A Patient-Centered Framework for Evaluating Digital Maturity of Health Services: A Systematic Review

被引:41
|
作者
Flott, Kelsey [1 ]
Callahan, Ryan [1 ]
Darzi, Ara [1 ]
Mayer, Erik [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Inst Global Hlth Innovat, Ctr Hlth Policy, St Marys Campus,Praed St, London W2 1NY, England
关键词
digital maturity; evaluation; health information exchange; patient-centered care; INFORMATION EXCHANGE; MCLEAN MODEL; INTEROPERABILITY; IMPLEMENTATION; SUCCESS; TECHNOLOGY; CHALLENGES; DELONE; USAGE;
D O I
10.2196/jmir.5047
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Digital maturity is the extent to which digital technologies are used as enablers to deliver a high-quality health service. Extensive literature exists about how to assess the components of digital maturity, but it has not been used to design a comprehensive framework for evaluation. Consequently, the measurement systems that do exist are limited to evaluating digital programs within one service or care setting, meaning that digital maturity evaluation is not accounting for the needs of patients across their care pathways. Objective: The objective of our study was to identify the best methods and metrics for evaluating digital maturity and to create a novel, evidence-based tool for evaluating digital maturity across patient care pathways. Methods: We systematically reviewed the literature to find the best methods and metrics for evaluating digital maturity. We searched the PubMed database for all papers relevant to digital maturity evaluation. Papers were selected if they provided insight into how to appraise digital systems within the health service and if they indicated the factors that constitute or facilitate digital maturity. Papers were analyzed to identify methodology for evaluating digital maturity and indicators of digitally mature systems. We then used the resulting information about methodology to design an evaluation framework. Following that, the indicators of digital maturity were extracted and grouped into increasing levels of maturity and operationalized as metrics within the evaluation framework. Results: We identified 28 papers as relevant to evaluating digital maturity, from which we derived 5 themes. The first theme concerned general evaluation methodology for constructing the framework (7 papers). The following 4 themes were the increasing levels of digital maturity: resources and ability (6 papers), usage (7 papers), interoperability (3 papers), and impact (5 papers). The framework includes metrics for each of these levels at each stage of the typical patient care pathway. Conclusions: The framework uses a patient-centric model that departs from traditional service-specific measurements and allows for novel insights into how digital programs benefit patients across the health system.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient-Centered Digital Health Records and Their Effects on Health Outcomes: Systematic Review
    Brands, Martijn R.
    Gouw, Samantha C.
    Beestrum, Molly
    Cronin, Robert M.
    Fijnvandraat, Karin
    Badawy, Sherif M.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (12)
  • [2] THE PATIENT-CENTERED MEDICAL HOME, A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Chatterjee, Ranee
    Jackson, George
    Bettger, Janet
    Powers, Benjamin
    Kemper, Alex
    Dolor, Rowena
    Williams, John
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 27 : S325 - S326
  • [3] Patient-Centered Medical Home A Systematic Review
    Jackson, George L.
    Powers, Benjamin J.
    Chatterjee, Ranee
    Bettger, Janet Prvu
    Kemper, Alex R.
    Hasselblad, Vic
    Dolor, Rowena J.
    Irvine, Julian
    Heidenfelder, Brooke L.
    Kendrick, Amy S.
    Gray, Rebecca
    Williams, John W., Jr.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 158 (03) : 169 - +
  • [4] Patient-Centered Approaches to Health Care: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
    McMillan, Sara S.
    Kendall, Elizabeth
    Sav, Adem
    King, Michelle A.
    Whitty, Jennifer A.
    Kelly, Fiona
    Wheeler, Amanda J.
    MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 2013, 70 (06) : 567 - 596
  • [5] Patient-Centered Health Care Delivery Systems: A Framework
    Muehlbacher, Axel C.
    Bethge, Susanne
    Schulman, Kevin A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2013, 13
  • [6] Patient-Centered Care and Outcomes: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Rathert, Cheryl
    Wyrwich, Mary D.
    Boren, Suzanne Austin
    MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 2013, 70 (04) : 351 - 379
  • [7] Patient-centered education in dyslipidemia management: a systematic review
    Ismail, Farhana Fakhira
    Redzuan, Adyani Md
    Wen, Chong Wei
    ASIAN BIOMEDICINE, 2022, 16 (05) : 214 - 236
  • [8] Impact of Patient-Centered Discharge Tools: A Systematic Review
    Okrainec, Karen
    Lau, Davina
    Abrams, Howard B.
    Hahn-Goldberg, Shoshanna
    Brahmbhatt, Ronak
    Huynh, Tai
    Lam, Kenneth
    Bell, Chaim M.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2017, 12 (02) : 110 - 117
  • [9] Expanding Pharmacy Capacity for Patient-Centered Reproductive Health Services
    Pfaff, Anna
    Rafie, Sally
    PHARMACY, 2020, 8 (04)
  • [10] Patient-Centered Methods for Designing and Developing Health Information Communication Technologies: A Systematic Review
    Mitchell, Katharine M.
    Holtz, Bree E.
    McCarroll, Alexis
    TELEMEDICINE AND E-HEALTH, 2019, 25 (11) : 1012 - 1021