User behavior in a real-world peer-to-peer electricity market

被引:74
|
作者
Ableitner, Liliane [1 ]
Tiefenbeck, Verena [1 ,2 ]
Meeuw, Arne [3 ]
Woerner, Anselma [1 ]
Fleisch, Elgar [1 ,3 ]
Wortmann, Felix [3 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Weinbergstr 56, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
[3] Univ St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland
关键词
Peer-to-peer energy market; User behavior; Price setting; Distributed energy resources; Web application; Blockchain; COMMUNITY ENERGY-STORAGE; SHARING ECONOMY; FEEDBACK; PEOPLE; SENSE; CONSUMPTION; TECHNOLOGY; SYSTEMS; CHOICE; SECTOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115061
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Peer-to-peer (P2P) energy markets are a widely discussed approach toward a sustainable energy supply that allows private owners of distributed energy resources (e.g., solar panels) and consuming households to trade energy directly without intermediaries. P2P energy markets are expected to contribute to a green, local, and fair energy system in the future. The approach implies a paradigm shift regarding the role of citizens who evolve from passive consumers into active market participants. While first existing research primarily focused on the technical feasibility of such scenarios, end users and their role in P2P markets have received little attention. The present article studies the behavior of 35 households and two commercial entities in Switzerland's first real-world P2P energy market. In this unique real-world setting, based on a mixed methods approach, we developed and deployed a web application and empirically studied interaction, acceptance, and participation in electricity pricing in this P2P energy market, using data from system logs, surveys, and interviews. The findings are threefold. First, the P2P energy market was well received among its users, indicated by comparably high and stable usage activity of the web application throughout the study (4.5 months). Second, users in the sample are heterogeneous; based on their engagement with the web application and their stated preferences, they can be categorized into those who want to actively set prices (30%); those who prefer automated prices determined by an information system (35%); and non-users/non-respondents to surveys (35%). Third, an analysis of interviews with nine households suggests that P2P energy markets may increase the salience of renewable energies and may promote load-shifting activities. Thus, the article provides empirical insights about the user behavior of households and their future role in decentralized energy scenarios.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Peer to Peer observation: real-world faculty development
    Shapiro, Neil
    Janjigian, Michael
    Schaye, Verity
    Hauck, Kevin
    Becker, Daniel
    Lusk, Penelope
    Dembitzer, Anne
    MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2019, 53 (05) : 513 - 514
  • [22] Supporting peer-to-peer user communities
    Vassileva, J
    ON THE MOVE TO MEANINGFUL INTERNET SYSTEMS 2002: COOPLS, DOA, AND ODBASE, 2002, 2519 : 230 - 247
  • [23] Framework of locality electricity trading system for profitable peer-to-peer power transaction in locality electricity market
    Rao, Bokkisam Hanumantha
    Arun, Saravana Loganathan
    Selvan, Manickavasagam Parvathy
    IET SMART GRID, 2020, 3 (03) : 318 - 330
  • [24] A Peer-to-Peer Electricity System and Its Simulation
    Chen, Zhe
    Xu, Peng
    Chen, Yongbao
    4TH ASIA CONFERENCE OF INTERNATIONAL BUILDING PERFORMANCE SIMULATION ASSOCIATION, 2019, 238
  • [25] Peer-to-Peer Trading in Electricity Networks: An Overview
    Tushar, Wayes
    Saha, Tapan Kumar
    Yuen, Chau
    Smith, David
    Poor, H. Vincent
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2020, 11 (04) : 3185 - 3200
  • [26] Distributed photovoltaics with peer-to-peer electricity trading
    Li Z.
    Ma T.
    Energy and Built Environment, 2022, 3 (04): : 424 - 432
  • [27] Peer-to-peer electricity transactions considering electricity grid constraints
    Botelho, Daniel F.
    Soares, Tiago A.
    Peters Barbosa, Pedro H.
    Dias, Bruno H.
    de Oliveira, Leonardo W.
    Moraes, Camile A.
    2021 14TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS (INDUSCON), 2021, : 69 - 75
  • [28] New Transactions in Electricity: Peer-to-Peer and Peer-to-X
    Glachant, Jean-Michel
    Rossetto, Nicolo
    ECONOMICS OF ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2021, 10 (02) : 41 - 55
  • [29] Bidding Agent for Electric Vehicles in Peer-to-Peer Electricity Trading Market considering uncertainty
    Waseda, Futa
    Tanaka, Kenji
    2020 20TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENT AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND 2020 4TH IEEE INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL POWER SYSTEMS EUROPE (EEEIC/I&CPS EUROPE), 2020,
  • [30] Real-world insights from launching remote peer-to-peer mentoring in a safety net healthcare delivery setting
    Lyles, Courtney R.
    Sarkar, Urmimala
    Patel, Urvashi
    Lisker, Sarah
    Stark, Allison
    Guzman, Vanessa
    Patel, Ashwin
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2021, 28 (02) : 365 - 370