Non-invasive prenatal screening for Emanuel syndrome

被引:8
|
作者
Luo, Yuqin [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Jie [2 ]
Sun, Yixi [1 ,2 ]
Qian, Yeqing [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Liya [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Min [1 ,2 ]
Dong, Minyue [1 ,2 ]
Jin, Fan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Womens Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Reprod Genet, 1 Xueshi Rd, Hangzhou 310006, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Key Lab Reprod Genet, Minist Educ, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Womens Hosp, Ctr Reprod Med, Sch Med, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
NIPS; Emanuel syndrome (ES); Supernumerary; Microduplication; Translocation; SNP Array; PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS; CELL-FREE DNA; CASE SERIES;
D O I
10.1186/s13039-020-0476-7
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Objective The aim of this study was to validate the results of two Emanuel syndromes detected by non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) screening using invasive methods, providing clinical performance of NIPS on chromosome microduplication detection. Methods NIPS was performed to diagnose the Emanuel syndrome. Amniocentesis or cordocentesis was performed to confirm the positive screening result of Emanuel syndrome cases. Fetal sample was detected by karyotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and single nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP Array). Parental karyotyping and FISH were also carried out. Results Two cases with chromosomal abnormalities of 11q23.3q25 and 22q11.1q11.21 were found by NIPS. Chromosomal karyotyping showed that the two fetuses each have a small supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC), SNP Array further demonstrated double duplications approximately 18 Mb in 11q23.3q25 and 3 Mb in 22q11.1q11.21. FISH confirmed that the small supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC) was ish der(22)t(11;22) (TUPLE1+, ARSA-). Ultrasound scan and MRI showed some structure malformations in two fetuses. The two mothers were found to be a balanced carrier: 46,XX, t(11;22)(q23.3;q11.2). Conclusion NIPS could effectively identify Emanuel syndrome, which may indicate risks of a parent being a balanced rearrangement carrier. The followed confirmation test for positive sample is necessary and ensures the accuracy of the diagnosis.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] NON-INVASIVE PRENATAL TESTING The promise of non-invasive prenatal testing needs to be monitored scientifically
    Lonardo, Fortunato
    Gioacchino, Scarano
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 350
  • [42] Advantages and Disadvantages of Different Implementation Strategies of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing in Down Syndrome Screening Programmes
    Mersy, Elke
    de Die-Smulders, Christine E. M.
    Coumans, Audrey B. C.
    Smits, Luc J. M.
    de Wert, Guido M. W. R.
    Frints, Suzanna G. M.
    Veltman, Joris A.
    PUBLIC HEALTH GENOMICS, 2015, 18 (05) : 260 - 271
  • [43] Experience in the Application of Non-invasive Prenatal Screening for the Detection of Down Syndrome in Russia: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Kudryavtseva, Elena, V
    Kovalev, Vladislav V.
    Baranov, Igor I.
    Dektyarev, Andrew A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH AND REPRODUCTION SCIENCES, 2022, 10 (04): : 180 - 185
  • [44] Non-invasive prenatal testing: use of cell-free fetal DNA in Down syndrome screening
    Rafi, Imran
    Hill, Melissa
    Hayward, Judith
    Chitty, Lyn S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2017, 67 (660): : 298 - +
  • [45] A cost-effectiveness analysis of using non-invasive prenatal testing as a screening tool for Down syndrome
    Ohno, Mika
    Allen, Allison
    Cheng, Yvonne
    Shaffer, Brian
    Blumenfeld, Yair
    Norton, Mary
    Caughey, Aaron
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 208 (01) : S235 - S235
  • [46] Non-invasive prenatal screening of fetal Down syndrome by maternal plasma DNA sequencing in twin pregnancies
    Lau, Tze Kin
    Jiang, Fuman
    Chan, Mei Ki
    Zhang, Hongyun
    Lo, Pui Shan Salome
    Wang, Wei
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2013, 26 (04): : 434 - 437
  • [47] The clinical utility of genome-wide non-invasive prenatal screening
    Bono, S.
    Pizzuti, F.
    Duca, S.
    Polverari, A.
    Faieta, M.
    Antonucci, S.
    Baldi, M.
    Diano, L.
    Viola, D.
    Predebon, G.
    Spinella, F.
    Fiorentino, F.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2018, 26 : 146 - 147
  • [48] Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21: replacing invasive testing or replacing screening?
    Verweij, E. J.
    de Boer, Marjon
    van Scheltema, Phebe N. Adama
    van den Oever, Jessica M. E.
    Boon, Elles M. J.
    Oepkes, Dick
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 206 (01) : S313 - S313
  • [49] Combined Model-Based Prediction for Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening
    Yang, So-Yun
    Kang, Kyung Min
    Kim, Sook-Young
    Lim, Seo Young
    Jang, Hee Yeon
    Hong, Kirim
    Cha, Dong Hyun
    Shim, Sung Han
    Joung, Je-Gun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2022, 23 (23)
  • [50] Improving the Positive Predictive Value of Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening (NIPS)
    Strom, Charles M.
    Anderson, Ben
    Tsao, David
    Zhang, Ke
    Liu, Yan
    Livingston, Kayla
    Elzinga, Christopher
    Evans, Matthew
    Quoclinh Nguyen
    Wolfson, David
    Rowland, Charles
    Kolacki, Paula
    Maxwell, Megan
    Wang, Jia-Chi
    Rabin, Douglas
    Catanese, Joseph
    Owen, Renius
    Braastad, Corey
    Sun, Weimin
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (03):