Posterior cervical fixation following laminectomy: a stress analysis of three techniques

被引:24
|
作者
Duan, Yang [1 ]
Zhang, Hui [1 ]
Min, Shao-xiong [1 ]
Zhang, Li [1 ]
Jin, An-min [1 ]
机构
[1] So Med Univ, Dept Orthopaed, Zhu Jiang Hosp, Guangzhou 510282, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Laminectomy; Finite element; Posterior cervical fixation; Stress; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; TRANSARTICULAR SCREW; PEDICLE SCREWS; SPINE; STABILIZATION; BIOMECHANICS; MYELOPATHY; ANTERIOR; SEGMENT; MIDDLE;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-011-1711-z
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study was to compare the following three main fixation techniques: pedicle screw (PS) technique, lateral mass screw (LS) technique, and transarticular screw (TS) technique. A detailed, geometrically accurate, nonlinear C3-C7 FE model had been successfully developed and validated. Then three finite element (FE) models were reconstructed by different fixation techniques following C4-C6 level laminectomy. A compressive preload of 74 N combined with a pure moment of 1.8 Nm in flexion, extension, left-right lateral bending, and left-right axial rotation was applied to the models. The results showed that maximum von Mises stress on the fixation devices was much higher in the FE models of TS technique, compared with the models of PS and LS techniques. Furthermore, the screws inserted by TS technique had high stress concentration at the middle part of the screws. Screw inserted by PS and LS techniques had high stress concentration at the actual cap-rod-screw interface. The highest level of maximal stress was obtained with the fixation device of the TS technique. TS technique induces noticeable differences in the stress compared to the posterior cervical fixation technique, regarding the higher stress level on fixation devices.
引用
收藏
页码:1552 / 1559
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Biomechanical evaluation of posterior cervical stabilization after a wide laminectomy
    Grubb, MR
    Currier, BL
    Stone, J
    Warden, KE
    An, KN
    SPINE, 1997, 22 (17) : 1948 - 1954
  • [33] Percutaneous posterior cervical transfacet fixation
    Ahmad, Faiz U.
    Wang, Michael Y.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2017, 27 (04) : 482 - 482
  • [34] Biomechanical comparison of posterior cervical fixation
    Mihara, H
    Cheng, BC
    David, SM
    Ohnari, K
    Zdeblick, TA
    SPINE, 2001, 26 (15) : 1662 - 1667
  • [35] POSTERIOR METHYLMETHACRYLATE FIXATION FOR CERVICAL TRAUMA
    EISMONT, FJ
    BOHLMAN, HH
    SPINE, 1981, 6 (04) : 347 - 353
  • [36] Limited laminectomy with lateral mass screw fixation versus normal laminectomy for multi-segment cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a comparative analysis
    Kang, Xiao
    Xiang, Shengxia
    Pei, Shishen
    Li, Shixue
    Wang, Qinghe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2020, 13 (04): : 2295 - 2303
  • [37] Biomechanical analysis of posterior fixation techniques in a 360° arthrodesis model
    Burton, D
    McIff, T
    Fox, T
    Lark, R
    Asher, MA
    Glattes, RC
    SPINE, 2005, 30 (24) : 2765 - 2771
  • [38] CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF EXTENSIVE CERVICAL LAMINECTOMY
    ISHIDA, Y
    SUZUKI, K
    OHMORI, K
    KIKATA, Y
    HATTORI, Y
    NEUROSURGERY, 1989, 24 (02) : 215 - 222
  • [39] Cervical Alignment Following Posterior Cervical Fusion Surgery Cervical Pedicle Screw Versus Lateral Mass Screw Fixation
    Lee, Subum
    Cho, Dae-Chul
    Roh, Sung Woo
    Jeon, Sang Ryong
    Moon, Eun Ji
    Lee, Jung Jae
    Park, Jin Hoon
    SPINE, 2021, 46 (10) : E576 - E583
  • [40] CERVICAL FACET FUSION FOR CONTROL OF INSTABILITY FOLLOWING LAMINECTOMY
    CALLAHAN, RA
    JOHNSON, RM
    MARGOLIS, RN
    KEGGI, KJ
    ALBRIGHT, JA
    SOUTHWICK, WO
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1977, 59 (08): : 991 - 1002