Promoting Productive Political Dialogue in Online Discussion Forums

被引:4
|
作者
King, Aaron S. [1 ]
Taylor, J. Benjamin [2 ]
Webb, Brian M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Wilmington, NC USA
[2] Kennesaw State Univ, Polit Sci, Sch Govt & Int Affairs, Kennesaw, GA 30144 USA
[3] Gordon State Coll, Polit Sci, Barnesville, GA USA
关键词
Civic education; asynchronous discussions; online teaching; mixed-method research; PARTICIPATION; NEWS; PERFORMANCE; INCIVILITY; SENTIMENT; ENHANCE; SUCCESS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/15512169.2020.1808476
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Discussion is a crucial component for learning in a college classroom. Increasingly, university and college faculty are using online learning management systems to facilitate and assess course discussions. Given this reality, are there ways to frame prompts to generate normatively better discussions, or discussions where students are better able to meet the course learning outcomes? To answer these questions, we utilize data from Introduction to American Government classes at two institutions with the students of three instructors who participated in online discussion boards on multiple substantive topics; for each topic, students were randomly assigned to one of two experimental conditions. In each, we framed a related prompt in different ways to test how such prompts impact student success as measured by several learning outcomes informed by the American Association of Colleges & Universities (AAC&U). With our unique experimental design and novel data, we are able to test several hypotheses related to student engagement, the content of discussions, as well as the quality of students' work. In the end, our research has important normative implications for pedagogy as well as the cultivation of civility and political engagement inside and outside of the modern classroom environment.
引用
收藏
页码:724 / 750
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Using online discussion forums to support learning of paraphrasing
    Tan, Kok-Eng
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 48 (06) : 1239 - 1249
  • [32] NUI technical discussion forums: Meet us online
    NetWare Connection, 1996, 7 (02):
  • [33] GIRLS' PEER SEX COUNSELING IN ONLINE DISCUSSION FORUMS
    Doering, Nicola
    Prinzellner, Yvonne
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2015, 12 : 322 - 322
  • [34] When to jump in: The role of the instructor in online discussion forums
    Mazzolini, Margaret
    Maddison, Sarah
    COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2007, 49 (02) : 193 - 213
  • [35] An effective experts mining technique in Online discussion forums
    Akram, Abubakker Usman
    Iqbal, Khalid
    Faisal, Ch. Muhammad Shahzad
    Ishfaq, Umer
    2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING, ELECTRONIC AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING (ICE CUBE), 2016, : 95 - 99
  • [36] Democracy, deliberation and design: The case of online discussion forums
    Wright, Scott
    Street, John
    NEW MEDIA & SOCIETY, 2007, 9 (05) : 849 - 869
  • [37] Social Network Analysis in Student Online Discussion Forums
    Suraj, P.
    Roshni, Kumari V. S.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 IEEE RECENT ADVANCES IN INTELLIGENT COMPUTATIONAL SYSTEMS (RAICS), 2015, : 134 - 138
  • [38] Patient Perspectives of Dabigatran: Analysis of Online Discussion Forums
    Mary S. Vaughan Sarrazin
    Peter Cram
    Alexandur Mazur
    Melissa Ward
    Heather Schacht Reisinger
    The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2014, 7 : 47 - 54
  • [39] The use of online discussion forums and communities for health research
    Shaw, Eric K.
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2020, 37 (04) : 574 - 577
  • [40] Accuracy of online discussion forums on common childhood ailments
    Farrell, Alison
    JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, 2018, 106 (04) : 455 - 463