Ethical Dilemmas in Qualitative Research: A Critical Literature Review

被引:26
|
作者
Taquette, Stella R. [1 ]
Borges da Matta Souza, Luciana Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estado Rio De Janeiro, Med Sci Coll, Dept Pediat, 444 Prof Manoel de Abreu Ave,2 Floor Vila Isabel, BR-20550170 Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS | 2022年 / 21卷
关键词
ethical inquiry; methods in qualitative inquiry; virtual environments; secondary data analysis; observational research; focus groups; autoethnography; HEALTH RESEARCH; REFLEXIVITY; ISSUES; REFLECTIONS; CHALLENGES; STRATEGIES; GUIDELINES; PEOPLE; TOPICS; FIELD;
D O I
10.1177/16094069221078731
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The respect for ethical principles is required during the entire scientific research process, including the dissemination phase. Due to the dynamism of qualitative studies, there are often adverse ethical situations. The aim of this integrative review was to analyze and synthetize ethical dilemmas that occur during the progress of qualitative investigation and the strategies proposed to face them. The search for studies used LILACS and MEDLINE databases with descriptors "research ethics" and "qualitative research", originating 108 titles. Upon reading all titles, 42 articles were elected according to the inclusion criteria. The main conflicts were related to confidentiality breach, disregard of autonomy, potential damages, confusion about the roles of researcher/therapist/friend, and impasses in the Research Ethics Committees. Various types of conflicts may occur in a research. The solutions proposed are based on self-awareness, reflexivity, continuous consent, and ethical mindfulness.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review
    Barnett-Page, Elaine
    Thomas, James
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2009, 9
  • [42] Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review
    Elaine Barnett-Page
    James Thomas
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9
  • [43] Review of models for the analysis of ethical dilemmas
    Ruiz-Cano, Jennifer
    Cantu-Quintanilla, Guillermo R.
    Avila-Montiel, Diana
    Domingo Gamboa-Marrufo, Jose
    Juarez-Villegas, Luis E.
    de Hoyos-Bermea, Adalberto
    Chavez-Lopez, Adrian
    Estrada-Ramirez, Karla P.
    Merelo-Arias, Carlos A.
    Altamirano-Bustamante, Myriam M.
    de la Vega-Morell, Nahum
    Pelaez-Ballestas, Ingris
    Guadarrama-Orozco, Jessica H.
    Munoz-Hernandez, Onofre
    Garduno-Espinosa, Juan
    BOLETIN MEDICO DEL HOSPITAL INFANTIL DE MEXICO, 2015, 72 (02): : 89 - 98
  • [44] Ethical dilemmas and moral distress in pharmacy: A qualitative study
    Crnjanski, Tatjana
    Krajnovic, Dusanka
    Stojkov-Rudinski, Svetlana
    Tadic, Ivana
    HEALTHMED, 2012, 6 (07): : 2485 - 2493
  • [45] Nurses experiences of ethical dilemmas: A review
    Haahr, Anita
    Norlyk, Annelise
    Martinsen, Bente
    Dreyer, Pia
    NURSING ETHICS, 2020, 27 (01) : 258 - 272
  • [46] A Qualitative Research Survey on Cardiologist's Ethical Stance in Cases of Moral Dilemmas in Cardiology Clinics
    Buruk, Banu
    Ekmekci, Perihan Elif
    Celebi, Aksueyek Savas
    Gunes, Begum
    HEALTH CARE ANALYSIS, 2024,
  • [47] Invisible Vulnerabilities: Ethical, Practical and Methodological Dilemmas in Conducting Qualitative Research on the Interaction with IVF Embryos
    Delaunay, Catarina
    Augusto, Amelia
    Santos, Mario
    SOCIETIES, 2020, 10 (01):
  • [48] Ethical Community-Engaged Research: A Literature Review
    Mikesell, Lisa
    Bromley, Elizabeth
    Khodyakov, Dmitry
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 103 (12) : E7 - E14
  • [49] The regulatory considerations and ethical dilemmas of location-based services (LBS) A literature review
    Abbas, Roba
    Michael, Katina
    Michael, M. G.
    INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & PEOPLE, 2014, 27 (01) : 2 - 20
  • [50] The ethical issues of social assistive robotics: A critical literature review
    Pareto Boada, Julia
    Roman Maestre, Begona
    Torras Genis, Carme
    TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2021, 67