Comparison of Elevation Change Detection Methods From ICESat Altimetry Over the Greenland Ice Sheet

被引:28
|
作者
Felikson, Denis [1 ]
Urban, Timothy J. [1 ]
Gunter, Brian C. [2 ]
Pie, Nadege [1 ]
Pritchard, Hamish D. [3 ]
Harpold, Robert [4 ]
Schutz, Bob E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Georgia Inst Technol, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[3] British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge CB3 0ET, England
[4] NOAA, Silver Spring, MD 20910 USA
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING | 2017年 / 55卷 / 10期
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
Altimetry; change detection algorithms; Greenland; ice thickness; remote sensing; MASS-BALANCE; LASER ALTIMETRY; ANTARCTICA; DYNAMICS; CLIMATE; IMPACT; VOLUME; LAND;
D O I
10.1109/TGRS.2017.2709303
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Estimation of the surface elevation change of the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) is essential for understanding its response to recent and future climate change. Laser measurements from the NASA's Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite (ICESat) created altimetric surveys of GrIS surface elevations over the 2003-2009 operational period of the mission. This paper compares four change detection methods using Release 634 ICESat laser altimetry data: repeat tracks (RTs), crossovers (XOs), overlapping footprints (OFPs), and triangulated irregular networks (TINs). All four methods begin with a consistently edited data set and yield estimates of volumetric loss of ice from the GrIS ranging from -193 to -269 km(3)/yr. Using a uniform approach for quantifying uncertainties, we find that volume change rates at the drainage system scale from the four methods can be reconciled within 1-sigma uncertainties in just 5 of 19 drainage systems. Ice-sheet-wide volume change estimates from the four methods cannot be reconciled within 1-sigma uncertainties. Our volume change estimates lie within the range of previously published estimates, highlighting that the choice of method plays a dominant role in the scatter of volume change estimates. We find that for much of the GrIS, the OFP and TIN methods yield the lowest volume change uncertainties because of their superior spatial distribution of elevation change rate estimates. However, the RT and XO methods offer inherent advantages, and the future work to combine the elevation change detection methods to produce better estimates is warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:5494 / 5505
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Elevation change of the southern Greenland ice sheet from 1978 to 1988: Interpretation
    Davis, CH
    McConnell, JR
    Bolzan, J
    Bamber, JL
    Thomas, RH
    Mosley-Thompson, E
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2001, 106 (D24) : 33743 - 33754
  • [22] WHAT HAVE WE LEARNT FROM ICESAT ON GREENLAND ICE SHEET CHANGE AND WHAT TO EXPECT FROM CURRENT ICESAT-2
    Bukac, Blazenka
    Grgic, Marijan
    Basic, Tomislav
    GEODETSKI VESTNIK, 2021, 65 (01) : 94 - 109
  • [23] Surface roughness over the northern half of the Greenland Ice Sheet from airborne laser altimetry
    van der Veen, C. J.
    Ahn, Y.
    Csatho, B. M.
    Mosley-Thompson, E.
    Krabill, W. B.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-EARTH SURFACE, 2009, 114
  • [24] Measuring Height Change Around the Periphery of the Greenland Ice Sheet With Radar Altimetry
    Gray, Laurence
    Burgess, David
    Copland, Luke
    Langley, Kirsty
    Gogineni, Prasad
    Paden, John
    Leuschen, Carl
    van As, Dirk
    Fausto, Robert
    Joughin, Ian
    Smith, Ben
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2019, 7
  • [25] 2003-2008 Ice Sheet Elevation Change on the Lake Vostok, Antarctica, From ICESat
    Shi, Hongling
    Lu, Yang
    Bao, Lifeng
    Du, Zongliang
    Zhang, Zizhan
    2008 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY AND TRAINING AND 2008 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, VOL 2, PROCEEDINGS,, 2009, : 561 - 564
  • [26] Assessing backscatter change due to backscatter gradient over the Greenland ice sheet using Envisat and SARAL altimetry
    Su, Xiaoli
    Luo, Zhicai
    Zhou, Zebing
    JOURNAL OF GEODYNAMICS, 2018, 117 : 41 - 48
  • [27] Comparison of Greenland ice sheet topography measured by TOPSAR and airborne laser altimetry
    Bindschadler, R
    Fahnestock, M
    Sigmund, A
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1999, 37 (05): : 2530 - 2535
  • [28] Surface roughness on the Greenland ice sheet from airborne laser altimetry
    van der Veen, CJ
    Krabill, WB
    Csatho, BM
    Bolzan, JF
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1998, 25 (20) : 3887 - 3890
  • [29] Aircraft laser altimetry measurement of elevation changes of the greenland ice sheet: technique and accuracy assessment
    Krabill, WB
    Abdalati, W
    Frederick, EB
    Manizade, SS
    Martin, CF
    Sonntag, JG
    Swift, RN
    Thomas, RH
    Yungel, JG
    JOURNAL OF GEODYNAMICS, 2002, 34 (3-4) : 357 - 376
  • [30] Comparison of Antarctic Ice sheet elevation between ICESat GLAS and InSAR DEM
    Yamanokuchi, Tsutomu
    Doi, Koichiro
    Shibuya, Kazuo
    2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, VOLS 1-8, 2006, : 2712 - +