a median gestational age of 16.5 weeks. The mean time interval between misoprostol and laminaria placement and dilatation and evacuation initiation was 11.0 +/- 2.9 and 11.2 +/- 2.0 h, respectively (p=.17). Cervical dilation was not greater in the laminaria group as compared to the misoprostol group (12.8 vs. 12.4 mm, respectively; p=.32). No difference was demonstrated regarding the need for additional dilation or the difficulty of the procedure. Procedures performed after laminaria insertion were 1 min longer (median 11 vs. 10 min, p=.04). Participants found laminaria placement more uncomfortable than vaginal misoprostol placement. Other than pain, additional side effects occurred only in the misoprostol group, primarily nausea and vomiting. One participant in the misoprostol group experienced fetal expulsion during the night before the intended procedure. Conclusion: Either vaginal misoprostol or laminaria provides adequate dilation for second-trimester surgical abortion. Laminaria causes more pain at insertion and misoprostol causes more side effects. Implications statement: We found that cervical preparation in an inpatient setting for approximately 11 h with misoprostol 600 mcg vaginally is comparable to 11 h of laminaria. However, given the potential for spontaneous expulsion and more side effects with misoprostol, laminaria is likely a better general option in such a setting. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:406 / 411
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cervical preparation prior to second-trimester surgical abortion and risk of subsequent preterm birth
    Lyus, Richard
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PLANNING AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2017, 43 (01): : 70 - 71
  • [42] Vaginal misoprostol versus intravenous oxytocin for the management of second-trimester pregnancies with intrauterine fetal death: A randomized clinical trial
    Abediasl, Zhila
    Sheikh, Mahdi
    Pooransari, Parichehr
    Farahani, Zahra
    Kalani, Farah
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2016, 42 (03) : 246 - 251
  • [43] Vaginal versus intrauterine extra-amniotic administration of misoprostol for second-trimester pregnancy termination; a randomized clinical trial
    Monfared, Niloufar Beheshti
    Raoofi, Zahra
    Soleimani, Reza
    Mohammadi, Sassan
    Hosseini, Shima
    Ghaderi, Hamid
    Monfared, Mahmoud Beheshti
    IMMUNOPATHOLOGIA PERSA, 2022, 8 (02):
  • [44] Vaginal misoprostol and intravenous oxytocin for success of termination in the second-trimester intrauterine fetal demise: A randomized controlled clinical trial
    Asadi, Nasrin
    Vafaei, Homeira
    Hessami, Kamaran
    Darabi, Mohammad Hasan
    Kasraeian, Maryam
    Faraji, Azam
    Alavi, Azin
    Abdi, Nazanin
    Gissuei, Atena
    Roozmeh, Shohre
    Bazrafshan, Khadije
    Gharibpour, Fereshteh
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2022, 48 (04) : 966 - 972
  • [45] Cervical preparation before second-trimester dilation and evacuation: a multicenter randomized trial comparing osmotic dilators alone to dilators plus adjunctive misoprostol or mifepristone
    Goldberg, A.
    Fitzmaurice, G.
    Fortin, J.
    McKetta, S.
    Dean, G.
    Drey, E.
    Lichtenberg, E. S.
    Bednarek, P.
    Chen, B.
    Dutton, C.
    Maurer, R.
    Winikoff, B.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2014, 90 (03) : 292 - 292
  • [46] Uterine Artery Embolization of Cervical Varices Before Second-Trimester Abortion
    Lesko, Jennifer
    Carusi, Daniela
    Shipp, Thomas D.
    Dutton, Caryn
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 123 (02): : 458 - 462
  • [47] Mifepristone in second-trimester medical abortion - A randomized controlled trial
    Kapp, Nathalie
    Borgatta, Lynn
    Stubblefield, Phillip
    Vragovic, Olivera
    Moreno, Nilda
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 110 (06): : 1304 - 1310
  • [48] Laminaria tent versus Misoprostol for cervical ripening before surgical process in missed abortion
    Raziah Dehghani Firouzabadi
    Leila Sekhavat
    Afsar Tabatabaii
    Sedighah Hamadani
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2012, 285 : 699 - 703
  • [49] Laminaria tent versus Misoprostol for cervical ripening before surgical process in missed abortion
    Firouzabadi, Raziah Dehghani
    Sekhavat, Leila
    Tabatabaii, Afsar
    Hamadani, Sedighah
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2012, 285 (03) : 699 - 703
  • [50] Comparison of Effectiveness of Laminaria versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Preparation Before Operative Hysteroscopy in Women of Reproductive Age: A Prospective Randomized Trial
    Karakus, Savas
    Akkar, Ozlem Bozoklu
    Yildiz, Caglar
    Yenicesu, Gonca Imir
    Cetin, Meral
    Cetin, Ali
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 23 (01) : 46 - 52