Remifentanil-propofol versus sufentanil-propofol anaesthesia for supratentorial craniotomy:: a randomized trial

被引:47
|
作者
Gerlach, K
Uhlig, T
Hüppe, M
Nowak, G
Schmitz, A
Saager, L
Grasteit, A
Schmucker, P
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Lubeck, Anasthesiol Klin, Dept Anaesthesiol, D-23538 Lubeck, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Lubeck, Dept Neurosurg, Lubeck, Germany
关键词
anaesthesia and analgesia; anaesthesia recovery period; anaesthesia general; anaesthetics intravenous; propofol; remifentanil; sufentanil; signs and symptoms; nausea; pain; vomiting;
D O I
10.1097/00003643-200310000-00007
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and objective: Remifentanil has unique pharmacokinetics that might allow faster recovery after neurosurgery. We investigated the effects of a propofol/sufentanit versus a remifentanil/propofol regimen on the primary end-point tracheal extubation time. Methods: In the Neurosurgery Department of a University Hospital, 36 patients awaiting craniotomy for supratentorial turnout resection were randomly assigned to one of two study groups. In the sufentanil/propofol group, anaesthesia was induced with 0.5 mug kg(-1) sufentanil and 1-2 mg kg(-1) propofol. Propofol infusion and boluses of sufentanil were administered for maintenance. In the remifentanil/propofol group, anaesthesia was started with an infusion of remifentanil (0.2-0.35 mug kg(-1) min(-1)) and a bolus of propofol (1.5-2 mg kg(-1)). Patients received a propofol infusion and a remifentanil infusion for maintenance of anaesthesia. Recovery times were taken from cessation of the propofol infusion. In addition, data about self-reported nausea and vomiting, pain and analgesic requirements were collected. Results: Patients in the remifentanil/propofol group were extubated earlier (mean times 6.4 (+/-SD 4.7) versus 14.3 (+/-9.2) min; P = 0.003). The two groups were similar with respect to postoperative nausea and vomiting, and patient-reported pain scores. Fifty per cent of the remifentanil/propofol patients and 8896 of the sufentanil/propofol patients required no analgesics within 1 h after operation (P =0.03). Conclusions: The remifentanil/propofol regimen provided quicker recovery. The two regimens were similar in terms of postoperative nausea and vomiting and patient-reported pain scores, but patients in the remifentanil/ propofol group required more analgesics within 1 h postoperatively.
引用
收藏
页码:813 / 820
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Dexmedetomidine vs propofol-remifentanil conscious sedation for awake craniotomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial
    Goettel, N.
    Bharadwaj, S.
    Venkatraghavan, L.
    Mehta, J.
    Bernstein, M.
    Manninen, P. H.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 116 (06) : 811 - 821
  • [32] Comparison Effects of Propofol-Dexmedetomidine versus Propofol-Remifentanil for Endoscopic Ultrasonography: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Trial
    Zhao, Liang
    Zhang, Yonglai
    Xu, Shoucai
    Wang, Xiuqin
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 2022
  • [33] Propofol versus propofol-remifentanil combination anaesthesia in electroconvulsive therapy: Effects on seizure duration and hemodynamics
    Algul, Ayhan
    Sen, Huseyin
    Ates, M. Alpay
    Yen, Tamer
    Ozkan, Sezai
    Durmaz, Onur
    Erbinc, Servet
    Dagli, Guner
    Cetin, Mesut
    KLINIK PSIKOFARMAKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2009, 19 : S153 - S154
  • [34] Propofol versus propofol-remifentanil combination anaesthesia in electroconvulsive therapy: Effects on seizure duration and hemodynamics
    Algul, Ayhan
    Sen, Hueseyin
    Ates, M. Alpay
    Yen, Tamer
    Durmaz, Onur
    Ozkan, Sezai
    Basoglu, Cengiz
    Semiz, Ue Basar
    Ebrinc, Servet
    Dagli, Guener
    Cetin, Mesut
    KLINIK PSIKOFARMAKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2009, 19 (01): : 24 - 28
  • [35] Recovery of psychomotor function after total intravenous anesthesia with remifentanil-propofol or fentanyl-propofol
    Takayama, Aki
    Yamaguchi, Shigeki
    Ishikawa, Kazuyoshi
    Shinozaki, Mio
    Kimura, Yoshiyuki
    Nagao, Masaru
    Kitajima, Toshimitsu
    JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2012, 26 (01) : 34 - 38
  • [36] Anaesthesia for direct laryngoscopy with propofol and fentanyl or sufentanil
    Uma srivastava
    Abhijeet Rajan Mishra
    Siddharth Sharma
    Dharmendra Kumar
    Aditya Kumar
    S. Saxena
    Imran Khan
    Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, 2008, 60 : 314 - 316
  • [37] Anaesthesia for direct laryngoscopy with propofol and fentanyl or sufentanil
    Srivastava, Uma
    Mishra, Abhijeet Rajan
    Sharma, Siddharth
    Kumar, Dharmendra
    Kumar, Aditya
    Saxena, S.
    Khan, Imran
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2008, 60 (04) : 314 - 316
  • [38] Sevoflurane versus PRopofol combined with Remifentanil anesthesia Impact on postoperative Neurologic function in supratentorial Gliomas (SPRING): protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Xing, Yan
    Lin, Nan
    Han, Ruquan
    Bebawy, John F.
    Peng, Yuming
    Li, Jiaxin
    Liu, Xiaoyuan
    Li, Yan
    Dong, Jia
    Zeng, Min
    Zhang, Manyu
    Nie, Lanyi
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [39] Sevoflurane versus PRopofol combined with Remifentanil anesthesia Impact on postoperative Neurologic function in supratentorial Gliomas (SPRING): protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Yan Xing
    Nan Lin
    Ruquan Han
    John F. Bebawy
    Yuming Peng
    Jiaxin Li
    Xiaoyuan Liu
    Yan Li
    Jia Dong
    Min Zeng
    Manyu Zhang
    Lanyi Nie
    BMC Anesthesiology, 20
  • [40] Remifentanil-Propofol Sedation as an Ambulatory Anesthesia for Carpal Tunnel Release
    Lee, Jae-Jun
    Hwang, Sung Mi
    Jang, Ji Su
    Lim, So Young
    Heo, Dong-Hwa
    Cho, Yong Jun
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY, 2010, 48 (05) : 429 - 433