Tri-level decision-making with multiple followers: Model, algorithm and case study

被引:30
|
作者
Han, Jialin [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Jie [2 ]
Hu, Yaoguang [1 ]
Zhang, Guangquan [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Mech Engn, Ind & Syst Engn Lab, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Engn & Informat Technol, Ctr Quantum Computat & Intelligent Syst, Decis Syst & E Serv Intelligence Lab, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
基金
国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划); 澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Tri-level decision-making; Multilevel programming; Kth-Best algorithm; Fuzzy programming; Production-inventory planning; PROGRAMMING APPROACH; INTEGRATED PRODUCTION; INVENTORY MODEL; SUPPLY CHAIN; BILEVEL; OPTIMIZATION; LOCATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ins.2015.03.043
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Tri-level decision-making arises to address compromises among interacting decision entities distributed throughout a three-level hierarchy; these entities are respectively termed the top-level leader, the middle-level follower and the bottom-level follower. This study considers an uncooperative situation where multiple followers at the same (middle or bottom) level make their individual decisions independently but consider the decision results of their counterparts as references through information exchanged among themselves. This situation is called a reference-based uncooperative multi-follower tri-level (MFTL) decision problem which appears in many real-world applications. To solve this problem, we need to find an optimal solution achieving both the Stackelberg equilibrium in the three-level vertical structure and the Nash equilibrium among multiple followers at the same horizontal level. In this paper, we first propose a general linear MFTL decision model for this situation. We then develop a MFTL Kth-Best algorithm to find an optimal solution to the model. Since the optimal solution means a compromised result in the uncooperative situation and it is often imprecise or ambiguous for decision entities to identify their related satisfaction, we use a fuzzy programming approach to characterize and evaluate the solution obtained. Lastly, a real-world case study on production-inventory planning illustrates the effectiveness of the proposed MFTL decision techniques. (c) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:182 / 204
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A decision-making framework model for material selection using a combined multiple attribute decision-making method
    R. V. Rao
    J. P. Davim
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2008, 35 : 751 - 760
  • [42] The effects of authentic leadership on followers' ethical decision-making in the face of temptation: An experimental study
    Cianci, Anna M.
    Hannah, Sean T.
    Roberts, Ross P.
    Tsakumis, George T.
    LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2014, 25 (03): : 581 - 594
  • [43] LEVEL OF ASPIRATION AND DECISION-MAKING
    SIEGEL, S
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1957, 64 (04) : 253 - 262
  • [44] SIMULATION IN DECISION-MAKING - A CASE-STUDY
    SULE, DR
    TOLBERT, D
    GOMEZ, G
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 1981, 5 (04) : 227 - 244
  • [45] Conservation decision-making in the field: a case study
    Unruh, Julie
    Harbeck, Cricket
    JOURNAL OF THE INSTITUTE OF CONSERVATION, 2021, 44 (01) : 3 - 24
  • [46] Tianjin Binhai New Area: A Case Study of Multi-Level Streams Model of Chinese Decision-Making
    Zhu, Xufeng
    Sun, Bing
    JOURNAL OF CHINESE POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 14 (02) : 191 - 211
  • [47] Portfolio decision-making genres: A case study
    Kester, Linda
    Hultink, Erik Jan
    Lauche, Kristina
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2009, 26 (04) : 327 - 341
  • [48] COLLECTIVE DECISION-MAKING IN A KIBBUTZ - CASE STUDY
    HELMAN, A
    SHECHTER, M
    PUBLIC FINANCE-FINANCES PUBLIQUES, 1973, 28 (02): : 139 - 150
  • [49] Risk analysis and decision-making - A case study
    Gamble, B.
    Project Evaluation Conference 2007, 2007, 2007 (04): : 19 - 31
  • [50] MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING - A CASE-STUDY
    KELLER, HR
    MASSART, DL
    BRANS, JP
    CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 1991, 11 (02) : 175 - 189