The choice of efficiency benchmarking metric in evaluating firm productivity and viability

被引:6
|
作者
West, S. C. [1 ]
Mugera, A. W. [1 ]
Kingwell, R. S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, UWA Inst Agr, Crawley, WA, Australia
[2] Australian Export Grains Innovat Ctr, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
Total factor productivity efficiency; Technical efficiency; Performance benchmarking; Agriculture; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; CENTRAL LIMIT-THEOREMS; TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY; AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY; DECOMPOSING PRODUCTIVITY; TECHNOLOGICAL-CHANGE; STOCHASTIC FRONTIER; PANEL-DATA; GENERALIZED-METHOD; PEASANT FARMERS;
D O I
10.1007/s11123-022-00628-1
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The Debreu-Farrell measure of technical efficiency is widely used to benchmark firm performance. A limitation of this measure is that it is orientation restricted and evaluates the performance of a decision-making unit in an explicit direction relative to the best-practice frontier and not the most productive point on the frontier. Therefore, the measure does not provide policy insight on how to direct decision-making units to achieve the best possible productivity level. Taking a departure from conventional nonparametric benchmarking studies, this study benchmarks the performance of commercial farm businesses in the Western Australia's wheatbelt region using total factor productivity efficiency ('TFP efficiency') and compares the results to those when the conventional technical efficiency measures are applied. We find that the two measures of firm performance differ and are influenced by different sources of firm heterogeneity. Therefore, derived policy insights and prescriptions also differ. This is an important insight that policymakers and practitioners need to be aware of.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 211
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The choice of efficiency benchmarking metric in evaluating firm productivity and viability
    S. C. West
    A. W. Mugera
    R. S. Kingwell
    Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2022, 57 : 193 - 211
  • [2] Innovation efficiency and firm performance in a benchmarking context
    Kanellopoulos, Vassilis
    Tsekouras, Kostas
    MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, 2023, 44 (01) : 137 - 151
  • [3] From Firm Productivity Dynamics to Aggregate Efficiency
    Lopez-Martin, Bernabe
    WORLD BANK ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2017, 30 : S57 - S66
  • [4] That old-time religion: Efficiency, benchmarking, and productivity
    Gooden, ST
    McCreary, SM
    PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2001, 61 (01) : 116 - 120
  • [5] Total factor productivity or labor productivity? Firm heterogeneity and location choice of multinationals
    Tang, Meng-Chi
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2017, 49 : 499 - 514
  • [6] Methods for Benchmarking the Firm Performance and Its Influence on the Efficiency Indicators
    Fratila, Laurentiu
    Sova, Robert
    Tipa, Stelian
    Ion, Luminita
    INNOVATION AND SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: FROM REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT TO WORLD ECONOMIES, VOLS 1-5, 2012, : 1499 - 1508
  • [7] Choice of metric in the measurement of relative productive efficiency
    Ritchie, PC
    Rowcroft, JE
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 1996, 46 (46-47) : 433 - 439
  • [8] GBench: benchmarking methodology for evaluating the energy efficiency of supercomputers
    Subramaniam, Balaji
    Feng, Wu-chun
    COMPUTER SCIENCE-RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 28 (2-3): : 221 - 230
  • [9] Reallocation, firm turnover, and efficiency: Selection on productivity or profitability?
    Foster, Lucia
    Haltiwanger, John
    Syverson, Chad
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2008, 98 (01): : 394 - 425
  • [10] Efficiency measures and productivity indexes in the context of university library benchmarking
    Reichmann, Gerhard
    Sommersguter-Reichmann, Margit
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2010, 42 (03) : 311 - 323