Sustainability assemblages: From metrics development to metrics implementation in United States agriculture

被引:14
|
作者
Konefal, Jason [1 ,4 ]
Hatanaka, Maki [1 ]
Strube, Johann [2 ]
Glenna, Leland [2 ]
Conner, David [3 ]
机构
[1] Sam Houston State Univ, Huntsville, TX USA
[2] Penn State Univ, State Coll, PA USA
[3] Univ Vermont, Burlington, VT USA
[4] Dept Sociol, POB 2446, Huntsville, TX 77341 USA
关键词
Agriculture; Metrics; Governance; Sustainability; Assemblages; STANDARDS; FOOD;
D O I
10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.10.023
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Metrics that assess farmer sustainability performance have emerged as a leading approach to fostering continuous improvement in the sustainability of agriculture. As multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs) have developed sustainability metrics for US agriculture, these initiatives are entering a new phase focused on the adoption of metrics. This paper examines the approaches being used by two MSIs, Field to Market and the Stewardship Index for Specialty Crops (SISC), to promote their respective metrics to farmers. Drawing on assemblage theory, we analyze the processes that MSIs are using to get their metrics implemented, and how the actual adoption of metrics takes place in agrifood supply chains. Specifically, we identify five processes that both Field to Market and SISC are using to facilitate the implementation of their metrics: (1) leveraging members, (2) utilizing supply chains, (3) providing technical assistance, (4) building technological platforms, and (5) creating partnerships. In identifying these processes, our analysis shifts understanding of metrics adoption beyond just consumer and market forces, and focuses attention on the specific actors and processes through which sustainability metrics are put into practice. In concluding, we highlight ongoing challenges facing Field to Market and SISC's efforts to construct assemblages around their metrics.
引用
收藏
页码:502 / 509
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Development and implementation of a benchmarking and metrics program for construction performance and productivity improvement
    Nasir, Hassan
    Haas, Carl T.
    Rankin, Jeff H.
    Fayek, Aminah Robinson
    Forgues, Daniel
    Ruwanpura, Janaka
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2012, 39 (09) : 957 - 967
  • [22] A NATIONAL SURVEY OF THE USE OF ONCOLOGY PATIENT NAVIGATION METRICS AND REPORTING IN THE UNITED STATES
    Valverde, Patricia A.
    Calhoun, Elizabeth
    Dwyer, Andrea J.
    Wells, Kristen J.
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2020, 54 : S675 - S675
  • [23] What Concerns Game Developers? A Study on Game Development Processes, Sustainability and Metrics
    Kasurinen, Jussi
    Palacin-Silva, Maria
    Vanhala, Erno
    2017 IEEE/ACM 8TH WORKSHOP ON EMERGING TRENDS IN SOFTWARE METRICS (WETSOM), 2017, : 15 - 21
  • [24] Quality Assurance, Metrics, and Improving Standards in Rectal Cancer Surgery in the United States
    Xu, Zhaomin
    Fleming, Fergal J.
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [25] Evaluation of Stroke Care Metrics in Safety Net Hospitals across United States
    Pujara, Deep
    Shaker, Faris
    Imam, Bita
    Reddy, Sujan
    Parsha, Kaushik
    Sitton, Clark W.
    Kamal, Haris
    Sarraj, Amrou
    ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2019, 86 : S172 - S172
  • [26] How Inaccurate Metrics Hide the True Potential for Organ Donation in the United States
    Siminoff, Laura A.
    Gardiner, Heather M.
    Wilson-Genderson, Maureen
    Shafer, Teresa J.
    PROGRESS IN TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 28 (01) : 12 - 18
  • [27] USE OF QUALITY OF CARE (QOC) METRICS AMONG ONCOLOGISTS IN THE UNITED STATES (US)
    Narayanan, S.
    Hautamaki, E.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (07) : A482 - A482
  • [28] Urban sustainability implementation and indicators in the United States: A systematic review
    Pallathadka, Arun
    Chang, Heejun
    Ajibade, Idowu
    CITY AND ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS, 2023, 19
  • [29] Private Sector Metrics Contributions to Social Change: Customer Satisfaction Meets Agriculture Development
    Bonbright, David
    Power, Jamey
    IDS BULLETIN-INSTITUTE OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2010, 41 (06): : 65 - 72
  • [30] The Politics of Development Metrics and Measurement: Impact Evaluations in Fairtrade-certified Plantation Agriculture
    Lyall, Angus
    Havice, Elizabeth
    DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, 2019, 50 (06) : 1531 - 1553