Evaluation of published assessment tools for comorbidity in liver transplantation: a systematic review protocol

被引:0
|
作者
Qu, Zhi [1 ,2 ]
Gwiasda, Jill [2 ]
Schrem, Harald [2 ,3 ]
Kaltenborn, Alexander [2 ]
Harries, Lena [1 ,2 ]
Beneke, Jan [2 ]
Amelung, Volker [1 ,2 ]
Krauth, Christian [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hannover Med Sch, Inst Epidemiol Social Med & Hlth Syst Res, Hannover, Germany
[2] Hannover Med Sch, Integrated Res & Treatment Facil Transplantat IFB, Core Facil Qual Management & Hlth Technol Assessm, Hannover, Germany
[3] Hannover Med Sch, Gen Visceral & Transplant Surg, Hannover, Germany
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2018年 / 8卷 / 06期
关键词
CO-MORBIDITY; SURVIVAL; IMPACT; OUTCOMES; INDEXES;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021181
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Liver transplantation is considered the best therapy option for end-stage liver disease. Different factors including recipient comorbidity at time of transplantation are supposed to have substantial impact on outcomes. Although several studies have focused on comorbidity assessment indices for liver transplant recipients, there is no systematic review available on the methodological details and prognostic accuracy of these instruments. The aim of this study is to systematically review recipient comorbidity assessment indices in the context of liver transplantation. Methods and analysis PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and PsyINFO databases will be searched. Studies describing, using or evaluating specific assessment tools to predict the effect of comorbidity on clinical outcomes after liver transplantation will be included. The selection will be conducted independently by two reviewers. The study characteristics and methodological information on published comorhidity assessment tools will he extracted into a predefined structural table. This approach will be deployed to systematically extract information on the validity, reliability and practical feasibility of investigated comorhidity assessment tools for comparative evaluation. Narrative information synthesis will be conducted, and additional meta-analytical comparison will be performed, if appropriate. Ethics and dissemination All data are collected from published literature. Thus, formal ethics review for the research is not required. The findings of this systematic review will he published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences. The results of this systematic review will be highly relevant for further research on prognostic models, clinical decision making and optimisation of donor organ allocation.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A systematic review of the quality of life assessment tools for cats in the published literature
    Doit, H.
    Dean, R. S.
    Duz, M.
    Brennan, M. L.
    VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2021, 272
  • [2] Liver Transplantation: Protocol for Recipient Selection, Evaluation, and Assessment
    Fatima, Ifrah
    Jahagirdar, Vinay
    V. Kulkarni, Anand
    Reddy, Raghuram
    Sharma, Mithun
    Menon, Balchandran
    Reddy, Duvvur Nageshwar
    Rao, Padaki Nagaraja
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 13 (05) : 841 - 853
  • [3] Evaluation of Current Assessment Tools for Walkability: A Systematic Review
    Yan, Hai
    RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 2018, 89 : A28 - A29
  • [4] Inappropriate prescribing: a systematic overview of published assessment tools
    Kaufmann, Carole P.
    Tremp, Regina
    Hersberger, Kurt E.
    Lampert, Markus L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2014, 70 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [5] Inappropriate prescribing: a systematic overview of published assessment tools
    Carole P. Kaufmann
    Regina Tremp
    Kurt E. Hersberger
    Markus L. Lampert
    European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2014, 70 : 1 - 11
  • [6] Acute kidney injury following liver transplantation: a systematic review of published predictive models
    Caragata, R.
    Wyssusek, K. H.
    Kruger, R.
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2016, 44 (02) : 251 - 261
  • [7] Identification and evaluation of neuropsychological tools used in the assessment of alcohol-related brain damage: A systematic review protocol
    Heirene, Robert
    Roderique-Davies, Gareth
    Roberts, Pamela
    John, Bev
    COGENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 3
  • [8] Comorbidity assessment tools and their influence on management decisions amongst men with prostate cancer: Systematic review
    Neerhut, Thomas
    Nguyen, Brian
    Rhee, Handoo
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 17 : 49 - 49
  • [9] A systematic review of the published evaluation tools assessing residents and attendings during on-call activities
    Perreault, Francois
    Veilleux-Carpentier, Ariane
    Stapf, Christian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2019, 14 (3_SUPPL) : 45 - 45
  • [10] Evaluation of teamwork assessment tools for interprofessional simulation: a systematic literature review
    Wooding, E. L.
    Gale, T. C.
    Maynard, V.
    JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2020, 34 (02) : 162 - 172