EEG miniaturization limits for stimulus decoding with EEG sensor networks

被引:6
|
作者
Narayanan, Abhijith Mundanad [1 ,2 ]
Zink, Rob [1 ]
Bertrand, Alexander [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Elect Engn ESAT, Stadius Ctr Dynam Syst Signal Proc & Data Analyt, Kasteelpk Arenberg 10, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
[2] Leuven AI KU Leuven Inst AI, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
EEG; auditory attention decoding; miniaturization; neural decoding; neural signal processing; SELECTION; SPEECH; BRAIN;
D O I
10.1088/1741-2552/ac2629
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective. Unobtrusive electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring in everyday life requires the availability of highly miniaturized EEG devices (mini-EEGs), which ideally consist of a wireless node with a small scalp area footprint, in which the electrodes, amplifier and wireless radio are embedded. By attaching a multitude of mini-EEGs at relevant positions on the scalp, a wireless 'EEG sensor network' (WESN) can be formed. However, each mini-EEG in the network only has access to its own local electrodes, thereby recording local scalp potentials with short inter-electrode distances. This is unlike using traditional cap-EEG, which by the virtue of re-referencing can measure EEG across arbitrarily large distances on the scalp. We evaluate the implications and limitations of such far-driven miniaturization on neural decoding performance. Approach. We collected 255-channel EEG data in an auditory attention decoding (AAD) task. As opposed to previous studies with a lower channel density, this new high-density dataset allows emulation of mini-EEGs with inter-electrode distances down to 1 cm in order to identify and quantify the lower bound on miniaturization for EEG-based stimulus decoding. Main results. We demonstrate that the performance remains reasonably stable for inter-electrode distances down to 3 cm, but decreases quickly for shorter distances if the mini-EEG nodes can be placed at optimal scalp locations and orientations selected by a data-driven algorithm. Significance. The results indicate the potential for the use of mini-EEGs in a WESN context for AAD applications and provide guidance on inter-electrode distances while designing such devices for neuro-steered hearing devices.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] EEG - ACTUAL INDICATIONS AND LIMITS
    TAPIE, P
    TUILLAS, M
    CROGUENNEC, JM
    LEPETIT, JM
    GAZETTE MEDICALE, 1985, 92 (07): : 51 - 56
  • [22] Decoding EEG for optimizing naturalistic memory
    Rudoler, Joseph H.
    Bruska, James P.
    Chang, Woohyeuk
    Dougherty, Matthew R.
    Katerman, Brandon S.
    Halpern, David J.
    Diamond, Nicholas B.
    Kahana, Michael J.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2024, 410
  • [23] LIMITS OF VALIDITY OF EEG METHOD
    DONDEY, M
    ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1973, 34 (07): : 751 - 751
  • [24] Decoding the Development of Face Processing With EEG
    Mares, Ines
    Ewing, Louise
    Farran, Emily
    Papasavva, Michael
    Smith, Fraser W.
    Smith, Marie L.
    PERCEPTION, 2019, 48 : 75 - 75
  • [25] Neural decoding of music from the EEG
    Daly, Ian
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01):
  • [26] EEG Source Imaging of Movement Decoding
    Handiru, Vikram Shenoy
    Vinod, A. P.
    Guan, Cuntai
    IEEE SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS MAGAZINE, 2018, 4 (02): : 14 - 23
  • [27] Neural decoding of music from the EEG
    Ian Daly
    Scientific Reports, 13 (1)
  • [28] An empirical comparison of neural networks and machine learning algorithms for EEG gait decoding
    Nakagome, Sho
    Trieu Phat Luu
    He, Yongtian
    Ravindran, Akshay Sujatha
    Contreras-Vidal, Jose L.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [29] Cross-paradigm pretraining of convolutional networks improves intracranial EEG decoding
    Behncke, Joos
    Schirrmeister, Robin T.
    Voelker, Martin
    Hammer, Jiri
    Marusic, Petr
    Schulze-Bonhage, Andreas
    Burgard, Wolfram
    Ball, Tonio
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS (SMC), 2018, : 1046 - 1053
  • [30] An empirical comparison of neural networks and machine learning algorithms for EEG gait decoding
    Sho Nakagome
    Trieu Phat Luu
    Yongtian He
    Akshay Sujatha Ravindran
    Jose L. Contreras-Vidal
    Scientific Reports, 10