The political economy of academic publishing: On the commodification of a public good

被引:24
|
作者
Puehringer, Stephan [1 ]
Rath, Johanna [1 ]
Griesebner, Teresa [1 ]
机构
[1] Johannes Kepler Univ Linz, Inst Comprehens Anal Econ, Linz, Austria
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 06期
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0253226
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This paper provides an institutional and empirical analysis of the highly concentrated market of academic publishing, characterized by over proportionally high profit margins for publishing companies. The availability of latest research findings is an important issue for researchers, universities and politicians alike. Open access (OA) publication provides a promising but also costly solution to overcome this problem. However, in this paper we argue that OA publication costs are an important, but by far not the only way for academic publishers to gain access to public funding. In contrast, our study provides a comprehensive overview of the channels through which public expenditure benefits big academic publishing companies. Furthermore, we offer the results of an explorative case study, where we estimate the annual financial flows of public expenditures in Austria for the field of social sciences. In all, these expenditures add up to about 66.55 to 103.2 million euro a year, which amounts to a fourth of total public funding for this field. Against this background, we contribute to the debate whether and to what extent public subsidies are justified for economically successful companies.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条