Prepectoral Conversion of Subpectoral Implants for Animation Deformity after Breast Reconstruction: Technique and Experience

被引:2
|
作者
Shikhman, Alexander [1 ]
Erz, Logan [2 ]
Brown, Meghan [1 ]
Wagner, Douglas [1 ]
机构
[1] Summa Hlth Syst, Div Plast Surg, Dept Surg, Akron, OH 44309 USA
[2] Summa Hlth Syst, Dept Surg, Akron, OH 44309 USA
关键词
PECTORALIS MAJOR MUSCLE; MASTECTOMY;
D O I
10.1097/GOX.0000000000004132
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Implant-based breast reconstruction in postmastectomy patients is commonly performed in a submuscular plane. Following reconstruction, animation deformity can be a displeasing aesthetic result for patients. In addition, patients may experience more postoperative pain with a submuscular reconstruction. Prepectoral conversion of submuscular implant position is an option for addressing these concerns. We describe a detailed technique and review our results. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of all prepectoral conversions performed by the senior author (DSW) from 2017 to 2019 after IRB approval. All patients presented with animation deformity and another symptom such as asymmetry, pain, and/or capsular contracture. Patients underwent prepectoral conversion with smooth silicone gel implants. Demographic data, outcomes, and patient satisfaction were reviewed. Results: Prepectoral conversion was performed in 33 consecutive patients (57 breasts) with animation deformity. Twelve patients had capsular contracture, seven complained of pain, and five had ruptured implants. Postoperative complications included three infections requiring implant removal in two breasts, one implant exposure and one hematoma requiring implant replacement, five seromas requiring aspiration, and one capsular contracture. Seven patients had contour abnormalities addressed with secondary autologous fat grafting. Ultimately, all patients had elimination of animation deformity and were satisfied with the results of the conversion. Conclusions: Unsatisfactory results of subpectoral implant reconstruction such as animation deformity and chronic pain have led the reconstructive surgeon to consider various techniques to address these issues. The conversion to a prepectoral plane will effectively eliminate animation deformity, resolve pain, and yield satisfactory results in these patients.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Revision Rates in Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Delayed-Immediate Autologous Breast Reconstruction
    Patel, Ashraf A.
    Cemaj, Sophie L.
    Martin, Shanique A.
    Cheesborough, Jennifer E.
    Lee, Gordon K.
    Nazerali, Rahim S.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2021, 86 (5S) : S409 - S413
  • [42] A Quantitative Analysis of Animation Deformity in Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction
    Kim, John Y. S.
    Qiu, Cecil S.
    Chiu, Wen-Kuan
    Feld, Lauren N.
    Mioton, Lauren M.
    Kearney, Aaron
    Fracol, Megan
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 144 (02) : 291 - 301
  • [43] Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction after Nipple-sparing Mastectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Nolan, Ian T.
    Farajzadeh, Matthew M.
    Bekisz, Jonathan M.
    Boyd, Carter J.
    Gibson, Ella G.
    Salibian, Ara A.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2024, 12 (05)
  • [44] A Comparison of BREAST-Q Scores between Prepectoral and Subpectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction
    Le, Nicole K.
    Persing, Sarah
    Dinis, Jacob
    Gabrick, Kyle S.
    Wu, Robin T.
    Sinnott, Catherine J.
    Avraham, Tomer
    Young, Anke Ott
    Alperovich, Michael
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 148 (05) : 708E - 714E
  • [45] A Comparative Study of Secondary Procedures after Subpectoral and Prepectoral Single-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Abbas, Abeera
    Rizki, Hirah
    Tanska, Aleksandra
    Concepcion, Mae
    Tasoulis, Marios Konstantinos
    Gui, Gerald
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2023, 151 (01) : 7 - 15
  • [46] Immediate Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Traditional Subpectoral Technique versus Direct-to-Implant Prepectoral Reconstruction without Acellular Dermal Matrix
    Franceschini, Gianluca
    Scardina, Lorenzo
    Di Leone, Alba
    Terribile, Daniela Andreina
    Sanchez, Alejandro Martin
    Magno, Stefano
    D'Archi, Sabatino
    Franco, Antonio
    Mason, Elena Jane
    Carnassale, Beatrice
    Murando, Federica
    Orlandi, Armando
    Barone Adesi, Liliana
    Visconti, Giuseppe
    Salgarello, Marzia
    Masetti, Riccardo
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2021, 11 (02): : 1 - 12
  • [47] Conversion to Prepectoral Breast Implant Reconstruction after Chest Wall Resection for Desmoid Tumor
    Bamba, Ravinder
    Kerwin, K. Blaire
    Mailey, Brian
    Ceppa, DuyKhanh P.
    Hassanein, Aladdin H.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2020, 8 (08)
  • [48] Comparison Between Prepectoral and Subpectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: a Case Series Analysis
    Ofek, Sar-el
    Gronovich, Yoav
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 84 (SUPPL 3) : 633 - 640
  • [49] Direct-to-Implant Extracellular Matrix Hammock-based Breast Reconstruction; Prepectoral or Subpectoral?
    Diana L. Dyrberg
    Gudjon L. Gunnarsson
    Camilla Bille
    Jens A. Sørensen
    Jørn B. Thomsen
    Trials, 21
  • [50] Surgical Outcomes of Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction in Young Women
    Manrique, Oscar J.
    Banuelos, Joseph
    Abu-Ghname, Amjed
    Minh-Doan Nguyen
    Tran, Nho, V
    Martinez-Jorge, Jorys
    Harless, Christin
    Sharaf, Basel
    Jakub, James W.
    Degnim, Amy C.
    Boughey, Judy C.
    Jacobson, Steven R.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2019, 7 (03)