Graft survival following living-donor renal transplantation: A comparison of tacrolimus and cyclosporine microemulsion with mycophenolate mofetil and steroids

被引:36
|
作者
Bunnapradist, S
Daswani, A
Takemoto, SK
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Immunogenet Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dumont Transplant Program, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Multiorgan Transplant Program, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.TP.0000079965.62765.1A
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Registry databases offer the statistical power to analyze differences in graft survival rates that may not be detected in randomized clinical trials. This study analyses 2-year graft survival using tacrolimus (tac) or cyclosporine (CsA) with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids. Methods. Data reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing Renal Transplant Registry for living-donor kidney patients receiving a transplant during 1998 to 1999 were included. The primary end point was graft survival after adjustment for confounding variables. A Cox model multivariate analysis was used to adjust for potential confounding factors. Results. Patients receiving CsA-MMF (n=4,686) and tac-MMF (n=2,393) were included. Unadjusted all-cause 2-year graft survival rate was significantly higher with CsA-MMF than tac-MMF (94.3% vs. 92.2%, P=0.0006). After adjustment for potential confounding factors, risk of graft failure at 2 years was significantly higher in patients receiving tac-MMF versus CsA-MMF for both all-cause graft failure (hazards ratio [HR] 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-1.49, P=0.002) and death-censored graft failure (HR 1.25,95% Cl 1.05-1.499 P=0.013). Other independent risk factors for graft failure were recipient or donor age greater than 55 years, female sex, pretransplant blood transfusions, one or two haplotype mismatches compared with zero haplotype mismatch, and panel reactive antibody (PRA) greater than 30%. Conclusions. Our findings demonstrate that 2-year renal allograft survival is significantly higher in living-donor recipients receiving CsA compared with tac as initial immunosuppression in combination with MMF.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 15
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A prospective randomized study comparing cyclosporine versus tacrolimus combined with daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids in heart transplantation
    Sanchez-Lazaro, Ignacio J.
    Almenar, Luis
    Martinez-Dolz, Luis
    Buendia-Fuentes, Francisco
    Agueero, Jaime
    Navarro-Manchon, Josep
    Vicente, Jose-Luis
    Salvador, Antoinio
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 25 (04) : 606 - 613
  • [22] TACROLIMUS VS CYCLOSPORINE MICROEMULSION: IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE REGIMEN MAKES A DIFFERENCE IN LIVING RENAL TRANSPLANTATION
    Woodward, Robert S.
    Kutinova, A.
    Brennan, D. C.
    NEPHROLOGY, 2005, 10 : A326 - A326
  • [23] Improved survival after lung transplantation in patients treated with tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil as compared with cyclosporine/azathioprine
    Izbicki, G
    Shitrit, D
    Aravot, D
    Sulkes, J
    Saute, M
    Sahar, G
    Kramer, MR
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 34 (08) : 3258 - 3259
  • [24] Early Outcomes of Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation With Immunosuppression Therapy Induction With Tacrolimus Extended-Release: A Comparison With Cyclosporine
    Konno, O.
    Yokoyama, T.
    Kihara, Y.
    Nakamura, Y.
    Ueno, T.
    Takeuchi, H.
    Iwamoto, H.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2018, 50 (08) : 2457 - 2460
  • [25] Mycophenolate mofetil improves long-term graft survival following renal transplantation in patients experiencing delayed graft function
    Cho, S
    Hodge, E
    Navarro, M
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1999, 31 (1-2) : 322 - 323
  • [26] Comparison of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium with mycophenolate mofetil in living renal allograft transplantation
    Minz, M.
    Sharma, A.
    Heer, M.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 38 (07) : 2041 - 2043
  • [27] Mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine, and steroids after renal transplantation:: Five-year results at a single center
    Herrero, JC
    Morales, E
    Dominguez-Gil, B
    Carreño, A
    Cubas, A
    Andres, A
    Praga, M
    Ortuño, T
    Hernandez, E
    Rodicio, JL
    Morales, JM
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1999, 31 (06) : 2263 - 2264
  • [28] RISK-FACTORS AFFECTING THE GRAFT-SURVIVAL RATE IN LIVING-DONOR RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION
    PARK, KI
    KIM, YS
    CHUNG, KY
    LEE, HY
    HAN, DS
    LEE, JS
    KIM, PK
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1989, 36 (06) : 1190 - 1190
  • [29] Comparison of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of mycophenolate mofetil in maintenance renal allograft recipients treated with tacrolimus or cyclosporine.
    Glander, Petra
    Hambach, Pia
    Bauer, Steffen
    Mai, Ingrid
    Neumayer, Hans H.
    Budde, Klemens
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 7 : 338 - 338
  • [30] Long-term Graft and Patient Survival With Mycophenolate Mofetil Therapy in Renal Transplantation
    Kocak, Huseyin
    Tuncer, Murat
    TURKISH NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS AND TRANSPLANTATION JOURNAL, 2008, 17 : 22 - 24