ETHICAL REVIEW OF BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH IN BELARUS: CURRENT STATUS, PROBLEMS AND PERSPECTIVES

被引:0
|
作者
Famenka, Andrei [1 ]
机构
[1] State Serv Legal Med, Minsk, BELARUS
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
research ethics; research ethics committees; Belarus; COMMITTEES; TRANSITION; COUNTRIES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The paper provides description of the system of ethical review for biomedical research in Belarus, with special emphasis on its historical background, legal and regulatory framework, structure and functioning. It concludes that the situation with research ethics in Belarus corresponds to the tendency of bureaucratic approach to establishment of systems of ethical review for biomedical research, observed in a number of countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Different social, economical and political factors of transition have major impact on capacities of the Belarusian RECs to ensure adequate protection of human subjects. Among the main problems identified are non-equivalent stringency of ethical review for different types of biomedical research; lack of independence, multidisciplinarity, pluralism and lay representation experienced by RECs; low level of research ethics education and transparency of RECs activities. Recommendations are made to raise the issue of research ethics on the national agenda in order to develop and maintain the research ethics system capable to effectively protect research participants and promote ethical conduct in research.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 83
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Atmospheric microplastics: A review on current status and perspectives
    Zhang, Yulan
    Kang, Shichang
    Allen, Steve
    Allen, Deonie
    Gao, Tanguang
    Sillanpaa, Mika
    EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2020, 203
  • [32] Biomedical applications of metallic nanoparticles in cancer: Current status and future perspectives
    Khursheed, Rubiya
    Dua, Kamal
    Vishwas, Sukriti
    Gulati, Monica
    Jha, Niraj Kumar
    Aldhafeeri, Ghalib Mohammed
    Alanazi, Fayez Ghadeer
    Goh, Bey Hing
    Gupta, Gaurav
    Paudel, Keshav Raj
    Hansbro, Philip M.
    Chellappan, Dinesh Kumar
    Singh, Sachin Kumar
    BIOMEDICINE & PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2022, 150
  • [33] Ethical dimensions of biomedical research
    Corbinos, Lorenzo Agar
    ACTA BIOETHICA, 2021, 27 (02): : 299 - 300
  • [34] The ethical minefields of biomedical research
    Balaram, P
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2001, 81 (04): : 329 - 330
  • [35] Ethical concerns in biomedical research
    Brochard, L
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2002, 28 (07) : 820 - 821
  • [36] Current perspectives on symptom perception in asthma: A biomedical and psychological review
    Simon Rietveld
    Jos F. Brosschot
    International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 1999, 6 : 120 - 134
  • [37] Current perspectives on symptom perception in asthma: A biomedical and psychological review
    Rietveld, S
    Brosschot, JF
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 1999, 6 (02) : 120 - 134
  • [38] Ethical jurisdictions in biomedical research
    Mfutso-Bengu, JM
    Taylor, TE
    TRENDS IN PARASITOLOGY, 2002, 18 (05) : 231 - 234
  • [39] Ethical concerns in biomedical research
    Laurent Brochard
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2002, 28 : 820 - 821
  • [40] Current research status of biomedical micro and nano technologies in Korea
    Lee, Y-S
    NANOMEDICINE-NANOTECHNOLOGY BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2006, 2 (04) : 298 - 298