Evaluation of the rapid diagnostic test SDFK40 (Pf-pLDH/pan-pLDH) for the diagnosis of malaria in a non-endemic setting

被引:26
|
作者
Maltha, Jessica [1 ,2 ]
Gillet, Philippe [2 ]
Cnops, Lieselotte [2 ]
Bottieau, Emmanuel [2 ]
Van Esbroeck, Marjan [2 ]
Bruggeman, Cathrien [3 ,4 ]
Jacobs, Jan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Med & Life Sci FHML, Fac Hlth, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Inst Trop Med ITM, Dept Clin Sci, Unit Trop Lab Med, Antwerp, Belgium
[3] Maastricht Infect Ctr, Sch Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Dept Med Microbiol, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, CAPHRI, Maastricht, Netherlands
来源
MALARIA JOURNAL | 2011年 / 10卷
关键词
PARASITE LACTATE-DEHYDROGENASE; EXPERT MICROSCOPY; FIELD; PERFORMANCE; ACCURACY; AREA;
D O I
10.1186/1475-2875-10-7
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: The present study evaluated the SD Bioline Malaria Ag 05FK40 (SDFK40), a three-band RDT detecting Plasmodium falciparum-specific parasite lactate dehydrogenase (Pf-pLDH) and pan Plasmodium-specific pLDH (pan-pLDH), in a reference setting. Methods: The SDFK40 was retrospectively and prospectively tested against a panel of stored (n = 341) and fresh (n = 181) whole blood samples obtained in international travelers suspected of malaria, representing the four Plasmodium species as well as Plasmodium negative samples, and compared to microscopy and PCR results. The prospective panel was run together with OptiMAL (Pf-pLDH/pan-pLDH) and SDFK60 (histidine-rich protein-2 (HRP-2)/pan-pLDH). Results: Overall sensitivities for P. falciparum tested retrospectively and prospectively were 67.9% and 78.8%, reaching 100% and 94.6% at parasite densities >1,000/mu l. Sensitivity at parasite densities <= 100/mu l was 9.1%. Overall sensitivities for Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium ovale were 86.7% and 80.0% (retrospectively) and 92.9% and 76.9% (prospectively), reaching 94.7% for both species (retrospective panel) at parasite densities >500/mu l. Sensitivity for Plasmodium malariae was 21.4%. Species mismatch occurred in 0.7% of samples (3/411) and was limited to non-falciparum species erroneously identified as P. falciparum. None of the Plasmodium negative samples in the retrospective panel reacted positive. Compared to OptiMAL and SDFK60, SDFK40 showed lower sensitivities for P. falciparum, but better detection of P. ovale. Inter-observer agreement and test reproducibility were excellent, but lot-to-lot variability was observed for pan-pLDH results in case of P. falciparum. Conclusion: SDFK40 performance was poor at low (<= 100/mu l) parasite densities, precluding its use as the only diagnostic tool for malaria diagnosis. SDFK40 performed excellent for P. falciparum samples at high (> 1,000/mu l) parasite densities as well as for detection of P. vivax and P. ovale at parasite densities > 500/mu l.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of the rapid diagnostic test SDFK40 (Pf-pLDH/pan-pLDH) for the diagnosis of malaria in a non-endemic setting
    Jessica Maltha
    Philippe Gillet
    Lieselotte Cnops
    Emmanuel Bottieau
    Marjan Van Esbroeck
    Cathrien Bruggeman
    Jan Jacobs
    Malaria Journal, 10
  • [2] Evaluation of the rapid diagnostic test CareStart pLDH Malaria (Pf-pLDH/pan-pLDH) for the diagnosis of malaria in a reference setting
    Marloes Heutmekers
    Philippe Gillet
    Jessica Maltha
    Annelies Scheirlinck
    Lieselotte Cnops
    Emmanuel Bottieau
    Marjan Van Esbroeck
    Jan Jacobs
    Malaria Journal, 11
  • [3] Evaluation of the rapid diagnostic test CareStart pLDH Malaria (Pf-pLDH/pan-pLDH) for the diagnosis of malaria in a reference setting
    Heutmekers, Marloes
    Gillet, Philippe
    Maltha, Jessica
    Scheirlinck, Annelies
    Cnops, Lieselotte
    Bottieau, Emmanuel
    Van Esbroeck, Marjan
    Jacobs, Jan
    MALARIA JOURNAL, 2012, 11
  • [4] Evaluation of the Clearview® malaria pLDH malaria rapid diagnostic test in a non-endemic setting
    Houze, Sandrine
    Hubert, Veronique
    Cohen, Dorit Pessler
    Rivetz, Baruch
    Le Bras, Jacques
    MALARIA JOURNAL, 2011, 10
  • [5] Evaluation of the Clearview® malaria pLDH malaria rapid diagnostic test in a non-endemic setting
    Sandrine Houzé
    Véronique Hubert
    Dorit Pessler Cohen
    Baruch Rivetz
    Jacques Le Bras
    Malaria Journal, 10
  • [6] Evaluation of the malaria rapid diagnostic test SDFK90: detection of both PfHRP2 and Pf-pLDH
    Marloes Heutmekers
    Philippe Gillet
    Lieselotte Cnops
    Emmanuel Bottieau
    Marjan Van Esbroeck
    Jessica Maltha
    Jan Jacobs
    Malaria Journal, 11
  • [7] Evaluation of the malaria rapid diagnostic test SDFK90: detection of both PfHRP2 and Pf-pLDH
    Heutmekers, Marloes
    Gillet, Philippe
    Cnops, Lieselotte
    Bottieau, Emmanuel
    Van Esbroeck, Marjan
    Maltha, Jessica
    Jacobs, Jan
    MALARIA JOURNAL, 2012, 11
  • [8] EVALUATION OF 3 RAPID DIAGNOSTIC TESTS (CARESTART™ MALARIA 3 LINE PLDH (PAN, PF), OPTIMAL-IT® PLDH (PAN, PF) AND CARESTART™ 2 LINE PLDH (PAN) FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF MALARIA IN MYANMAR
    Ashley, Elisabeth A.
    Touabi, Malek
    Ahrer, Margareta
    Hutagalung, Robert
    Htun, Khayae
    Lwin, Myo Min
    Koscalova, Alena
    Comte, Eric
    Hamade, Prudence
    Page, Anne-Laure
    Luchavez, Jennifer
    Proux, Stephane
    Nosten, Francois
    Guerin, Philippe J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2008, 79 (06): : 284 - 284
  • [9] Evaluation of a rapid diagnostic test (CareStart™ Malaria HRP-2/pLDH (Pf/pan) Combo Test) for the diagnosis of malaria in a reference setting
    Maltha, Jessica
    Gillet, Philippe
    Bottieau, Emmanuel
    Cnops, Lieselotte
    van Esbroeck, Marjan
    Jacobs, Jan
    MALARIA JOURNAL, 2010, 9
  • [10] Evaluation of a rapid diagnostic test (CareStart™ Malaria HRP-2/pLDH (Pf/pan) Combo Test) for the diagnosis of malaria in a reference setting
    Jessica Maltha
    Philippe Gillet
    Emmanuel Bottieau
    Lieselotte Cnops
    Marjan van Esbroeck
    Jan Jacobs
    Malaria Journal, 9