Evidence-based interventions and nurse-sensitive outcomes in district nursing care: A systematic review

被引:8
|
作者
Veldhuizen, J. D. [1 ,5 ]
Hafsteinsdottir, T. B. [1 ,2 ]
Mikkers, M. C. [3 ,4 ]
Bleijenberg, N. [1 ,2 ]
Schuurmans, M. J. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Appl Sci Utrecht, Fac Hlth Care, Res Ctr Hlth & Sustainable Living, NL-3584 CS Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Div Julius, Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Dept Gen Practice, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Dutch Healthcare Author NZa, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Tilburg Sch Econ & Management, Dept Econ, Tilburg, Netherlands
[5] Postbus 1201, NL-3501 AA Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Community health nursing; District nursing; Evidence-based nursing; Health care outcome assessment; Systematic review; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; PREVENTIVE HOME VISITS; OLDER-PEOPLE; HEALTH-PROMOTION; PROGRAM; MANAGEMENT; RISK; MOBILITY; QUALITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnsa.2021.100053
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Measuring nursing interventions and nurse-sensitive outcomes in a standardized manner is essential because it provides insight into the quality of delivered care. However, there is currently no systematic overview of the interventions conducted by district nurses, the evidence for the effects of these interventions, or what nurse-sensitive outcomes should be measured. Objective: 1) To provide an overview of interventions for community-living older people evaluated in district nursing care and evidence for the effects of these interventions and 2) to identify the nurse-sensitive outcomes that are used to evaluate these district nursing care interventions, how these outcomes are measured, and in which patient groups they are applied. Design: A systematic review of the literature. Setting: District nursing care. Data sources: MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and EMBASE. Methods: Only experimental studies evaluating district nursing care interventions for communkity-living older people were included. A data extraction form was developed to extract the study characteristics and evaluate interventions and nurse-sensitive outcomes. The methodological quality of the included studies was reviewed using the 13-item critical appraisal tool for randomized controlled trials by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Results: A total of 22 studies were included. The methodological quality of the studies varied, with scores ranging from 6 to 11 on a scale of 0-13. The 22 interventions identified were heterogeneous with respect to intervention components, intervention delivery, and target population. The 44 outcomes identified were grouped into categories following the Nursing Outcome Classification and were measured in various ways and at various times. Conclusion: This is the first systematic review summarizing the evidence for the effectiveness of nurse-led interventions conducted by district nurses on community-living older people. It is unclear what interventions are effective and what outcomes should be used to substantiate district nursing care effectiveness. Because only studies with experimental designs were included, this analysis may provide an incomplete assessment of the effectiveness of interventions in district nursing care. Therefore, it is highly necessary to produce methodologically strong evidence through research programs focusing on district nursing care.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An Integrative Review of Interventions for Enhancing Leadership in the Implementation of Evidence-Based Nursing
    Valimaki, Tarja
    Partanen, Pirjo
    Haggman-Laitila, Arja
    WORLDVIEWS ON EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING, 2018, 15 (06) : 424 - 431
  • [43] Evidence-Based Disparities in Stroke Care Metrics and Outcomes in the United States: A Systematic Review
    Ikeme, Shelly
    Kottenmeier, Emilie
    Uzochukwu, Goldfield
    Brinjikji, Waleed
    STROKE, 2022, 53 (03) : 670 - 679
  • [44] An outcomes approach to stroke care: the importance of teamwork and evidence-based nursing care
    Middleton, Sandy
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2012, 7 (03) : 224 - 226
  • [45] Systematic Review of Evidence-Based Guidelines for Prehospital Care
    Turner, Seth
    Lang, Eddy S.
    Brown, Kathleen
    Franke, Jantzen
    Workun-Hill, Michelle
    Jackson, Colleen
    Roberts, Lauren
    Leyton, Christopher
    Bulger, Eileen M.
    Censullo, Eileen M.
    Martin-Gill, Christian
    PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE, 2021, 25 (02) : 221 - 234
  • [46] NURSE RESIDENCY PROGRAMS: AN EVIDENCE-BASED REVIEW OF THEORY, PROCESS, AND OUTCOMES
    Anderson, Gwen
    Hair, Carole
    Todero, Catherine
    JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL NURSING, 2012, 28 (04) : 203 - 212
  • [47] Evidence-based nursing interventions in ankle fracture
    Ying, Li
    Dan, Bai
    Jun, Meng
    Feng, Guo
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2025, 48 (02) : 1316 - 1317
  • [48] Interventions for compassionate nursing care: A systematic review
    Blomberg, Karin
    Griffiths, Peter
    Wengstrom, Yvonne
    May, Carl
    Bridges, Jackie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2016, 62 : 137 - 155
  • [49] Ambulatory Care Nurse-Sensitive Indicators: A Scoping Review of the Literature 2006-2021
    Siaki, Leilani A.
    Patrician, Patricia A.
    Loan, Lori A.
    Matlock, Ann Marie
    Start, Rachel E.
    Gardner, Cubby L.
    McCarthy, Mary S.
    JOURNAL OF NURSING CARE QUALITY, 2023, 38 (01) : 76 - 81
  • [50] Rationing of nursing care and nurse-patient outcomes: a systematic review of quantitative studies
    Papastavrou, Evridiki
    Andreou, Panayiota
    Efstathiou, Georgios
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 29 (01): : 3 - 25