Metrics for Verification and Validation of Architecture in Powertrain Software Development

被引:5
|
作者
Venkitachalam, Hariharan [1 ]
Richenhagen, Johannes [2 ]
Schlosser, Axel [2 ]
Tasky, Thomas [3 ]
机构
[1] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Inst Combust Engines, Forckenbeckstr 4, D-52074 Aachen, Germany
[2] FEV GmbH, D-52078 Aachen, Germany
[3] FEV NA Inc, Auburn Hills, MI 48326 USA
关键词
Software Architecture; Quality; Verification and Validation; Metrics;
D O I
10.1145/2752489.2752496
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The key challenges to software development in the powertrain domain are an exploding complexity, short development cycles and increasing quality and safety requirements. Architecture design addresses these challenges by structuring development over the entire lifecycle. Being a work product of the very early stage of development, architecture design errors lead to rework and higher development costs at any following development step. Verification and validation on architecture level leads to significant quality increase and reduces development risks. To approach this in a structured manner, the authors propose automated metric based evaluation of the software architecture. Metrics are identified and developed based on the Goal Question Metric approach. Quality goals for the architecture are derived from international standards, organizational goals and domain specific requirements. Questions are developed based on the goals to derive metrics for the evaluation of software quality criteria. The metrics developed are integrated into the software development process. At the end, application examples from series hybrid control software projects are shown. By the automated, metric-based approach so far extensive manual reviews and scenario analyses are supported by objective and measurable criteria. As an added value to state-of-the-art development strategies, frontloading of the costs is achieved by early evaluation of the software architecture.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 33
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Verification and Validation for Trustworthy Software Systems
    Michael, James Bret
    Drusinsky, Doron
    Otani, Thomas W.
    Shing, Man-Tak
    IEEE SOFTWARE, 2011, 28 (06) : 86 - 92
  • [32] A Review on Verification and Validation for Embedded Software
    Perez, Y. M.
    Marin, H. A. P.
    Bedoya, A. E.
    IEEE LATIN AMERICA TRANSACTIONS, 2016, 14 (05) : 2339 - 2347
  • [33] VALIDATION, VERIFICATION, AND TESTING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE
    ADRION, WR
    BRANSTAD, MA
    CHERNIAVSKY, JC
    COMPUTING SURVEYS, 1982, 14 (02) : 159 - 192
  • [34] VALIDATION AND VERIFICATION OF SOFTWARE PROCESS MODELS
    GRUHN, V
    LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE, 1991, 509 : 271 - 286
  • [35] Software Development Metrics With a Purpose
    Gonzalez-Barahona, Jesus M.
    Izquierdo-Cortazar, Daniel
    Robles, Gregorio
    COMPUTER, 2022, 55 (04) : 66 - 73
  • [36] Communication metrics for software development
    Dutoit, AH
    Bruegge, B
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 1998, 24 (08) : 615 - 628
  • [37] Communication metrics for software development
    Bruegge, B
    Dutoit, AH
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1997 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 1997, : 271 - 281
  • [38] Software development risk metrics
    Lane, PD
    COMPUTER, 2002, 35 (04) : 6 - 6
  • [39] DEVELOPMENT OF METRICS FOR SOFTWARE RM
    WALTERS, GF
    MCCALL, JA
    PROCEEDINGS ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM, 1978, (NSYM): : 79 - 85
  • [40] WiseCFD V2023: A software framework with open architecture to support verification and validation and credibility assessment of CFD software
    Li, Li
    Liang, Yihua
    Yang, Yong
    Wu, Junsheng
    Hangkong Xuebao/Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45 (20):