Climate change, Paris accords and geological traps to sequester CO2 (Spain)

被引:0
|
作者
Martinez del Olmo, Wenceslao [1 ]
机构
[1] Oil & Gas Capital Sl, Angel Munoz 3, Madrid 28043, Spain
来源
REVISTA DE LA SOCIEDAD GEOLOGICA DE ESPANA | 2019年 / 32卷 / 02期
关键词
Climate change; Spain commitment; CO2; sequestration;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
In 2017 the Spain CO2 emissions reached the 338.8 Million Tons (MTm), 17,8% higher than the 1990 year of reference. Spain has set a 40% reduction commitment to reach in 2030. This means that from 2030 and subsequent years we must reduce our emissions by 110 MTm/year. There are two ways to achieve the commitment: reduce CO2 emissions and sequester the CO2 emitted in geological traps. The first is well known, the second is unknown and therefore we devote greater attention. The exploration of the Spain area has been overdrawn by the low number of exploratory wells per km(2) and by seismic lines having been made with technology of 30-40 years ago. It has led to: 1) That we import the 99.8% of the gas we consume, so changing thermal coal to thermal gas (which would reduce emissions by 60%) would increase our facture for imports of natural gas; 2) Our knowledge of geological sites where injected the CO2 be overdrawn. In 2009 the ALGECO2 program dealt studying the possibilities of these geological traps and concluded that 103 were possible but in need a major definition and only 13 were already reasonable. As not all possible traps are located where CO2 emissions are more bulky, can be expressed that combating emissions must be solidarity, which we believe is missing in many institutions that do not facilitate the acquisition of new data (seismic lines and wells) that would allow finalize the evaluation and selection of these traps where kidnap the unavoidable CO2 produced. The selection of possibilities for ALGECO2, its conclusions, uncertainties and problems, do this work that we completed with the inclusion of the best possibilities of our territorial waters and some other than by its strategic location should be taken into consideration. Finally is necessary to reduce the current $ 45/Tm of capture because they are much higher than the $25 of emission rights and many of private emissaries will prefer their pay and whit this option it would be difficult to reduce the CO2 emissions.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 106
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The "Paris Agreement" on Climate Change: An Opportunity for Cement Sector to Further Reduce its CO2 Emissions
    Fonta, Philippe
    2017 IEEE-IAS/PCA CEMENT INDUSTRY TECHNICAL CONFERENCE, 2017,
  • [22] Climate change -: Illuminating the modern dance of climate and CO2
    Cox, Peter
    Jones, Chris
    SCIENCE, 2008, 321 (5896) : 1642 - 1644
  • [23] Future Gen to produce hydrogen, sequester CO2
    Advanced Materials and Processes, 2005, 163 (04):
  • [24] Quality of geological CO2 storage to avoid jeopardizing climate targets
    Torvanger, Asbjorn
    Grimstad, Alv-Arne
    Lindeberg, Erik
    Rive, Nathan
    Rypdal, Kristin
    Skeie, Ragnhild Bieltvedt
    Fuglestvedt, Jan
    Tollefsen, Petter
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2012, 114 (02) : 245 - 260
  • [25] Quality of geological CO2 storage to avoid jeopardizing climate targets
    Asbjørn Torvanger
    Alv-Arne Grimstad
    Erik Lindeberg
    Nathan Rive
    Kristin Rypdal
    Ragnhild Bieltvedt Skeie
    Jan Fuglestvedt
    Petter Tollefsen
    Climatic Change, 2012, 114 : 245 - 260
  • [26] Enhanced Hydrate-Based Geological CO2 Capture and Sequestration as a Mitigation Strategy to Address Climate Change
    Pandey, Jyoti Shanker
    Daas, Yousef Jouljamal
    Karcz, Adam Paul
    von Solms, Nicolas
    ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (21)
  • [27] Estimating geological CO2 storage security to deliver on climate mitigation
    Juan Alcalde
    Stephanie Flude
    Mark Wilkinson
    Gareth Johnson
    Katriona Edlmann
    Clare E. Bond
    Vivian Scott
    Stuart M. V. Gilfillan
    Xènia Ogaya
    R. Stuart Haszeldine
    Nature Communications, 9
  • [28] Estimating geological CO2 storage security to deliver on climate mitigation
    Alcalde, Juan
    Flude, Stephanie
    Wilkinson, Mark
    Johnson, Gareth
    Edlmann, Katriona
    Bond, Clare E.
    Scott, Vivian
    Gilfillan, Stuart M. V.
    Ogaya, Xenia
    Haszeldine, R. Stuart
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2018, 9
  • [29] A review of mineral carbonation technologies to sequester CO2
    Sanna, A.
    Uibu, M.
    Caramanna, G.
    Kuusik, R.
    Maroto-Valer, M. M.
    CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS, 2014, 43 (23) : 8049 - 8080
  • [30] Climate change -: Scientists support curbing CO2
    Hileman, Bette
    CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2006, 84 (37) : 10 - 10