Optimal Cutoff Point for Immunoperoxidase Detection of C4d in the Renal Allograft: Results From a Multicenter Study

被引:7
|
作者
Crary, Gretchen S. [2 ]
Raissian, Yassaman [1 ]
Gaston, Robert C. [3 ]
Gourishankar, Sita M. [4 ]
Leduc, Robert E. [5 ]
Mannon, Roslyn B. [6 ]
Matas, Arthur J. [7 ]
Grande, Joseph P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Lab Med & Pathol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Hennepin Cty Med Ctr, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Minneapolis, MN 55415 USA
[3] Univ Alabama, Div Nephrol, Birmingham, AL USA
[4] Univ Alberta, Div Nephrol & Immunol, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[5] Univ Minnesota, Div Biostat, Minneapolis, MN USA
[6] Univ Alabama, Dept Nephrol, Birmingham, AL USA
[7] Univ Minnesota, Dept Surg, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
C4d; Graft survival; Immunoperoxidase; ANTIBODY-MEDIATED REJECTION; DIFFERENT STAINING TECHNIQUES; ACUTE HUMORAL REJECTION; TRANSPLANT GLOMERULOPATHY; PERITUBULAR CAPILLARIES; BIOPSIES; DEPOSITION; CLASSIFICATION; RECIPIENTS; DEKAF;
D O I
10.1097/TP.0b013e3181f7fec9
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Although C4d deposition in peritubular capillaries has been identified as a strong risk factor for subsequent renal allograft loss, the optimal cutoff for the fraction of peritubular capillaries needed to establish a positive stain in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded material has not been defined systematically. The objective of this study was to establish the threshold for positive staining that best predicts renal outcome in renal biopsies in a multicenter study in which local and central pathologic conditions were compared. Methods. Unstained renal biopsy slides were obtained from 296 patients. The percentage of peritubular capillaries staining positively for C4d was detected by immunoperoxidase staining. Results. The percentage C4d deposition ranged from 0% to 90% with 44% (129/296) having a positive percentage of C4d staining. The median for positive cases was 25%. Local C4d(+) results were reported qualitatively, with 28% recorded as positive for C4d. Using a centrally determined cutoff of 10%, tests for agreement of local and central C4d staining were fair (kappa 0.40, 95% confidence interval 0.29-0.51). Raising the centrally determined cutoff to 25% or 50% did not change the kappa values (0.44 and 0.41, respectively). By Cox proportional hazards model, C4d positivity (centrally determined assessment) using a cutoff of 10% was the strongest predictor of time to graft loss (hazard ratio 2.66, 95% confidence interval 1.68-4.21). Centrally determined C4d positivity correlated with Banff scores indicative of acute inflammation but not with scores indicative of fibrosis/atrophy or transplant glomerulopathy. Conclusions. Our findings indicate that C4d positivity, defined as more than or equal to 10% by immunoperoxidase, is a strong predictor of graft loss.
引用
收藏
页码:1099 / 1105
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Capillary C4d deposition as a marker of humoral immunity in renal allograft rejection
    Watschinger, B
    Pascual, M
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2002, 13 (09): : 2420 - 2423
  • [32] Standardization of scoring of C4d staining in renal allograft biopsies: Consensus from the seventh Banff Conference on allograft pathology
    Racusen, LC
    Colvin, R
    Solez, K
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2003, 14 : 146A - 147A
  • [33] Diagnostic value of C4d in renal allograft biopsies in different clinical settings: Absence of C4d in grafts from non-heart-beating donors
    Crespo, M
    Sole, M
    Arostegui, JL
    Mila, J
    Martorell, J
    Oppenheimer, F
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 37 (09) : 3688 - 3689
  • [34] C4d Immunoreactivity of Intraoperative Zero-Hour Biopsy in Renal Allograft
    Lee, C.
    Park, J. H.
    Suh, J. H.
    Kim, H. W.
    Moon, K. C.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2014, 46 (10) : 3367 - 3370
  • [35] Monocytes and peritubular capillary C4d deposition in acute renal allograft rejection
    Magil, AB
    Tinckam, K
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 63 (05) : 1888 - 1893
  • [36] Immunohistochemistry for C4d in renal allograft biopsies: Which method should be used?
    Roberts, ISD
    McWilliam, LJ
    McEwen, A
    Koo, D
    Quiroga, I
    Procter, J
    Barnardo, MCNM
    Sutton, M
    Cerundolo, L
    Davies, DR
    Friend, PJ
    Morris, PJ
    Fuggle, SV
    JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2005, 207 : 2 - 2
  • [37] Comparison of immunofluorescence and imunohistochemical methods for C4d staining in renal allograft biopsies
    Troxell, ML
    Sibley, RK
    Higgins, JP
    Kambham, N
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2005, 85 : 270A - 270A
  • [38] Capillary deposition of complement C4d and C3d in pediatric renal allograft biopsies
    Herman, J
    Lerut, E
    Van Damme-Lombaerts, R
    Emonds, MP
    Van Damme, B
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 79 (10) : 1435 - 1440
  • [39] Capillary Deposition of Complement C4d and C3d in Chinese Renal Allograft Biopsies
    Lv, Rong
    Zhang, Wei
    Han, Fei
    Liu, Guangjun
    Xie, Wenqing
    Chen, Jianghua
    DISEASE MARKERS, 2015, 2015
  • [40] Automated detection algorithm for C4d immunostaining showed comparable diagnostic performance to pathologists in renal allograft biopsy
    Choi, Gyuheon
    Kim, Young-Gon
    Cho, Haeyon
    Kim, Namkug
    Lee, Hyunna
    Moon, Kyung Chul
    Go, Heounjeong
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2020, 33 (08) : 1626 - 1634