共 50 条
Evaluation of published assessment tools for comorbidity in liver transplantation: a systematic review protocol
被引:0
|作者:
Qu, Zhi
[1
,2
]
Gwiasda, Jill
[2
]
Schrem, Harald
[2
,3
]
Kaltenborn, Alexander
[2
]
Harries, Lena
[1
,2
]
Beneke, Jan
[2
]
Amelung, Volker
[1
,2
]
Krauth, Christian
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Hannover Med Sch, Inst Epidemiol Social Med & Hlth Syst Res, Hannover, Germany
[2] Hannover Med Sch, Integrated Res & Treatment Facil Transplantat IFB, Core Facil Qual Management & Hlth Technol Assessm, Hannover, Germany
[3] Hannover Med Sch, Gen Visceral & Transplant Surg, Hannover, Germany
来源:
关键词:
CO-MORBIDITY;
SURVIVAL;
IMPACT;
OUTCOMES;
INDEXES;
D O I:
10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021181
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
Introduction Liver transplantation is considered the best therapy option for end-stage liver disease. Different factors including recipient comorbidity at time of transplantation are supposed to have substantial impact on outcomes. Although several studies have focused on comorbidity assessment indices for liver transplant recipients, there is no systematic review available on the methodological details and prognostic accuracy of these instruments. The aim of this study is to systematically review recipient comorbidity assessment indices in the context of liver transplantation. Methods and analysis PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and PsyINFO databases will be searched. Studies describing, using or evaluating specific assessment tools to predict the effect of comorbidity on clinical outcomes after liver transplantation will be included. The selection will be conducted independently by two reviewers. The study characteristics and methodological information on published comorhidity assessment tools will he extracted into a predefined structural table. This approach will be deployed to systematically extract information on the validity, reliability and practical feasibility of investigated comorhidity assessment tools for comparative evaluation. Narrative information synthesis will be conducted, and additional meta-analytical comparison will be performed, if appropriate. Ethics and dissemination All data are collected from published literature. Thus, formal ethics review for the research is not required. The findings of this systematic review will he published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences. The results of this systematic review will be highly relevant for further research on prognostic models, clinical decision making and optimisation of donor organ allocation.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文