Remote sensing and wetland ecology: a South African case study

被引:29
|
作者
De Roeck, Els R. [1 ]
Verhoest, Niko E. C. [2 ]
Miya, Mtemi H. [1 ]
Lievens, Hans [2 ]
Batelaan, Okke [3 ,4 ]
Thomas, Abraham [5 ]
Brendonck, Luc [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Lab Aquat Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, Lab Hydrol & Water Management, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[3] Vrije Univ Brussels, Dept Hydrol & Hydraul Engn, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
[4] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Earth & Environm Sci, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium
[5] Univ Western Cape, Dept Earth Sci, ZA-7535 Bellville, Cape Town, South Africa
来源
SENSORS | 2008年 / 8卷 / 05期
关键词
wetland monitoring; wetland distribution and density; wetland ecology; Landsat; Envisat;
D O I
10.3390/s8053542
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Remote sensing offers a cost efficient means for identifying and monitoring wetlands over a large area and at different moments in time. In this study, we aim at providing ecologically relevant information on characteristics of temporary and permanent isolated open water wetlands, obtained by standard techniques and relatively cheap imagery. The number, surface area, nearest distance, and dynamics of isolated temporary and permanent wetlands were determined for the Western Cape, South Africa. Open water bodies (wetlands) were mapped from seven Landsat images (acquired during 1987 - 2002) using supervised maximum likelihood classification. The number of wetlands fluctuated over time. Most wetlands were detected in the winter of 2000 and 2002, probably related to road constructions. Imagery acquired in summer contained fewer wetlands than in winter. Most wetlands identified from Landsat images were smaller than one hectare. The average distance to the nearest wetland was larger in summer. In comparison to temporary wetlands, fewer, but larger permanent wetlands were detected. In addition, classification of non-vegetated wetlands on an Envisat ASAR radar image (acquired in June 2005) was evaluated. The number of detected small wetlands was lower for radar imagery than optical imagery (acquired in June 2002), probably because of deterioration of the spatial information content due the extensive pre-processing requirements of the radar image. Both optical and radar classifications allow to assess wetland characteristics that potentially influence plant and animal metacommunity structure. Envisat imagery, however, was less suitable than Landsat imagery for the extraction of detailed ecological information, as only large wetlands can be detected. This study has indicated that ecologically relevant data can be generated for the larger wetlands through relatively cheap imagery and standard techniques, despite the relatively low resolution of Landsat and Envisat imagery. For the characterisation of very small wetlands, high spatial resolution optical or radar images are needed. This study exemplifies the benefits of integrating remote sensing and ecology and hence stimulates interdisciplinary research of isolated wetlands.
引用
收藏
页码:3542 / 3556
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Remote Sensing as a Tool for Tropical Ecology
    Balzotti, Chris S.
    Petersen, Steven L.
    Terry, Richard E.
    Scherer, Andrew K.
    Golden, Charles
    GEOGRAPHY COMPASS, 2010, 4 (08): : 993 - 1012
  • [32] Remote Sensing of Spatiotemporal Changes in Wetland Geomorphology Based on Type 2 Fuzzy Sets: A Case Study of Beidagang Wetland from 1975 to 2015
    Huo, Hongyuan
    Guo, Jifa
    Li, Zhao-Liang
    Jiang, Xiaoguang
    REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 9 (07):
  • [33] Fractal Analysis of Urban Wetland Shape Changes Using Remote Sensing - A Case Study of Nanhu Lake in Wuhan
    Zeng Zhongping
    Liu Yaobin
    2008 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY AND TRAINING AND 2008 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, VOL 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 298 - +
  • [34] Remote Sensing of Riparian and Wetland Buffers: An Overview
    Klemas, Victor
    JOURNAL OF COASTAL RESEARCH, 2014, 30 (05) : 869 - 880
  • [35] REMOTE-SENSING OF WETLAND BIOMASS AND PRODUCTIVITY
    HARDISKY, MA
    KLEMAS, V
    ESTUARIES, 1985, 8 (2B): : A7 - A7
  • [36] Remote Sensing of Coastal Wetland Biomass: An Overview
    Klemas, Victor
    JOURNAL OF COASTAL RESEARCH, 2013, 29 (05) : 1016 - 1028
  • [37] Remote sensing for wetland classification: a comprehensive review
    Mahdavi, Sahel
    Salehi, Bahram
    Granger, Jean
    Amani, Meisam
    Brisco, Brian
    Huang, Weimin
    GISCIENCE & REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 55 (05) : 623 - 658
  • [38] Inundation patterns in the Pantanal wetland of South America determined from passive microwave remote sensing
    Hamilton, SK
    Sippel, SJ
    Melack, JM
    ARCHIV FUR HYDROBIOLOGIE, 1996, 137 (01): : 1 - 23
  • [39] Assessing, with limited resources, the ecological outcomes of wetland restoration: a South African case
    Kotze, Donovan C.
    Tererai, Farai
    Grundling, Piet-Louis
    RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2019, 27 (03) : 495 - 503
  • [40] Wetland spatial dynamics and mitigation study: an integrated remote sensing and GIS approach
    Sivakumar, R.
    Ghosh, Snehasish
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2016, 80 (02) : 975 - 995