Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: technique and short-term outcome for 29 consecutive patients

被引:45
|
作者
Leong, Quor M. [1 ,2 ]
Son, Dong N. [1 ]
Cho, Jae S. [1 ]
Baek, Se J. [1 ]
Kwak, Jung M. [1 ]
Amar, Azali H. [1 ]
Kim, Seon H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Coll Med, Anam Hosp, Seoul 136705, South Korea
[2] Tan Tock Seng Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Singapore 308433, Singapore
关键词
Cancer; Intersphincteric; Rectal; Robot; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; LAPAROSCOPIC RESECTION; ANTERIOR RESECTION; COLOANAL ANASTOMOSIS; ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES; SURGERY; DISSECTION; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-011-1657-6
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Intersphincteric resection (ISR) for low rectal cancer has been described as the ultimate sphincter-saving procedure. Laparoscopic ISR has been proved safe with early postoperative benefits. Recently, some colorectal surgeons have begun to perform robot-assisted ISR to harness the advantages of the da Vinci robotic system. The authors present their short-term results for a robotic technique of ISR. Data from 29 consecutive patients at a single institution with very low rectal cancer (< 4 cm) from the anal verge who underwent robot-assisted ISR were prospectively collected between December 2007 and March 2010. The study enrolled 23 men and 6 women with a median age of 61.5 years (range, 36-82 years). Their median body mass index (BMI) was 23.3 kg/m(2) (range, 17.9-32.5 kg/m(2)). The median distance of the tumor from the anal verge was 3 cm (range, 1-4 cm). The median operative time was 325 min (range, 235-435 min), with a console time of 130 min (range, 110-210 min). There were no conversions to open surgery. A protecting ileostomy was performed for all the patients. The median blood loss was less than 50 ml (range, < 50-1,000 ml). The median size of the tumor was 3 cm (range, 0-6.9 cm), and the median number of lymph nodes harvested was 16 (range, 1-44). The median distal margin was 0.8 cm (range, 0-4 cm), and one margin was positive. The circumferential margin was negative (> 2 mm) for 27 patients. Therefore, complete resection (R0) was achieved for 26 (90%) of the 29 patients. The median hospital stay was 9 days (range, 5-15 days). Nine patients experienced complications, including three anastomotic leaks (10%). All the leaks were managed conservatively. No surgical mortalities occurred. Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer is feasible, and its short-term outcome is acceptable.
引用
收藏
页码:2987 / 2992
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection: A Feasible Technique or the Treatment of Choice for Patients with Low Rectal Cancer?
    Peeters, K. C. M. J.
    Stassen, L. P. S.
    DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 28 (5-6) : 410 - 411
  • [32] Clinical outcome of intersphincteric resection for ultra-low rectal cancer
    Chih-ChienChin
    Wen-ShihHuang
    Jeng-YiWang
    Chien-Yuh Yeh
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2006, (04) : 640 - 643
  • [33] Clinical outcome of intersphincteric resection for ultra-low rectal cancer
    Chin, Chih-Chien
    Yeh, Chien-Yuh
    Huang, Wen-Shih
    Wang, Jeng-Yi
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 12 (04) : 640 - 643
  • [34] Evaluation of short-term outcomes after laparoscopically assisted abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer
    Wang, Zheng
    Zhang, Xing-Mao
    Liang, Jian-Wei
    Hu, Jun-Jie
    Zeng, Wei-Gen
    Zhou, Zhi-Xiang
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 84 (11) : 842 - 846
  • [35] CLINICAL OUTCOME OF INTERSPHINCTERIC RESECTION FOR ULTRA-LOW RECTAL CANCER
    Ignatov, Valentin L.
    Kolev, Nikola Y.
    Tonev, Anton Y.
    Ivanov, Georgi H.
    Zlatarov, Aleksander K.
    Todorov, Georgi
    Platikanov, Velian
    Ivanov, Krasimir D.
    JOURNAL OF IMAB, 2012, 18 (01): : 226 - 230
  • [36] Outcome one year after robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery: a consecutive cohort study
    Harslof, Sanne
    Stouge, Anders
    Thomassen, Niels
    Ravn, Sissel
    Laurberg, Soren
    Iversen, Lene Hjerrild
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2017, 32 (12) : 1749 - 1758
  • [37] Outcome one year after robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery: a consecutive cohort study
    Sanne Harsløf
    Anders Stouge
    Niels Thomassen
    Sissel Ravn
    Søren Laurberg
    Lene Hjerrild Iversen
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2017, 32 : 1749 - 1758
  • [38] Short-term and long-term efficacy in robot-assisted treatment for mid and low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wu, Huiming
    Guo, Renkai
    Li, Huiyu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2023, 39 (01)
  • [39] Oncological and anorectal functional outcomes of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection in lower rectal cancer, particularly the extent of sphincter resection and sphincter saving
    Kim, Jin Cheon
    Lee, Jong Lyul
    Bong, Joon Woo
    Seo, Ji Hyun
    Kim, Chan Wook
    Park, Seong Ho
    Kim, Jihoon
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (05): : 2082 - 2094
  • [40] Comparing short-term outcomes of robot-assisted and conventional laparoscopic total mesorectal excision surgery for rectal cancer in elderly patients
    Yang, Hao
    Yang, Gang
    Wu, Wen-Ya
    Wang, Fang
    Yao, Xue-Quan
    Wu, Xiao-Yu
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2024, 16 (05):