Analysis of three optimization techniques in a treatment planning system

被引:0
|
作者
Hu, Z [1 ]
Chu, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1118/1.1997692
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To develop the biological and dosimetric based tools for the evaluation of the treatment plans. Method and Materials: We have developed a set of treatment planning evaluation tools based on the equivalent uniform dose(EUD), Coverage Index(CI), Homogeneity Index(HI) and Overdose Index(OI) to evaluate the HDR brachytherapy treatment plans. Three different optimization techniques in PLATO treatment planning system are used for CT based 3D conformal brachytherapy: geometric optimization(GO), inverse optimization(IO), and the optimization to the dose points on the surface of the tumor volume(SO). All reference doses are prescribed to the points on the PTV surfaces. Treatment plans of 10 patients are analyzed. Results: The GO techniques has the best dose uniformity(mean HI=0.60) but poorest target volume coverage(mean CI=0.71). The SO method provides the best coverage(mean CI=0.85) and lowest homogeneity(mean HI=0.62). The IO plans show a compromise between coverage and dose homogeneity(mean CI=0.52 and HI=0.43). CI and EUD show close correlation for plans produced by all three optimization techniques. Conclusion: Our study suggests that these dosimetric indices could be useful tools in the evaluation of the CT based 3D conformal brachytherapy planning. © 2005, American Association of Physicists in Medicine. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1954 / 1954
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Three-dimensional optimization of treatment planning for gamma unit treatment system
    Shu, HZ
    Yan, YL
    Luo, LM
    Bao, XD
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (12) : 2352 - 2357
  • [2] TREATMENT PLANNING: IMRT OPTIMIZATION - BASIC AND ADVANCED TECHNIQUES
    Nill, Simeon
    RADIOTHERAPY AND BRACHYTHERAPY, 2009, : 95 - +
  • [3] Dosimetric Comparison of Three Arc Techniques in Prostate Treatment Planning
    Jiang, L.
    Rule, W.
    Solberg, T.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06)
  • [4] Comparison of Three Treatment Planning Techniques for Adjuvant Radiation of the Bladder
    Kassaee, A.
    Dimofte, A.
    Dolney, D.
    Tucker, K.
    Baumann, B.
    Christodouleas, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (06)
  • [5] Dose optimization for the treatment of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: A comparison of treatment planning techniques
    Posner, MD
    Quivey, JM
    Akazawa, PF
    Xia, P
    Akazawa, C
    Verhey, LJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 48 (02): : 475 - 483
  • [6] Evaluation of treatment planning system monitor unit calculations for three intensity modulated radiotherapy delivery techniques
    Anjum, M. N.
    Parker, W.
    Aldahlawi, I.
    Ruo, R.
    Afzal, M.
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2011, 9 (03): : 145 - 150
  • [7] An Evaluation of Three Robust Optimization Approaches in IMPT Treatment Planning
    Cao, W.
    Zaqhian, M.
    Liu, W.
    Kardar, L.
    Randeniya, S.
    Urn, G.
    Mohan, R.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 552 - 552
  • [8] Optimization techniques for hyperthermia treatment planning of breast cancer: A comparative study
    Baskaran, Divya
    Arunachalam, Kavitha
    2019 IEEE MTT-S INTERNATIONAL MICROWAVE AND RF CONFERENCE (IMARC), 2019,
  • [9] Mixed integer programming techniques applied to IMRT treatment planning optimization
    Lee, E
    Fox, T
    Crocker, I
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (06) : 1259 - 1259
  • [10] Radiotherapy for the treatment of pituitary adenomas: A dosimetric comparison of three planning techniques
    Ramos-Prudencio, Rubi
    Ileana Perez-Alvarez, Sandra
    Haydee Flores-Balcazar, Christian
    Angelica de Leon-Alfaro, Mayra
    Alfredo Herrera-Gonzalez, Jose
    Elizalde-Cabrera, Jonathan
    Rubalcava-Ortega, Johnatan
    Espinoza-Alvarado, Lissett
    Ivan Balderrama-Ibarra, Ricardo
    REPORTS OF PRACTICAL ONCOLOGY AND RADIOTHERAPY, 2020, 25 (04) : 586 - 593