An Alternative Rangeland Management Strategy in an Agro-Pastoral Area in Western China

被引:7
|
作者
Hua, Limin [1 ]
Yang, Siwei [1 ,2 ]
Squires, Victor
Wang, Guizhen [1 ]
机构
[1] Gansu Agr Univ, Sino US Ctr Grazing Land Ecosyst Sustainabil, Rangeland Sci Dept, Key Lab Grassland Ecosyst,Minist Educ, Lanzhou 730070, Peoples R China
[2] Inst Anim & Vet Sci, Bijie 551700, Peoples R China
关键词
agro-pastoral region; community participation; family income; livestock; rangeland governance; vegetation; GRASSLAND; RESOURCE; DEGRADATION; ENCLOSURES; IMPACTS; RIGHTS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.rama.2015.01.001
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Governance plays a key role in rangeland management. In China, all rangeland, including pastoral land and agro-pastoral land, is owned by the State. Since 1980, use rights have been granted to households by the Chinese government extending the household contract responsibility system (HCRS). But in the agro-pastoral areas of northwestern (NW) China, the rangeland degradation is more severe than that in pastoral areas. The HCRS is difficult to implement because the limited and fragmented grazing land cannot be contracted to individual households. Thus the pastures in the agro-pastoral areas are grazed as communal pastoral land and the rate of rangeland degradation has accelerated as livestock numbers have grown. Several measures have been introduced in an attempt to reverse this degradation trend, but most failed. This paper reports a 5-year comparison of three rangeland management regimens, including the national "Protecting rangeland by restricting grazing" (PRRG) project under the individual HCRS (PRRG under IHCRS), the Allied Householders Contract Responsibility System (AHCRS) program funded by the World Bank/GEF, and the free grazing on common pasture as the control area (CA) at Mayinggou Village, Yongchang County, Gansu Province in NW China. The results showed significant differences (P < 0.05) between AHCRS and the other two regimens (PRRG under IHCRS and CA) in terms of biomass of palatable forages, cover, and plant diversity index of vegetation but no significant difference (P > 0.05) between PRRG under IHCRS and CA. Reducing the number of livestock in AHCRS also resulted in increased revenue from the livestock turn-off rate compared with that in PRRG under IHCRS and CA. Therefore, AHCRS is a better alternative management regimen for rangelands in agro-pastoral areas. AHCRS can solve the overgrazing problem, maintain or improve household income, and potentially ensure a long-term sustainable rangeland management regimen in agro-pastoral areas in NW China. (C) 2015 Society for Range Management. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 118
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Response of soil nutrients and erodibility to slope aspect in the northern agro-pastoral ecotone, China
    Wu, Yuxin
    Jia, Guodong
    Yu, Xinxiao
    Rao, Honghong
    Peng, Xiuwen
    Wang, Yusong
    Wang, Yushi
    Wang, Xu
    SOIL, 2024, 10 (01) : 61 - 75
  • [32] Land degradation of agro-pastoral zigzag zone in Northern China based on RS and GIS
    Lu, YX
    Wang, J
    Mao, ZQ
    IGARSS 2004: IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-7: SCIENCE FOR SOCIETY: EXPLORING AND MANAGING A CHANGING PLANET, 2004, : 2111 - 2114
  • [33] Application of Landsat ETM plus in Monitoring of Desertification in Agro-Pastoral Ecotone of Northern China
    Mi Jia
    Wang Kun
    Wang Hong-mei
    SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2011, 31 (03) : 798 - 802
  • [34] Environmental Change in the Agro-Pastoral Transitional Zone, Northern China: Patterns, Drivers, and Implications
    Jiang, Chong
    Wang, Fei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 13 (02):
  • [35] Exploring the characteristics and sources of carbonaceous aerosols in the agro-pastoral transitional zone of Northern China
    Hao, Yufang
    Meng, Xiangpeng
    Yu, Xuepu
    Lei, Mingli
    Li, Wenjun
    Yang, Wenwen
    Shi, Fangtian
    Xie, Shaodong
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2019, 249 : 589 - 597
  • [36] Changing Agro-Pastoral Livelihoods under Collective and Private Land Use in Xinjiang, China
    Li, Dan
    Hruska, Tracy
    Talinbayi, Shalima
    Li, Wenjun
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (01):
  • [37] Analysis of the Future Evolution of Biocapacity and Landscape Characteristics in the Agro-Pastoral Zone of Northern China
    Niu, Xiaoyu
    Hu, Yunfeng
    Zhen, Lin
    Wang, Yiming
    Yan, Huimin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (23)
  • [38] Herbaceous plant species diversity in communal agro-pastoral and conservation areas in western Serengeti, Tanzania
    Kavana, Pius Yoram
    Sangeda, Anthony Z.
    Mtengeti, Ephraim J.
    Mahonge, Christopher
    Bukombe, John
    Fyumagwa, Robert
    Nindi, Stephen
    TROPICAL GRASSLANDS-FORRAJES TROPICALES, 2019, 7 (05): : 502 - 518
  • [39] Wind tunnel study of multiple factors affecting wind erosion from cropland in agro-pastoral area of Inner Mongolia, China
    Ji-jun He
    Qiang-guo Cai
    Wen-qing Cao
    Journal of Mountain Science, 2013, 10 : 68 - 74
  • [40] Wind Tunnel Study of Multiple Factors Affecting Wind Erosion from Cropland in Agro-pastoral Area of Inner Mongolia,China
    HE Ji-jun
    CAI Qiang-guo
    CAO Wen-qing
    JournalofMountainScience, 2013, 10 (01) : 68 - 74