Model Discrepancy Quantification in Simulation-Based Design of Dynamical Systems

被引:10
|
作者
Hu, Zhen [1 ]
Hu, Chao [2 ,3 ]
Mourelatos, Zissimos P. [4 ]
Mahadevan, Sankaran [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Ind & Mfg Syst Engn, 2340 Heinz Prechter Engn Complex HPEC, Dearborn, MI 48128 USA
[2] Iowa State Univ, Dept Mech Engn, 2026 Black Engn, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[3] Iowa State Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, 2026 Black Engn, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[4] Oakland Univ, Engn Ctr, Mech Engn Dept, Room 402D,115 Lib Dr, Rochester, MI 48309 USA
[5] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Engn, Stn B, 2201 West End Ave,Box 1831, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
model discrepancy; state variables; dynamical systems; discrete-time; state-space; model; ESTIMATING CAPACITY; UNCERTAINTY; CALIBRATION; OPTIMIZATION; FRAMEWORK; STATE;
D O I
10.1115/1.4041483
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Discrete-time state-space models have been extensively used in simulation-based design of dynamical systems. These prediction models may not accurately represent the true physics of a dynamical system due to potentially flawed understanding of the system, missing physics, and/or numerical approximations. To improve the validity of these models at new design locations, this paper proposes a novel dynamic model discrepancy quantification (DMDQ) framework. Time-instantaneous prediction models are constructed for the model discrepancies of "hidden" state variables, and are used to correct the discrete-time prediction models at each time-step. For discrete-time models, the hidden state variables and their discrepancies are coupled over two adjacent time steps. Also, the state variables cannot be directly measured. These factors complicate the construction of the model discrepancy prediction models. The proposed DMDQ framework overcomes these challenges by proposing two discrepancy modeling approaches: an estimation-modeling approach and a modeling-estimation approach. The former first estimates the model discrepancy and then builds a nonparametric prediction model of the model discrepancy; the latter builds a parametric prediction model of the model discrepancy first and then estimates the parameters of the prediction model. A subsampling method is developed to reduce the computational effort in building the two types of prediction models. A mathematical example and an electrical circuit dynamical system demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed DMDQ framework and highlight the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed approaches.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Simulation-based ship design
    Bertram, V
    Thiart, GD
    Oceans 2005 - Europe, Vols 1 and 2, 2005, : 107 - 112
  • [22] Toward simulation-based design
    Shephard, MS
    Beall, MW
    O'Bara, RM
    Webster, BE
    FINITE ELEMENTS IN ANALYSIS AND DESIGN, 2004, 40 (12) : 1575 - 1598
  • [23] Simulation-based sequential design
    Muller, Peter
    Duan, Yunshan
    Tec, Mauricio Garcia
    PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2022, 21 (04) : 729 - 739
  • [24] Simulation-based optimal design
    Müller, P
    BAYESIAN STATISTICS 6, 1999, : 459 - 474
  • [25] Reduction of Epistemic Model Uncertainty in Simulation-Based Multidisciplinary Design
    Jiang, Zhen
    Chen, Shishi
    Apley, Daniel W.
    Chen, Wei
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2016, 138 (08)
  • [26] A simulation-based process model for managing complex design projects
    Cho, SH
    Eppinger, SD
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2005, 52 (03) : 316 - 328
  • [27] Multi-Model Bayesian Optimization for Simulation-Based Design
    Tao, Siyu
    van Beek, Anton
    Apley, Daniel W.
    Chen, Wei
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2021, 143 (11)
  • [28] A simulation-based approach to business model design and organizational Change
    Bock, Adam J.
    Warglien, Massimo
    George, Gerard
    INNOVATION-ORGANIZATION & MANAGEMENT, 2021, 23 (01): : 17 - 43
  • [29] Series composition of simulation-based assume-guarantee contracts for linear dynamical systems
    Shali, B. M.
    Heidema, H. M.
    van der Schaft, A. J.
    Besselink, B.
    2022 IEEE 61ST CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2022, : 2204 - 2209
  • [30] Improving simulation model analysis and communication via design of experiment principles: an example from the simulation-based design of cost accounting systems
    Hocke S.
    Meyer M.
    Lorscheid I.
    Journal of Management Control, 2015, 26 (2-3) : 131 - 155