Methods for Benchmarking the Firm Performance and Its Influence on the Efficiency Indicators

被引:0
|
作者
Fratila, Laurentiu [1 ]
Sova, Robert [1 ]
Tipa, Stelian [1 ]
Ion, Luminita [1 ]
机构
[1] Acad Econ Studies, Bucharest, Romania
关键词
Benchmarking; Business performance; Cross-impact analysis CIA method; Efficiency indicators; INDUSTRY; IMPACT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The paper relates to the findings offered by various researches in the field of performance management and consists of adjusting and suggestions for applying the cross impact method, and trend impact analysis on the possible correlated variables. Benchmarking is the process of comparing one's business processes and performance metrics to industry best practices. Dimensions typically measured are quality, time, and cost, but nost of the cases, a large number of financial and non-finalcial indicators are involved. In a new appropch, the present paper suggests the application of Cross-Impact Analysis to identify the most influencing factor of influence on various area of performance. The general CIA is used to identify, for deeper understanding, the correlation among a set of variables by revealing the characteristic role of a factor / variable in relation to all other variables within a system. The CIA method is used then to identify those variables that play a significant role in the improving the firm's performance in the future. Without a way to measure relevant financial and operational indicators, managers might find blocked in decision making relying on, eventually, educated guesswork. The key contributions and the novelty degree came from the newly envisaged method of making the connection among the possible events, factors of succes and scenario for business climate - all shaping the way in which the business process of creating value is designed to be benchmarked.
引用
收藏
页码:1499 / 1508
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Innovation efficiency and firm performance in a benchmarking context
    Kanellopoulos, Vassilis
    Tsekouras, Kostas
    MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, 2023, 44 (01) : 137 - 151
  • [2] Performance indicators and benchmarking evaluation of company efficiency
    Roberts, M
    22ND INTERNATIONAL WATER SERVICES CONGRESS AND EXHIBITION, 2000, 18 (1-2): : 658 - 661
  • [3] Benchmarking firm performance
    Dawkins, Peter
    Feeny, Simon
    Harris, Mark N.
    BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2007, 14 (06) : 693 - 710
  • [4] Benchmarking key performance indicators
    Longman, P.A.
    World Cement, 1999, 30 (05):
  • [5] Benchmarking performance indicators for banks
    Ho, Chien-Ta
    Wu, Yun-Shan
    BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2006, 13 (1-2) : 147 - 159
  • [6] Performance indicators and benchmarking evaluation of company efficiency: the system employed by WML in The Netherlands
    Huberts, J
    Smeets, E
    22ND INTERNATIONAL WATER SERVICES CONGRESS AND EXHIBITION, 2000, 18 (1-2): : 646 - 651
  • [7] Transportation price benchmarking: implications for firm performance
    Swanson, David
    BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2016, 23 (04) : 1015 - 1026
  • [8] Management of construction firm performance using benchmarking
    El-Mashaleh, Mohammad S.
    Minchin, R. Edward, Jr.
    O'Brien, William J.
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2007, 23 (01) : 10 - 17
  • [9] Benchmarking Analysis of Energy Efficiency Indicators in Paper Mill
    Zhang, Yanzhong
    Hong, Mengna
    Li, Jigeng
    Chen, Xiaobin
    Zeng, Zhiqiang
    Liu, Huanbin
    BIORESOURCES, 2016, 11 (04): : 9723 - 9740
  • [10] Benchmarking universities' efficiency indicators in the presence of internal heterogeneity
    Agasisti, Tommaso
    Bonomi, Francesca
    STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2014, 39 (07) : 1237 - 1255