Laminaria vs. vaginal misoprostol for cervical preparation before A second-trimester surgical abortion: a randomized clinical trial

被引:6
|
作者
Sagiv, Ron [1 ]
Mizrachi, Yossi
Glickman, Hagit
Kerner, Ram
Keidar, Ran
Bar, Jacob
Golan, Abraham
机构
[1] E Wolfson Med Ctr, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, IL-58100 Holon, Israel
关键词
Cervical preparation; Misoprostol; Laminaria; Surgical abortion; UTERINE PERFORATION; CURETTAGE ABORTION; ORAL MISOPROSTOL; 1ST TRIMESTER; TERMINATION; PREGNANCY; PREVENTION; EVACUATION; DILATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2015.01.018
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of vaginal misoprostol and laminaria for cervical preparation before second-trimester surgical abortion. Study design: We performed a prospective, randomized trial comparing midnight administration of misoprostol 600 mcg vaginally to midnight placement of laminaria, before surgical abortions among women at 13-20 weeks of gestation. The primary outcome was preoperative cervical dilation. Secondary outcomes were the need for further dilation, procedure duration and difficulty, immediate complications and side effects. Results: Eighty-four women were randomized, with a median gestational age of 16.5 weeks. The mean time interval between misoprostol and laminaria placement and dilatation and evacuation initiation was 11.0 +/- 2.9 and 11.2 +/- 2.0 h, respectively (p=.17). Cervical dilation was not greater in the laminaria group as compared to the misoprostol group (12.8 vs. 12.4 mm, respectively; p=.32). No difference was demonstrated regarding the need for additional dilation or the difficulty of the procedure. Procedures performed after laminaria insertion were 1 min longer (median 11 vs. 10 min, p=.04). Participants found laminaria placement more uncomfortable than vaginal misoprostol placement. Other than pain, additional side effects occurred only in the misoprostol group, primarily nausea and vomiting. One participant in the misoprostol group experienced fetal expulsion during the night before the intended procedure. Conclusion: Either vaginal misoprostol or laminaria provides adequate dilation for second-trimester surgical abortion. Laminaria causes more pain at insertion and misoprostol causes more side effects. Implications statement: We found that cervical preparation in an inpatient setting for approximately 11 h with misoprostol 600 mcg vaginally is comparable to 11 h of laminaria. However, given the potential for spontaneous expulsion and more side effects with misoprostol, laminaria is likely a better general option in such a setting. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:406 / 411
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Misoprostol compared with laminaria before early second-trimester surgical abortion: A randomized trial
    Goldberg, AB
    Drey, EA
    Witaker, AK
    Kang, MS
    Meckstroth, KR
    Darney, PD
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 106 (02): : 234 - 241
  • [2] Vaginal vs. sublingual misoprostol with mifepristone for cervical priming in second-trimester abortion by dilation and evacuation: a randomized clinical trial
    Carbonell, Josep Lluis
    Gallego, Francisca Garcia
    Llorente, Margardell Perez
    Bermudez, Santiago Barambio
    Sala, Eugenia Sanchez
    Gonzalez, Lidia Varela
    Texido, Carlos Sanchez
    CONTRACEPTION, 2007, 75 (03) : 230 - 237
  • [3] A randomized clinical trial of the addition of laminaria to misoprostol and hypertonic saline for second-trimester induction abortion
    Borgatta, L
    Chen, AY
    Vragovic, O
    Stubblefield, PG
    Magloire, CA
    CONTRACEPTION, 2005, 72 (05) : 358 - 361
  • [4] Foley catheter and misoprostol for cervical preparation for second-trimester surgical abortion
    Chandrasekaran, Sruthi
    Paul, Maureen
    Ruggiero, Samantha
    Monschauer, Emily
    Blanchard, Kelly
    Robinson, Yashica
    CONTRACEPTION, 2021, 104 (04) : 437 - 441
  • [5] A Randomized Trial of Laminaria Tents Versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening in First Trimester Surgical Abortion
    Burnett, Margaret A.
    Corbett, Caroline A.
    Gertenstein, Robyn J.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2005, 27 (01) : 38 - 42
  • [6] RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL OF LIDOCAINE VS. BUPIVACAINE FOR PARACERVICAL BLOCK DURING LAMINARIA PLACEMENT IN SECOND-TRIMESTER ABORTION
    Davison, J.
    Murthy, A.
    Webb, A.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2012, 86 (02) : 176 - 177
  • [7] Efficacy of Vaginal Misoprostol in Second-trimester Abortion
    Bharti, Atima
    Kumari, Seema
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC STUDY, 2016, 3 (12) : 130 - 135
  • [8] Mifepristone and Oral, Vaginal, or Sublingual Misoprostol for Second-Trimester Abortion A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Dickinson, Jan E.
    Jennings, Belinda G.
    Doherty, Dorota A.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 123 (06): : 1162 - 1168
  • [9] Paracervical Block for Laminaria Insertion Before Second-Trimester Abortion A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Soon, Reni
    Tschann, Mary
    Salcedo, Jennifer
    Stevens, Katelyn
    Ahn, Hyeong Jun
    Kaneshiro, Bliss
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 130 (02): : 387 - 392
  • [10] A randomized controlled trial of laminaria, oral misoprostol, and vaginal misoprostol before abortion
    Sperling, AL
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 94 (04): : 637 - 637