METHODS OF PREPARATION IN CONSERVATION OF MINIMALLY PROCESSED PRODUCTS OF CACTUS PEAR FRUITS

被引:1
|
作者
Marques, Kelly Magalhaes [1 ]
Mattiuz, Ben-Hur [2 ]
Ascari Morgado, Cristiane Maria [1 ]
Galati, Vanessa Cury [1 ]
Almeida Miguel, Ana Carolina [1 ]
机构
[1] FCAV UNESP, Programa Prod Vegetal, BR-14884900 Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
[2] FCAV UNESP, Dept Tecnol, BR-14884900 Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
关键词
Opuntia ficus indica; postharvest; minimally processed;
D O I
10.1590/S0100-29452011000500083
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of methods of preparation in postharvest conservation of minimally processed products of cactus pear fruits. Ripe cactus pear fruits orange-fleshed, from a commercial orchard in the region of Valinhos, SP, Brazil, were used. After selection, the fruits were washed and the surface sanitized with a solution of dichloro s. triazinatriona sodium dihydrate (Sumaveg (R)) 200 mg 100g(-1) of free chlorine for 5 minutes. Fruits were then stored at 12 degrees C for 12 hours before processing. The first process was the removal of the shell and ends. Then, the fruits were cut longitudinally into two halves, peeled and sliced in 2 cm thick cross-sections. The whole fruit, halves and slices were packaged in polyethylene terephthalate containers (Neoforma (R) N-94). These units were stored at 3 degrees C for 16 days and analyses were performed every 4 days. The weight loss, the content of soluble solids (SS), the titratable acidity (TA), the ratio (SS / TA) and the ascorbic acid content were evaluated and the sensory analysis of products was performed. Whole fruits were preferred concerning the purchase intent and showed better results regarding the content of soluble solids, titratable acidity, soluble solids / titratable acidity and ascorbic acid content. The highest weight loss was observed in slices.
引用
收藏
页码:606 / 611
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cactus Pear (Opuntia spp.) Germplasm Conservation in South Africa
    Potgieter, J. P.
    Mashope, B. K.
    VI INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON CACTUS PEAR AND COCHINEAL, 2009, 811 : 47 - 54
  • [42] MICROBIAL QUALITY AND LABELING OF MINIMALLY PROCESSED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES
    dos Santos, Lucas Samor
    da Silva, Lucas Vasconcelos
    Lepaus, Barbara Morandi
    Brilhante de Sao Jose, Jackline Freitas
    BIOSCIENCE JOURNAL, 2021, 37
  • [43] Hydrogen peroxide disinfection of minimally processed fruits and vegetables
    Sapers, GM
    Simmons, GF
    FOOD TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 52 (02) : 48 - 52
  • [44] Approaches for safety assessment of minimally processed fruits and vegetables
    Tapia, AS
    Welti-Chanes, J
    ENGINEERING AND FOOD FOR THE 21ST CENTURY, 2002, : 671 - 695
  • [45] Use of Vacuum Impregnation for Minimally Processed Fruits and Vegetables
    Tamer, C. E.
    Copur, O. U.
    VI INTERNATIONAL POSTHARVEST SYMPOSIUM, 2010, 877 : 577 - 582
  • [46] PROCESSING, PACKAGING, AND REGULATION OF MINIMALLY PROCESSED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES
    RONK, RJ
    CARSON, KL
    THOMPSON, P
    FOOD TECHNOLOGY, 1989, 43 (02) : 136 - 139
  • [47] Edible coatings for whole and minimally processed fruits and vegetables
    Nisperos, MO
    Baldwin, EA
    FOOD AUSTRALIA, 1996, 48 (01): : 27 - 31
  • [48] PROCESSING AND DISTRIBUTION ALTERNATIVES FOR MINIMALLY PROCESSED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES
    HUXSOLL, CC
    BOLIN, HR
    FOOD TECHNOLOGY, 1989, 43 (02) : 124 - 128
  • [49] PACKING TECHNOLOGY FOR FRESH AND MINIMALLY PROCESSED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES
    BARMORE, CR
    JOURNAL OF FOOD QUALITY, 1987, 10 (03) : 207 - 217
  • [50] Evalution of packaging in the conservation of minimally processed squash
    Lima, Keila Sousa
    Sanches, Alex Guimaraes
    Martins Cordeiro, Carlos Alberto
    APPLIED RESEARCH & AGROTECHNOLOGY, 2019, 12 (03): : 75 - 84