A Patient-Centered Framework for Evaluating Digital Maturity of Health Services: A Systematic Review

被引:41
|
作者
Flott, Kelsey [1 ]
Callahan, Ryan [1 ]
Darzi, Ara [1 ]
Mayer, Erik [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Inst Global Hlth Innovat, Ctr Hlth Policy, St Marys Campus,Praed St, London W2 1NY, England
关键词
digital maturity; evaluation; health information exchange; patient-centered care; INFORMATION EXCHANGE; MCLEAN MODEL; INTEROPERABILITY; IMPLEMENTATION; SUCCESS; TECHNOLOGY; CHALLENGES; DELONE; USAGE;
D O I
10.2196/jmir.5047
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Digital maturity is the extent to which digital technologies are used as enablers to deliver a high-quality health service. Extensive literature exists about how to assess the components of digital maturity, but it has not been used to design a comprehensive framework for evaluation. Consequently, the measurement systems that do exist are limited to evaluating digital programs within one service or care setting, meaning that digital maturity evaluation is not accounting for the needs of patients across their care pathways. Objective: The objective of our study was to identify the best methods and metrics for evaluating digital maturity and to create a novel, evidence-based tool for evaluating digital maturity across patient care pathways. Methods: We systematically reviewed the literature to find the best methods and metrics for evaluating digital maturity. We searched the PubMed database for all papers relevant to digital maturity evaluation. Papers were selected if they provided insight into how to appraise digital systems within the health service and if they indicated the factors that constitute or facilitate digital maturity. Papers were analyzed to identify methodology for evaluating digital maturity and indicators of digitally mature systems. We then used the resulting information about methodology to design an evaluation framework. Following that, the indicators of digital maturity were extracted and grouped into increasing levels of maturity and operationalized as metrics within the evaluation framework. Results: We identified 28 papers as relevant to evaluating digital maturity, from which we derived 5 themes. The first theme concerned general evaluation methodology for constructing the framework (7 papers). The following 4 themes were the increasing levels of digital maturity: resources and ability (6 papers), usage (7 papers), interoperability (3 papers), and impact (5 papers). The framework includes metrics for each of these levels at each stage of the typical patient care pathway. Conclusions: The framework uses a patient-centric model that departs from traditional service-specific measurements and allows for novel insights into how digital programs benefit patients across the health system.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Limited English Proficiency and Perioperative Patient-Centered Outcomes: A Systematic Review
    Luan-Erfe, Betty M.
    Erfe, J. Mark
    DeCaria, Bruno
    Okocha, Obianuju
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2023, 136 (06): : 1096 - 1106
  • [42] A Systematic Review of Surveys for Measuring Patient-centered Care in the Hospital Setting
    Handley, Sara C.
    Bell, Sydney
    Nembhard, Ingrid M.
    MEDICAL CARE, 2021, 59 (03) : 228 - 237
  • [43] Telemedicine in lung transplant to improve patient-centered care: A systematic review
    Gholamzadeh, Marsa
    Abtahi, Hamidreza
    Safdari, Reza
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2022, 167
  • [44] Patient-centered interprofessional education in cancer care: a systematic scoping review
    Fragner, Tobias
    Hama, Honja
    Serifovic, Adis
    Kirchheiner, Kathrin
    Grabovac, Igor
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [45] Patient-Centered Men's Health
    Porche, Demetrius J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2014, 8 (01) : 5 - 5
  • [46] The effectiveness of cultural competence programs in ethnic minority patient-centered health careua systematic review of the literature
    Renzaho, A. M. N.
    Romios, P.
    Crock, C.
    Sonderlund, A. L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2013, 25 (03) : 261 - 269
  • [47] The patient-centered oncology care on health care utilization and cost: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liang, Hailun
    Tao, Lei
    Ford, Eric W.
    Beydoun, May A.
    Eid, Shaker M.
    HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2020, 45 (04) : 364 - 376
  • [48] Patient-centered care for mental health in patients with heart failure in the intensive care unit: A systematic review
    Yoo, Hye Jin
    Kim, Namhee
    Park, Min Kyung
    APPLIED NURSING RESEARCH, 2024, 78
  • [49] Patient-Centered E-Health
    Burkhard, Richard
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF E-HEALTH AND MEDICAL COMMUNICATIONS, 2010, 1 (01) : 64 - 66
  • [50] Patient-centered care and health outcomes
    Ward, MM
    CURRENT OPINION IN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2004, 16 (02) : 89 - 90