A prospective, multicenter trial of the VentrAssist left ventricular assist device for bridge to transplant: Safety and efficacy

被引:57
|
作者
Esmore, Donald [1 ]
Kaye, David [1 ]
Spratt, Phillip [2 ]
Larbalestier, Robert [3 ]
Ruygrok, Peter [4 ]
Tsui, Steven [5 ]
Meyers, Deborah [6 ]
Fiane, Arnt E. [7 ]
Woodard, John [8 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Alfred Hosp, Melbourne, Vic 3181, Australia
[2] St Vincents Hosp, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia
[3] Royal Perth Hosp, Perth, WA, Australia
[4] Auckland City Hosp, Auckland, New Zealand
[5] Papworth Hosp, Cambridge CB3 8RE, England
[6] Prince Charles Hosp, Brisbane, Qld 4032, Australia
[7] Rikshosp Univ Hosp, Oslo, Norway
[8] Ventracor Ltd, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.healun.2008.02.012
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The increasing prevalence of chronic heart failure has stimulated the ongoing development of left ventricular assist devices. (LVADs) for both bridge-to-transplant (13717) and destination therapy (DT). The aim of this prospective, Multicenter clinical trial was to determine the efficacy and safety of a third-generation LVAD, the VentrAssist, in a BTT cohort. Methods: Patients (n = 33) with end-stage chronic heart failure who required, circulatory support as BTT therapy were implanted with a VentrAssist device. The. primary outcome was survival until transplant or transplant eligibility with the device in situ at trial end-point (Day 154 after implant). The secondary outcomes were pump flow index and end-organ function. Safety, patient functional status and resource use were also assessed. Results: At trial end-point, the success rate was 82% (39.4% transplanted, 42.4% transplant-eligible). The LVAD pump flow index (median >= 2-7 liters/min/m(2)) was sufficient to maintain an adequate circulation and significantly improve end-organ function. Of the 77 protocol-defined serious adverse events, most occurred within 30 days of implantation. No patients died as a direct result of pump failure or malfunction. After implantation, patient functional status improved, with 70% of patients achieving hospital discharge, and resource use was reduced. Conclusions: This trial demonstrated a favorable efficacy and safety profile for use of the VentrAssist LVAD in BTT patients.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 588
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Left ventricular assist device as a bridge to partial left ventriculectomy
    Frazier, OH
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 1999, 15 : S20 - S25
  • [22] Safety and feasibility trial of the micromed DeBakey ventricular assist device as a bridge to transplantation
    Goldstein, DJ
    Zucker, M
    Arroyo, L
    Baran, D
    McCarthy, PM
    Loebe, M
    Noon, GP
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 45 (06) : 962 - 963
  • [23] Bridge to transplant with the Novacor left ventricular assist system
    Robbins, RC
    Oyer, PE
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1999, 68 (02): : 695 - 697
  • [24] Risk of left ventricular assist device as a bridge to heart transplant following postinfarction ventricular septal rupture
    Kshettry, VR
    Salerno, CT
    Bank, AJ
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 1997, 12 (02) : 93 - 97
  • [25] Chronic left ventricular assist device (LVAD) bridge to transplant with left ventricular outflow (LVOT) obstruction clinical results
    Dembitsky, W.P.
    Jaski, B.E.
    Adamson, R.M.
    Chillcott, S.R.
    Daily, P.O.
    ASAIO Journal, 2000, 46 (02)
  • [26] SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF PROPHYLACTIC AMIODARONE AFTER LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE IMPLANTATION
    Graboyes, Sydney
    Harris, Taylor
    Kline, Theresa
    Iyer, Prashanth
    Hollis, Ian
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 77 (18) : 763 - 763
  • [27] THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF PERIOPERATIVE FEIBA AFTER LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE IMPLANTATION
    ODonnell, Christian
    Rodriguez, Alexander
    Madhok, Jai
    Wang, Hanjay
    Shad, Rohan
    Sharifi, Husham
    Boyd, Jack
    William, Hiesinger
    Hsu, Joe
    Hill, Charles
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2021, 49 (01) : 168 - 168
  • [28] The Ventricular Assist Device: Bridge to Transplant. Bridge to Recovery? Bridge to Beyond?
    Bronicki, Ronald A.
    Adachi, Iki
    PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 14 (09) : 910 - 911
  • [29] Prospective Trial of a Pediatric Ventricular Assist Device
    Singh, Tajinder P.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 367 (22): : 2159 - 2159
  • [30] Prospective Trial of a Pediatric Ventricular Assist Device
    Fraser, Charles D., Jr.
    Jaquiss, Robert D. B.
    Rosenthal, David N.
    Humpl, Tilman
    Canter, Charles E.
    Blackstone, Eugene H.
    Naftel, David C.
    Ichord, Rebecca N.
    Bomgaars, Lisa
    Tweddell, James S.
    Massicotte, M. Patricia
    Turrentine, Mark W.
    Cohen, Gordon A.
    Devaney, Eric J.
    Pearce, F. Bennett
    Carberry, Kathleen E.
    Kroslowitz, Robert
    Almond, Christopher S.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 367 (06): : 532 - 541