An R&D options selection model for investment decisions

被引:101
|
作者
Coldrick, S [1 ]
Longhurst, P
Ivey, P
Hannis, J
机构
[1] Cranfield Univ, Sch Engn, Cranfield MK43 0AL, Beds, England
[2] Cranfield Univ, Sch Ind & Mfg Sci, Cranfield MK43 0AL, Beds, England
[3] Alstom Power UK Ltd, Lincoln, NE USA
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
project selection; portfolio management;
D O I
10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00099-3
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Technology centered organisations must be able to identify promising new products or process improvements at an early state so that the, necessary resources can be allocated to those activities. It is essential to invest in targeted R&D projects as opposed to a wide range of ideas so that resources can be focused on successful outcomes. Typically, a number of options and tradeoffs are encountered: the selection of the most appropriate projects is the aim of R&D selection models. Although capital budgeting and financial portfolio management offer a similar style approach, the techniques used for the solution of those is different to that used for R&D project selection. The reasons for this are, that project selection is complicated by many factors, such as uncertainty, interrelationships between projects, changes over time and success factors that are difficult to measure. Thus, a mathematical optimisation approach in isolation is not practical. Project selection models not only have to consider these problems but also that there are different types of R&D. The spectrum of R&D ranges from low budget exploratory research to large budget product development. This paper reviews the development of a project selection and evaluation tool that can be applied to a wide range of research, technology and investment decisions. Firstly. the background on project selection models is given. This is followed by the introduction of the model and its application to a sample group of projects. Finally, some conclusions are discussed as to the applicability of such models. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 193
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Stock options, R&D, and the R&D tax credit
    Brown, Jennifer L.
    Krull, Linda K.
    ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2008, 83 (03): : 705 - 734
  • [22] Chinese foreign direct investment in R&D in Europe: A new model of R&D internationalization?
    Di Minin, Alberto
    Zhang, Jieyin
    Gammeltoft, Peter
    EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2012, 30 (03) : 189 - 203
  • [23] Equity Incentives and R&D Investment: A Contract Model
    Xia, Yun
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2012 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT INNOVATION AND PUBLIC POLICY (ICMIPP 2012), VOLS 1-6, 2012, : 1904 - 1907
  • [24] Transport costs and investment in R&D in the duopoly model
    El Haoud, Naima
    Saber, Brahim
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LOGISTICS OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT (GOL'16), 2016,
  • [25] Real R&D options
    Newton, DP
    Paxson, DA
    Widdicks, M
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2004, 5-6 (02) : 113 - 130
  • [26] A fuzzy set approach for R&D portfolio selection using a real options valuation model
    Wang, Juite
    Hwang, W. -L.
    OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2007, 35 (03): : 247 - 257
  • [27] A management model for technology and R&D selection
    AlMazidi, S
    Ghosn, AA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 1997, 13 (5-6) : 525 - 541
  • [28] Valuation of options in R&D
    Pizmoht, P.
    Polajnar, A.
    Palcic, I.
    ANNALS OF DAAAM FOR 2005 & PROCEEDINGS OF THE 16TH INTERNATIONAL DAAAM SYMPOSIUM: INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING & AUTOMATION: FOCUS ON YOUNG RESEARCHES AND SCIENTISTS, 2005, : 303 - 304
  • [29] Competitive analysis of R&D investment with R&D budget constraint and R&D uncertainty
    Gao, Xing
    Wang, Ying
    MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, 2023, 44 (04) : 2438 - 2456
  • [30] The Research of the Factors that Influence the Debt Financing Constraints on R&D Investment Decisions
    Wen Zhijia
    Proceedings of the Second International Symposium - Management, Innovation and Development, 2015, : 717 - 723