Connective tissue graft as a biological barrier for guided tissue regeneration in intrabony defects: a histological study in dogs

被引:4
|
作者
Ribeiro, Fernando Salimon [1 ]
Farias Pontes, Ana Emilia [1 ]
Zuza, Elizangela Partata [1 ]
da Silva, Vanessa Camila [2 ]
Comelli Lia, Raphael Carlos [1 ]
Marcantonio Junior, Elcio [3 ]
机构
[1] Educ Fdn Barretos UNIFEB, Sch Dent, Dept Master Dent Sci, BR-14783226 Barretos, SP, Brazil
[2] Fed Univ Maranhao UFMA, Sch Dent, Dept Dent 2, Maranhao, MA, Brazil
[3] Sao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Sch Dent, Dept Diag & Surg, Araraquara, SP, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Connective tissue graft(s); Guided tissue regeneration; Periodontal regeneration; Histology; CONTROLLED CLINICAL-TRIAL; AUTOGENOUS PERIOSTEAL GRAFTS; PHOSPHATE BONE-CEMENT; PLATELET-RICH PLASMA; PERIODONTAL REGENERATION; FURCATION DEFECTS; POCKET REDUCTION; MEMBRANES; HUMANS; SUBPERIOSTEAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00784-014-1323-1
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background The use of the autogenous periosteal graft as biological barrier has been proposed for periodontal regeneration. The aim of this study was to evaluate the histometric findings of the subepithelial connective tissue graft as barrier in intrabony defects compared to a bioabsorbable membrane. Methods Three-walled intrabony defects were created surgically in the mesial aspect of the right and left maxillary canines in five healthy mongrel dogs. The defects were chronified, and two types of barriers were randomly carried out for guided tissue regeneration in a split-mouth design: the test group with a subepithelial connective tissue graft and the control group with a bioabsorbable membrane. The specimens were processed for histometric analyses of the epithelium (E), connective tissue (CT), newly formed cementum (NC), new bone (NB), and total newly formed tissues (NFT). Results The test side showed smaller mean of NC (3.6 +/- 1.2), NB (2.1 +/- 0.7), and NFT (7.7 +/- 0.8) than the control group (NC 7.3 +/- 0.5; NB 5.3 +/- 1.3; NFT 10.1 +/- 2.2; P<0.05). No statistically significant differences were verified for E (test 3.1 +/- 2.0; control 2.8 +/- 2.1; P>0.05) and CT (test 2.5 +/- 1.1; control 2.0 +/- 0.5; P>0.05) between groups. Conclusion The bioabsorbable membrane was more effective in maintaining the space for periodontal regeneration than periosteal connective graft when used as barrier. Clinical relevance The bioabsorbable membrane showed more favorable regenerative results in intrabony defects in dogs than the subepithelial connective tissue graft as biological barrier.
引用
收藏
页码:997 / 1004
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] CONNECTIVE-TISSUE REGENERATION TO PERIODONTALLY DISEASED TEETH - HISTOLOGICAL STUDY
    COLE, RT
    CRIGGER, M
    BOGLE, G
    EGELBERG, J
    SELVIG, KA
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH, 1980, 15 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [32] Biological properties of a biomimetic membrane for guided tissue regeneration: a study in rat calvarial defects
    Zhang, Jingchao
    Huang, Cui
    Xu, Qian
    Mo, Anchun
    Li, Jidong
    Zuo, Yi
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2010, 21 (04) : 392 - 397
  • [33] Guided tissue regeneration therapy of 203 consecutively treated intrabony defects using a bioabsorbable matrix barrier. Clinical and radiographic findings
    Falk, H
    Laurell, L
    Ravald, N
    Teiwik, A
    Persson, R
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1997, 68 (06) : 571 - 581
  • [34] Clinical and Histological Differences between Guided Tissue Regeneration with Acellular Dermal Matrix of Porcine Origin and Autologous Connective Tissue: An Animal Study
    Aragoneses, Javier
    Suarez, Ana
    Rodriguez, Cinthia
    Aragoneses, Juan Manuel
    MATERIALS, 2021, 14 (02) : 1 - 12
  • [35] Guided tissue regeneration with bioabsorbable and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene barrier membranes in the treatment of naturally occurring periodontal defects in dogs
    Elharar, F
    Rodriguez, HJ
    Benqué, EP
    Caffesse, RG
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1998, 69 (11) : 1218 - 1228
  • [36] Comparative study of two collagen membranes for guided tissue regeneration therapy in periodontal intrabony defects: a randomized clinical trial
    Chung, Young-Mi
    Lee, Jue-Yeon
    Jeong, Seong-Nyum
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL AND IMPLANT SCIENCE, 2014, 44 (04): : 194 - 200
  • [37] Recession treatment: Guided tissues regeneration versus subpedicle connective tissue graft.
    Tatakis, DN
    Trombelli, L
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 : 743 - 743
  • [38] Treatment of intrabony defects with guided tissue regeneration in aggressive periodontitis: clinical outcomes at 6 and 12 months
    Thanasak Rakmanee
    Gareth S Griffiths
    Gita Auplish
    Ulpee Darbar
    Aviva Petrie
    Irwin Olsen
    Nikolaos Donos
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2016, 20 : 1217 - 1225
  • [39] Guided tissue regeneration in conjunction with hydroxyapatite-collagen grafts for intrabony defects - A clinical and radiological evaluation
    Kilic, AR
    Efeoglu, E
    Yilmaz, S
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 1997, 24 (06) : 372 - 383
  • [40] Factors affecting the healing response of intrabony defects following guided tissue regeneration and access flap surgery
    Tonetti, MS
    Prato, GP
    Cortellini, P
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 1996, 23 (06) : 548 - 556