Awareness and use of direct-to-consumer nutrigenomic tests, United States, 2006

被引:44
|
作者
Goddard, Katrina A. B.
Moore, Cynthia
Ottman, Denae
Szegda, Kathleen L.
Bradley, Linda
Khoury, Muin J.
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Natl Off Publ Hlth Genom, Atlanta, GA 30341 USA
[2] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
HealthStyles survey; DocStyles survey; at-home; genetic tests; nutrigenomic;
D O I
10.1097/GIM.0b013e31812e6ac3
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Purpose: Direct-to-consumer genetic tests are increasingly available and may improve confidentiality, convenience, and accessibility. Amid ethical concerns and an uncertain regulatory landscape, the future of this mode of delivery is unclear. One class of products, nutrigenomic tests, is used to analyze DNA and lifestyle habits to assess health risks. Little information is available regarding awareness or use of such tests among consumers or physicians. Methods: We assessed consumers' awareness and use of nutrigenomic tests in the 2006 HealthStyles national survey (5250 respondents) and awareness among physicians in the 2006 DocStyles national survey (1250 respondents). Results: In the HealthStyles survey, 14% of respondents were aware of nutrigenomic tests, and 0.6% overall had used these tests. Respondents who were aware of nutrigenomic tests tended to be young and educated with a high income. Many physicians (44%) were aware of nutrigenomic tests, although 41% of these physicians had never had a patient ask about such tests, and most (74%) had never discussed the results of a nutrigenomic test with a patient. Conclusions: These results provide insight into current trends in public demand and interest in nutrigenomic tests and will aid in assessing the impact of policies, efforts at public or provider education, and the evolution of the availability and demand for such tests.
引用
收藏
页码:510 / 517
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Response to 'Europe and direct-to-consumer genetic tests'
    Larry J. Kricka
    Paolo Fortina
    Yuan Mai
    George P. Patrinos
    Nature Reviews Genetics, 2012, 13 : 146 - 146
  • [32] Increasing Public Awareness of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests: Health Care Access, Internet Use, and Population Density Correlates
    Rutten, Lila J. Finney
    Gollust, Sarah E.
    Naveed, Sana
    Moser, Richard P.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 2012
  • [33] Direct-to-consumer genetic tests: flawed and unethical
    不详
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2008, 9 (12): : 1113 - 1113
  • [34] The future of direct-to-consumer clinical genetic tests
    Felix W. Frueh
    Henry T. Greely
    Robert C. Green
    Stuart Hogarth
    Sue Siegel
    Nature Reviews Genetics, 2011, 12 : 511 - 515
  • [35] Direct-to-Consumer Marketing of Genetic and Genomic Tests
    不详
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2010, 37 (04) : 385 - 385
  • [36] The future of direct-to-consumer clinical genetic tests
    Frueh, Felix W.
    Greely, Henry T.
    Green, Robert C.
    Hogarth, Stuart
    Siegel, Sue
    NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2011, 12 (07) : 511 - 515
  • [37] The epistemic harms of direct-to-consumer genetic tests
    Yasmin Haddad
    Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 2023, 26 : 559 - 571
  • [38] Direct-to-consumer genetic tests: beyond medical regulation?
    Magnus, David
    Cho, Mildred K.
    Cook-Deegan, Robert
    GENOME MEDICINE, 2009, 1
  • [39] Are doctors prepared for direct-to-consumer advertising of genetics tests?
    Tracy, Erin E.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 110 (06): : 1389 - 1391
  • [40] Direct-to-consumer genetic tests: a risk to public health?
    Katsanis, S. H.
    Javitt, G.
    Hudson, K.
    PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2008, 5 (04) : 322 - 322